Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355... 497
Camouflage is a camouflage :) But where in this group of my moth Abraxas grossulariata?
I agree.
Alexander, I think about the biology of the form can not be judged only by a single article.
But that's not the discussion under the sea, under which the cost. This type is described (if it turns kopperi exactly) in 2001 and I do not think a lot about its biology has been known at the moment :)
Yeah, lepi. The upshot of erroneous group of loans: case. Here and hang any more ((
Forgot Alexander. Just picture it already loaded in September and now they do not accidentally replace the one that had to be. That had to be restored to pick up to an existing underside. P.S. And even then you smiled :) Really I can not determine the average Wine?
The question hangs already almost 2 months ((( We must untie it is a photo from the group. Just compare the date of shooting two tracks and compare them with the release date of the imago, which is also in the group.
Irina, I'm mentally applaud standing :) And no genitals were not needed. Thank you so much :)
It is necessary to finish the year. For almost a month has passed since the request.
Dicallomera fascelina, Andrey Ponomarev (photo in the group).
Alexander, forgot the main thing: to move to a different species. We then drove along and I did not take the caterpillar: it took Andrew and he managed to get the imago. Hence, the override.
Dicallomera fascelinait appeared as a result. Andrey Ponomarev received the imago (caterpillar they took the excretion) and therefore it is necessary to put the definition of Andrew. No wonder: it is the caterpillar of sibling species, both infrequent (one might say are rare) and live in the same habitats :)
Nothing to say except that to the underside of these comrades we must also have the upper hand;)
Alexander, but I would give sradostyu cooking and establish the truth. Well, or exchanged for any zhukovё .... Only here I do not know a man in Moscow who would be interested. This Well-tropics in the end ...... A problem with them forever ( The fact that I am here at the moment exposed - only the "tip of the iceberg" ..... Other afraid even to stand :)
Alexander, with her photo of the peninsula has long been replicated in the network of the authorship Alexei Yakovlev :) It's really not news. And the view seems to be common there. If even to me, passing two copies. "flew into" :)
Geography mothsofborneo on outdated, definitely :) And there is evidence of this. The labels of these copies. true (the person who gathered as the trust itself). Add a personal message in the "spread" of Peninsular Malaysia. Facts (not sites on the network) say that no is not endemic to Borneo :)
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
Irina, all tomorrow) will be available when the normal Internet, ruler and butterfly. I hope that this will really help)))
Yeah, well.
But such a transfer in part because there is a transliteration of the Latin commentaries on Latin Russian :) Google separately from England knows.
Note to the form Chiasmia nora (removed from the database 10.12.2014 1:50): Peter, we must unite with Godonela nora (Walker, 1861): http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/63076 T. E. Old and send back photos. She is now in Godonela. I've kind of lured made
Good result: did not expect :) And beguiled dimorphism Godonela avitusaria: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-11/Macariini/macariini_6_8.php
That's the same kind:Danis danis Andrew, do not write on line "Clarification of classification (subspecies, shape, age)." species name.
Peter photos transferred to another species. It is necessary to clean the page.
Well, why the Russian text amplitude Phat? From England, I do not own, but on Russian reads well. Tea in Russia live :) I fully agree with Irina. And it's a good thing, when a suspicion of one type are obtained two new species for the site :) Irina, thanks blshoe :) A godonely still be ..... They have me :)
Irina, thank you for Keys :) I think they will be useful for the future. In fact, everything is relatively simple and straightforward with distinction "similar" species.
Thank you, Irene. I admit my mistake and completely agree with the arguments. I apologize and ask you to move all three photosDiehlea ducalis
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
No doubt there :) For referenceOrnithospila lineata, referred to the moths of borneo in the "Habitat preference" : http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/85_GEOMETROIDEA/04_GEOMETRIDAE/07_Geometrinae/22_Ornithospila/Ornithospila%20lineata/Ornithospila%20lineata.htm A completely different appearance.
Ornithospila esmeralda? http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-9/geometrini/geometrini_22_8.php
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/02_EREBIDAE/08_SCOLIOPTERYGINAE/Rusicada/Rusicada%20combinans/Rusicada%20combinans.htm
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
Dmitry, I think that you are hasty transfer. It asked not to carry it anywhere yet. These are the butterflies, which is necessary to drive on the keys. Although I agreed with the suggestion, but still, in my opinion the color fringing is not the first and last base and should be more signs.
Godonela avitusaria ♂ ?
Godonela avitusaria ♀ ?
Judging by the colors of fringe, then I agree with the conclusion that it submonstrans. But in spite of this it is important to get rid of its keys. Irina, if you're really not difficult, the sign for, please do everything in detail. Well, a reference to the Keys would like to have :) This is really important.
Irina, thanks for the timely issue. Unfortunately determined only by the notorious "habit." And he doubts is exactly my definition. Of course there are some differences, but I can not understand them yet. We need to find the keys and get rid of them to make an accurate verdict :) I ask is will not tolerate. We must deal with them until the end.
Ornithospila avicularia
Dalima patularia
Dalima patularia
Risoba sp. Risoba obscurivialis? Another option may be aRisoba vialis?
ViewAnomis combinansin the catalog. I think you can endure. If I am not mistaken, I have a couple of copies. straightened (loaded later) :).
Monodecus capillatusin inaccurate.
Monodecus capillatusin inaccurate.
Melanistic couple? We have not seen such dark never ....
We must move to a form similar to the top.
I think it is necessary to put an end. Irina law definition: itOreta carnea. I confess, I forgot about it and did not respond in time. I looked Geometridae: nobody came. Then he suspected for involvement in Bombycidae: too, "the zeros".Even suspected genus Gunda , but then otmёl it :) But before he reached Drepanidae ( And now I want to bring another interesting fact in favor of the ...
And from the same article that the Nizhny Novgorod region. Do people have nothing ..... :) There, by the way, too, entered the Moth: http://red-book-nn.ru/docs/02-2-02-107.htm And the link to our QC. Fashion this (
News
- 12.10.2024: Fixed sorting/ordering errors (Gallery and Catalog sections)
- 10.10.2024: We fixed bad situation with photo captions for insect species that are not yet in the website database
- 31.08.2024: Первые итоги интеграции/переноса/дублирования Молбиола и Инсекты
New photos (13.10.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 17:48, P. Khramov: In some cases, sorting/ordering in ...
- 17:43, P. Khramov: Comments that concerned incorrect p...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Meantime in Japan
- Entomologist? What kind of job is it?
- Meanwhile, in Kotelnich
- Butterflies and music: Blowfly, Butterfly
