Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361... 497
Types serious hurt to the so-rule ( It is rather improper storage, or simply do not look for a collection. Near the ocean, the humidity is high .... That leads hurl (
Peter, in imprecise it is already from the moment of the download :) The question arose what species it is now better to put (back to inaccurate). There were options for them and I have not yet considered. I give my opinion later. And up to this point it's nothing to do.
Callidrepana patrana
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan, Australian.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan, Australian.
Thank you, Irene. It is. Checked: in only 2 years old type and this one fits into one :)
Beauty will save the world :)
Strange .. It seems a familiar animal, but who it is, I can not understand (even to the kind of ...... Requirement ....
Ornithoptera priamusssp. urvillianus (Guérin-Menéville, 1838)
Apologize. Here I am, just made a mistake in determining the (((. It is still at the local classificationFelinia precedens: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=326983 Here and there she Erygia precedens: http://www.chiba-muse.or.jp/NATURAL/special/moth/Haruta_Collection/80_Noctuidae/08_Catocalinae/Erygia/Erygia_precedens/Erygia_precedens.htm (only the normal ...
You can see here: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=161039
So, what to do then? Cooking it can not be: a series, that is another matter (single copies. No one cooks, as far as I know). Moreover, this is not the suburbs. You can remove all pictures until better times?
Ornithoptera croesus
Psilogramma sp.
Bhutanitis lidderdalii
I know them: both species are exhibited. I repeat: the only risk, without geography butterfly.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
The origin of the need to find out. Most likely it is that if the origin of the Malay (in the houses there are usually butterflies), and there are only 2 types of Samia: http://wildsilkmoth-indonesia.com/pic_mala/mskoh.html
No, it is by no means slluchae not Attacus atlas. It is even another generation. It Samia sp. I think the femaleSamia kohlli(without geography is not very good).
Peter, in the English version, we can not add data to the form? The fact that he wanted to add, and there is no reference to this: http://lepidoptera.pro/taxonomy/120581 way: it is already in Google just indexed version pro., And there is no data.
Male. There are only 3 types: http://butterfliesofamerica.com/L/t/Anteos_a.htm
This species is identified correctly.
I presume that the origin of the material is likely to Asia.
This species is identified correctly.
Alexander put to the inaccurate and that's that. It was conducted from the beginning of the two types. It was established on the basis of geography. Cooking, ruled for single copies. even in perspective.
Offhand South AmericanAnteos menippeyour phone is difficult to determine. Please check and move if I'm right.
Alexander, the foundation here notorious habit. On this basis, there are put in inaccurate picture of nature. Of course I will discuss your options tomorrow. But on the cooking can not be considered. This will mean the loss of a single specimen. (There would be a lot ....
Alexander, I think for the production in the base are inaccurate here :) Now I have at the hands of a few hundred of these mysteries. I'll put them slowly and I hope to help in the definition. And the site need photos of species that are often on it, and not at all.
I am quite convinced geography with mothsofborneo I quote it here just in case: Ericeia korintjiensis : "Geographical range. Sumatra, Java, Borneo" . Ericeia pertendens : "Geographical range. Indo-Australian tropics to Solomons" . From which it follows that Ericeia korintjiensis purely insular view and Ericeia pertendens is very widespread in almost the whole of Southeast Asia. The ...
And do not move, whether all photos without underside rafflesii / viridiluteata in inaccurate? On the upper side, I do not see a difference, but they are very visible on the underside, which is not here. This is a personal opinion and fully admit that it is possible to distinguish at the top, but, I repeat: the differences on top do not see.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
Temporarily changed the photo on the source (any edition only crop). If it helps to clarify definitively with her question.
I think it is not a sin one more copies. this type of load :)
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
Alexander, he (costal margin) is white and fairly wide. There, just need to remove the black background of my camera. Everything is going, but do not reach the hands (
I did not dare to put into precise: in spreading everywhere indicated only Borneo and copies. not to Borneo. Nevertheless, it is in my opinion it is not and option I saw.
And maybe with gderovskogo Pentacon. The name Pentacon / Topcon :) Pentacon, incidentally great cameras do during CMEA)) Well, a good kind of Havat overwhelm commentary on abstract themes :)
Yeah, annexe algorithm, and in general for a long time it is necessary to develop the rules and that they are in a prominent position and in a digestible form. And then this "algorithm" all the time jumping on posts to the individual butterflies, and for all the right not to follow and even more immediately remember "what and where to write" does not work in any way: in fact on the site, "over ...
Yeah :) Googling on request Gespanna pectoralis, open the picture and see what's still cute :)
Wait a couple of days necessary. Do not rush.
C new genus on the site. And only in this genus view :) The key to the door to look at here: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-15-16/episparis/episparis_4_1.php Then I had to google. And the "all-powerful" Google issued photo only 2 species. It seems rare, and this image will be the third (not talking about photo underside, which generally will be the first) :) In determining sure since no one ...
:) On the underside to the top of these two species are virtually indistinguishable, as I understand.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
Well, so be it :) P.S. Although the cost to check out the discussion from the first to comment ....
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
The top must also be transferred to viridiluteata
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
We got hands. I think an option to Borbacha altipardaria Holloway, 1982 is the most appropriate for her. It would be better to shift it to the inaccurateBorbacha altipardaria:) N.B. Today, I upload other type of this kind. And too inaccurate. You can not put them in the exact: strictly ( Online photos are very few of these species, and mostly of information. Here only on m.Holloway and ...
News
- 24.11.2024: «Поиск энтомологов» работает в полном объеме!
- 24.11.2024: We fixed an error in displaying the website in the "gray" color scheme
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
New photos (25.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 1:57, V. Titov: Для Зарины Кочиевой: это не насеком...
- 1:18, Z. Kochieva: Здравствуйте,помогите определить,чт...
- 16:55, P. Khramov: Euclidia munita (Hubner, 1813) → Go...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- The insects exhibition in Kotlas
- Meanwhile, in Kotelnich
- Butterflies and music: Papillon Swing Trio
