Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364... 497
Buck
This species is identified correctly.
Female
Eugene already about this species had a discussion yesterday: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/34536 (where the author also suggested to the question) With tolstogolovkami generally can break his head in my :)
Drive, Alexander: "The distribution includes southern Brazil, Bolivia (Sara Department), Peru, Costa Rica, northern Venezuela, Guadeloupe, Saint Kitts, the Dominican Republic, Haiti and Cuba (Munroe 1959 ; Alayo and Valdes Arteaga 1974; Gomez 1999; FSCA and MGCL specimens). ". I'm more focused on it. American site, according to their types, I think can be trusted more than, I'm sorry, ...
Here, I think, you have to transfer information of their time shooting from the author's comments, in the "The date and time of shooting / fishing" should look my way: "The time and place / fishing: 2011 -12-05 09-22-26 " Apparently from EXIF drives.
Well, something like that, on the number and location of points on the wings Especially now comparable. Picture from nature and only you can determine. I confess, I have put in the exact genital beast, but now it is inaccurate. Left photo by Alexander Dumchusa fragment and a fragment of the right photo from the University of Florida: http://entnemdept.ufl.edu/creatures/fruit/olive_shootworm.htm ...
It is necessary to move the underside and toParnassius nomion
Did. Today, just a couple of the same species there, bezetiketochnyh in inaccurate or neoprene. I put, so I asked)
Why is that?
I am writing to the Krasnoyarsk Territory, in geography. At least something will.
Autumn: In my there related to Krasnoyarsk that it was ...
I do not like "wrappers". Condition good, and therefore loaded. Throwing hand does not rise (
Thank you. Bring your while. I myself can not yet, as you know. I did not want bezetiketochnogo shipping ..... This is how to lose the label .... (
He added underside and changed over.
Label, alas, hopelessly lost, and Parnassius sp. some very beautiful and quite large. FemaleParnassius actius? or someParnassius nomion? (confuse especially red eyes on the front wings). Both assumptions are wrong: they did not realize, it is summarized and ask people to understand. Maybe the photo will come in handy for the site?
Label, alas, hopelessly lost, and Parnassius sp. some very beautiful. FemaleParnassius actius? nomiona subspecies or some? Does not think they entirely. Can a knowledgeable person will bring to mind the image and useful for the site?
It is hopeless at all: there are many such, Red Heads.
Angle difficult. Especially tolstogolovka and a large genus. Hopeless option in my opinion.
ProbablyEurata herrickiimale.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
Peter, then, probably to blame, twice mentioned in our correspondence with Dmitry, comrade, "Holloway" Holloway , but it really is very famous for joint and incomprehensibility qualifier :) It has proved popular for a long time ... Everything is fine here .. :)
Corrected data. Dmitriy Pozhogin → Shirley Sekarajasingham.
Corrected data. Not identified → Ortilia velica / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
Peter, figure it out, please. It turns out that one species in the genus. And this kind was created by mistake, due to confusion in the classification (Photography I suffered and the grounds are now here: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/33650
Corrected data. Odonestis lipara → Arguda erectilinea.
Corrected data. Odonestis lipara → Arguda erectilinea.
Corrected data. Odonestis lipara → Arguda erectilinea.
It is hard to decide on her own. Confused and almost all the links lead to the moths of borneo, where a lot of unknown classification ..... However, there are a subspecies of eol Odonestis erectilinea lipara Tams, 1935 : http://eol.org/pages/30590577/overview And there funet.fi view Arguda erectilinea Swinhoe, 1904 (without subspecies), which has spread just on Borneo and Sumatra: http: ...
In the evening's see now, with good intentions, I have no time. Maybe in the evening, and other fresh ideas will :) P.S. Here 'Friend' Holloway or somebody similar, apparently put his hand tightly .....
Nothing is clear .. And Arguda erectilinea Swinhoe, 1904 there: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/65106 Understand more do you want? Or transfer? Or view is there to do?
The head hurts already, Dimitri. From firewood? Rhode there: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/29148
I did the family, in the form and it suffered.
Corrected data. Not identified → Tristeirometa bostryx / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
The link that I brought below, there are many types. Essential and suffered, in short :)
Corrected data. Not identified → Odonestis lipara / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
Corrected data. Not identified → Odonestis lipara / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
Corrected data. Not identified → Odonestis lipara / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
Here it is: http://eol.org/pages/385847/overview here and do in the old Odonestis (Germar, 1812) There, in the way one views the genus: Odonestis pruni (Linnaeus, 1758 ) and all that generation after him named Silkworm plum , consider it wrong and the Russian name of the genus name is clear: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/1197
Corrected data. Not identified → Xandrames latiferaria / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
My blunder again and for the first time (. Actually created kind of Tristeirometa Holloway, 1997 base: http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/research/projects/butmoth/search/GenusDetails.dsml?NUMBER=29844.0&& It is necessary to alter the species in the genus of that here you can add, recently, a certain kind. Yes, the generic name "Larentiinae" , I did not enter. It seems there is a gun if ...
Corrected data. Not identified → Ozola submontana / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
Where it is necessary to drive a deal. Or here: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-3/lasiocampidae/lasiocampidae_14_2.php? Or here: http://eol.org/pages/30590577/overview? Rod with a double or a subgenus called to do anything I do not understand this math ( The site already has a kind of http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/1197, with a single species. I think that all the same genus: Odonestis ...
Well, I think and find out in 5 years :)
I myself do not remember, honestly speaking, that I determined it :) Apparently, the glitch of some ...
Corrected data. Not identified → Craniophora malesiae / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
Many unknown overlooking. While I will not do anything. It is necessary for clarification.
Corrected data. Not identified → Krananda semihyalina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
Corrected data. Dmitriy Pozhogin → Tatyana Gordeeva.
Tomorrow throw. Including its mistakes to hurt anybody was not.
News
- 24.11.2024: «Поиск энтомологов» работает в полном объеме!
- 24.11.2024: We fixed an error in displaying the website in the "gray" color scheme
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
New photos (25.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 1:57, V. Titov: Для Зарины Кочиевой: это не насеком...
- 1:18, Z. Kochieva: Здравствуйте,помогите определить,чт...
- 16:55, P. Khramov: Euclidia munita (Hubner, 1813) → Go...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- Streets: insects names
- Interview with Alexander Zatakovoy, one of the wild Russian entomologists
- The first IMAX 3D film on the monarch butterfly migration is on the go
