Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367... 497
Corrected data. Not identified → Kricogonia lyside / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
Corrected data. Not identified → Kricogonia lyside / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
Same with subspecies: we must finish.
Corrected data. Not identified → Anartia jatrophae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
Corrected data. Not identified → Anartia jatrophae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
Corrected data. Not identified → Junonia hierta / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
Corrected data. Not identified → Junonia hierta / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
Corrected data. Not identified → Danaus gilippus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
It is necessary to finish the subspecies, where it is necessary.
Corrected data. Not identified → Danaus gilippus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
Corrected data. Not identified → Anartia jatrophae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
Corrected data. Not identified → Anartia jatrophae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Larerannis orthogrammaria / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.
Yes, the first parent in the region, male.
Alexander, it is this, the African race: Cymothoe Hübner, 1819 very interested. Laid out, please, what do you have on it :)
Add: moderator should trust such trusted users like you, Irina. Whereupon, otklanivayus of debate: the more I do here, obviously nothing.
About clarify the meaning of citing: " NO - according to the literature (Kurentsovskie reading) relegata in Primorye usual, is more common. For example, in one of the reports, on 7 collection points 9 copies. relegata against 2 elegans . " So, what style (in capital letters) recruited, what I have highlighted in bold, usually it sounds like a statement. No offense :)
Of course, this is a whole :)
Such things are worth writing immediately, and not after the transfer: "20.10.2014 16:16, Irina Nikulina: Sorry, do not have a computer has) The answer is - there is little doubt this, or minimal) Of course, other types of scanned or on one site, before you write, and do it always. Relegata seen before, a lot of it in the network, wrote, and Yuri is very typical specimens.All the ...
I have it in the LC, at the moment. It is called: "number of other pictures of the same individual" :)
Thank you, Alexander. It seems that the same subspecies that I have male :)
But this is clearly not fagata :) And why, do you think I did not check before the transfer? In the tropics, the way everything is not as smooth as you think you are mistaken. For example, if you take my Eupterote sp. http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/33244 Large butterfly and pretty spectacular, but I was not looking for it, and have not found so-far :)
The female is very necessary. It is a completely different appearance. A picture type is generally one was, my. Since 2009, Alexander :) if-you had looked at the page with the photo, saw-be that she is male and is :)
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Ptilophora jezoensis / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.
DV I do not know, just suggested, just in case :) We, just only plyumigera, and then, on the personal data it has been found in the Ministry of Defense for the first time, approx. 6 years ago :)
Corrected data. Not identified → Operophtera relegata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
I believe the reasons for the transfer convincing enough. Goes to Operophtera relegata :)
Ptilophora sp., "Boy", if I am not mistaken. In the Far East and our two species P. plumigera there.
It is necessary to complete the formation of the form. We got my hands underside sfotat finally :)
One-same question (about the count of. Species) and I wanted to ask: http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Larentiinae/Operophtera_relegata.html
He added underside and the top replaced.
Corrected data. Vasiliy Feoktistov → Dmitriy Pozhogin.
Replaced photos top and underside added.
Well done, that nobody will twitched with this, in fact, a trifling matter.
It is necessary to remove and everything and no geography should not be changed. This male: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/33930 catching me, personally, to the same position, only a day later and was originally in the best condition.
Raises questions. Or give me the right to independently edit their own group, if made a mistake.
del. It's up to the author. P.S. If necessary, explain intelligibly why I agreed with them.
del. It's up to the author.
del. It's up to the author.
del. It's up to the author.
del. It's up to the author.
del. definitely.
del.
Alexander, another found today :) Just my luck to them ..... I will not expose yet :)
Peter is unfolding butterfly, which is shown here: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/4301 must be linked to the group. I, again, it is impossible to relate in any way (
Peter, daring, please This photo from the group. This is not the caterpillar, from which is derived a butterfly. Something I'm confused with these historical photos (Who podtseplen photos, which should be in a band, and it is necessary to remove from it.
Add photo underside and the top replaced.
Add photo underside and the top replaced.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
News
- 12.10.2024: Fixed sorting/ordering errors (Gallery and Catalog sections)
- 10.10.2024: We fixed bad situation with photo captions for insect species that are not yet in the website database
- 31.08.2024: Первые итоги интеграции/переноса/дублирования Молбиола и Инсекты
New photos (13.10.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 17:48, P. Khramov: In some cases, sorting/ordering in ...
- 17:43, P. Khramov: Comments that concerned incorrect p...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Meantime in Japan
- A. Gordon, O. Gorbunov, V. Murzin on Russian TV in 2004
- Entomologist? What kind of job is it?
- Butterflies and music: Moonpools & Caterpillars / Nurses
