Pages: 1 ...351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359... 497
I kind of caught up: UPH is "Upperside hindwings" - The top side of the rear wings :) But formalize of all this can only sweep. Already well in principle.
The site is correct: Delias berinda boyleae That subspecies of it: http://www.delias-butterflies.com/groups/species-groups/group-xiv-belladonna-group/delias-berinda/subspecies-berinda/
I just have a rather "selfish" interest :) The site I'm doing formalization signs and formalizes them on the basis of these data. And the English near the zero level (
Here's a Catocalinae proved. At first glance, all of the bear adopted. She torments her and the family had to do with a view: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=394525 P.S. The hands would tear him who caught for the disgusting quality material (
Now move the business off the ground :) It is necessary to finish the year of description: at the time could not find the information ( It should look like this: Glanycus coendersi Kalis, 1934
The first representative of the kind of site :) Put until inaccurate (highly variable): confirmation or refutation. The Australian version: http://lepidoptera.butterflyhouse.com.au/thyr/myrsusalis.html Kind of interesting that distributed in all zoogeographical regions except Palearctic.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Nearctic, Neotropic, Ethiopic, Indo-Malayan, Australian.
That is now a miracle mohnatokryloe :) I can not understand it, unfortunately ( Maybe someone knows?
Here they just can not be put into precise. Can you confirm or deny. Like the Japanese have found one such rozovokrylogo male: http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/02_EREBIDAE/02_ARCTIINAE/04_Lithosiinae/21_Cyana/Cyana%20perornata/Cyana%20perornata.htm But still I did not dare.
Yes, though, would be our Amphipoea sp. In my opinion the best option :) In Amphipoea sp. it is necessary to withdraw all without exception.
Yulodisy (Julodis sp.) Need iron: all :) And it was full of long-horned beetles should be interesting. Definitely we discuss :)
It is interesting to think about. Thank you :) I have, though mostly beetles, and there should be an interesting long-horned beetles and borers. Be sure to discuss :)
I like there still is some KLEOR: I am afraid even to spread. And Pingasa sp. several species (also, they are like hard) ... The thing we must do say, though moth is not entirely mine: just got a lot of them.
Too logical. I can not wait when Meschera tear, favorite on buduyuschy season plans for fishing on light there is thorough, with a generator and XRD (Tragosoma depsarium still not catching, and there it must be stopudovo) :) And while the material Tropical understand: too The point, however.
Dmitri, who has the material does not end the season all year round. I have it until spring, and then gradually goes into the next :)
Peter, it is necessary to drive the date and the geography here: http://www.leps.it/ There's the lowest kind of picture in the gallery. I do not know, just like with this site provides links to species.
http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-14/plusiinae/plusiinae_4_1.php http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/80_Noctuidae/10Plusiinae/4156%20Thysanoplusia%20orichalcea/Thysanoplusia%20orichalcea.htm
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/02_EREBIDAE/02_ARCTIINAE/04_Lithosiinae/10_Tigrioides/Tigrioides%20puncticollis/Tigrioides%20puncticollis.htm I do not see the options. They are not here.
Behind him, followed by: Xixuthrus heros Heer in Gräffe, 1868 https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xixuthrus_heros Just have not found it ( What about the coins I do not know. I'll ask at the event.
No, I did not get. Yes, they're not caught like especially. True sones BrazhnikSphinx pinastricaught. And in Fiji, he is flying in full :) It can be spread in the archipelago of Fiji safely add :)
Apparently then Omiza sp. AlternativelyOmiza lycorariadoes not fit? Like all four types and it varies.
I do not know how and I do not know whom to give. If you were close, then you would be presented to brew :)
That's really bad case in my opinion. The timid suggestion: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-11/Baptini/baptini_14_4.php and not the fact that she is.
I can not understand who did. There is speculation that the determinable without genitals with a very characteristic appearance.
Options considered and inaccurate to suggest to leave it where it is, right from the start. Geography with mothsofborneo must believe very carefully. Here copies. approx. from the same as my: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=352568