E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359... 497

15.11.2014 15:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Delias berinda

I kind of caught up: UPH is "Upperside hindwings" - The top side of the rear wings :) But formalize of all this can only sweep. Already well in principle.

15.11.2014 14:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35261

Araschnia levana f. prorsa

15.11.2014 14:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Monodecus capillatus

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

15.11.2014 14:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Delias berinda

The site is correct: Delias berinda boyleae That subspecies of it: http://www.delias-butterflies.com/groups/species-groups/group-xiv-belladonna-group/delias-berinda/subspecies-berinda/

15.11.2014 14:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Delias berinda

I just have a rather "selfish" interest :) The site I'm doing formalization signs and formalizes them on the basis of these data. And the English near the zero level (

15.11.2014 13:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35259

Here's a Catocalinae proved. At first glance, all of the bear adopted. She torments her and the family had to do with a view: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=394525 P.S. The hands would tear him who caught for the disgusting quality material (

15.11.2014 11:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Delias belladonna

Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 60—70 mm.

15.11.2014 11:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Delias pasithoe

Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 65—75 mm.

15.11.2014 11:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Delias ninus

Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 65—80 mm.

15.11.2014 11:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Delias acalis

Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 65—75 mm.

15.11.2014 11:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Delias descombesi

Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 65—80 mm.

15.11.2014 11:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35252

Lomaspilis. marginata or opis (confused them).

15.11.2014 11:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35255

Rivula sericealis

15.11.2014 10:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Delias berinda

Svetlana, why introduce in the Russian version of the information in the English language?

15.11.2014 10:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Glanycus coendersi

Now move the business off the ground :) It is necessary to finish the year of description: at the time could not find the information ( It should look like this: Glanycus coendersi Kalis, 1934

15.11.2014 10:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35250

The first representative of the kind of site :) Put until inaccurate (highly variable): confirmation or refutation. The Australian version: http://lepidoptera.butterflyhouse.com.au/thyr/myrsusalis.html Kind of interesting that distributed in all zoogeographical regions except Palearctic.

15.11.2014 9:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Banisia myrsusalis

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Nearctic, Neotropic, Ethiopic, Indo-Malayan, Australian.

15.11.2014 6:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35248

That is now a miracle mohnatokryloe :) I can not understand it, unfortunately ( Maybe someone knows?

15.11.2014 4:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35246

Cyana perornata ?

15.11.2014 3:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35246

Here they just can not be put into precise. Can you confirm or deny. Like the Japanese have found one such rozovokrylogo male: http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/02_EREBIDAE/02_ARCTIINAE/04_Lithosiinae/21_Cyana/Cyana%20perornata/Cyana%20perornata.htm But still I did not dare.

15.11.2014 1:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35232

Rogoz like. Wine is saturated? Interesting :)

14.11.2014 21:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34910

Yes, though, would be our Amphipoea sp. In my opinion the best option :) In Amphipoea sp. it is necessary to withdraw all without exception.

14.11.2014 21:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35236

Peter, there is no option, really. Illustrates.

14.11.2014 14:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35173

Yulodisy (Julodis sp.) Need iron: all :) And it was full of long-horned beetles should be interesting. Definitely we discuss :)

14.11.2014 14:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35225

Swipe: 4.5 cm. (Estimated range).

14.11.2014 14:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35173

It is interesting to think about. Thank you :) I have, though mostly beetles, and there should be an interesting long-horned beetles and borers. Be sure to discuss :)

14.11.2014 14:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35173

I like there still is some KLEOR: I am afraid even to spread. And Pingasa sp. several species (also, they are like hard) ... The thing we must do say, though moth is not entirely mine: just got a lot of them.

14.11.2014 14:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35219

For the link I gave, at the bottom there are links to both types: they are more :)

14.11.2014 14:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35173

Sadly, zeroed, then :)

14.11.2014 14:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35220

Too logical. I can not wait when Meschera tear, favorite on buduyuschy season plans for fishing on light there is thorough, with a generator and XRD (Tragosoma depsarium still not catching, and there it must be stopudovo) :) And while the material Tropical understand: too The point, however.

14.11.2014 13:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35220

Dmitri, who has the material does not end the season all year round. I have it until spring, and then gradually goes into the next :)

14.11.2014 13:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35220

So where you have to filter all :)

14.11.2014 12:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #19041

Peter, it is necessary to drive the date and the geography here: http://www.leps.it/ There's the lowest kind of picture in the gallery. I do not know, just like with this site provides links to species.

14.11.2014 12:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Thysanoplusia orichalcea

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: Palaearctic → Palaearctic, Indo-Malayan, Australian.

14.11.2014 12:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35239

http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-14/plusiinae/plusiinae_4_1.php http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/80_Noctuidae/10Plusiinae/4156%20Thysanoplusia%20orichalcea/Thysanoplusia%20orichalcea.htm

14.11.2014 11:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35236

http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/02_EREBIDAE/02_ARCTIINAE/04_Lithosiinae/10_Tigrioides/Tigrioides%20puncticollis/Tigrioides%20puncticollis.htm I do not see the options. They are not here.

14.11.2014 9:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Tigrioides puncticollis

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

14.11.2014 9:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35219

I brought the link :)

14.11.2014 9:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34910

Alexander, and the others can do the genital same? Here is full of them.

14.11.2014 9:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35173

Behind him, followed by: Xixuthrus heros Heer in Gräffe, 1868 https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xixuthrus_heros Just have not found it ( What about the coins I do not know. I'll ask at the event.

14.11.2014 8:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35173

No, I did not get. Yes, they're not caught like especially. True sones BrazhnikSphinx pinastricaught. And in Fiji, he is flying in full :) It can be spread in the archipelago of Fiji safely add :)

14.11.2014 8:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35225

Apparently then Omiza sp. AlternativelyOmiza lycorariadoes not fit? Like all four types and it varies.

14.11.2014 8:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35173

I do not know how and I do not know whom to give. If you were close, then you would be presented to brew :)

14.11.2014 6:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35198

That's really bad case in my opinion. The timid suggestion: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-11/Baptini/baptini_14_4.php and not the fact that she is.

14.11.2014 6:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35173

I offer up the best times to move in inaccurate and it is put on the spot.

14.11.2014 6:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35225

I can not understand who did. There is speculation that the determinable without genitals with a very characteristic appearance.

14.11.2014 6:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34910

Options considered and inaccurate to suggest to leave it where it is, right from the start. Geography with mothsofborneo must believe very carefully. Here copies. approx. from the same as my: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=352568

14.11.2014 5:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35184

I do see a lot of Including the fact that it has three days from the date of loading, with obviously the best definition. I see no reason to load new types until you have illustrated earlier supplies, including inaccurate.

14.11.2014 2:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34865

It is time.

14.11.2014 2:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35220

No options. Please pay attention.

Next page

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.