E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357... 497

28.11.2014 4:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35614

Thank you, Irene. Apparently the point :) In my opinion it is.

27.11.2014 22:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35478

Peter, the options on the network does not (try typing "Odontodes"), Besides from these two, who swept aside at once :) So far, all I see is an accurate description. This approach can put in all the tropical inaccurate, because the options do not know? Or forever undefined? Sad but true (

27.11.2014 22:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35478

The fact that this "sort of way" is the two links at a fairly respected resources that I brought in my very first post :) I have now, as you can see are these types of which all but with every second problem arises becausethat rarely catches trails in their (more and more "pop" any) and ignorance of (two or three images on a good resource in this case is already very good.

27.11.2014 22:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35606

On underside (or rather by the presence of black spots on the underside of the upper wing) and then about. The underside of these species are very different. Example underside of the second type, which is in abundance on the site: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/27339 Dindica para I saw on top, but in the absence of ispod stopped at Dindica olivacea and therefore put in inaccurate.

27.11.2014 22:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35478

Peter, sent in inaccurate when there are specific variants (types of very similar appearance). I do not see those, though born big. Will they provided, then and will talk about the transfer to inaccurate :)

27.11.2014 20:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35605

On the Global Names Index (there in the sources) - a separate species. The more photos uploaded pervoopisatelem. Grounds enough

27.11.2014 20:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35478

Alexander, I do not see any options. The following explains why :) P.S. If the network has a minimum of pictures, it does not mean that the form incorrectly defined :) Especially to a minimum it is possible to trust.

27.11.2014 20:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35608

To help Google with a little picture of this type :)

27.11.2014 17:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35604

Colias grieshuberi Korb, 2004 I can not understand how and where to add.

27.11.2014 17:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35604

In the admin they are. It is necessary to dig ....

26.11.2014 22:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Monodecus admirandus

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

26.11.2014 22:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Banisia fenestrifera

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan, Australian.

26.11.2014 22:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Achrosis excitata

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

26.11.2014 17:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35549

There, there it is, my dear :) Every summer, as the waves away from mosquitoes, but she's there :)

26.11.2014 16:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35549

Peter, this is meant: http://www.ugolovnyi-advokat.ru/okruzhayushhaya-sreda/otvetstvennost-za-oxotu-na-zhivotnyx.html? Few knows :) Including people who have for catch engage. Thank God the cops have not Prochukhan and did not catch someone or falling for someNymphalis xanthomelas, which we Prorva and in spite of that she on some misunderstanding in QC MO is: http: //kkmo2.verhovye. ru / rb / ...

26.11.2014 14:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35564

Here mystery. Earlier in the race was the only kind of Monodecus admirandus Whalley (1976) with a subspecies of Monodecus admirandus capillatus Whalley, 1976 : http://eol.org/pages/30672608/overview Then they sort of split into two separate species. Monodecus admirandus Whalley (1976) : http://pyralidsofborneo.org/index.php?monodecus-admirandus-whalley-1976plate-8rts-409 Monodecus ...

26.11.2014 13:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35549

It is strange why was neopredёnnym largest sailing vessel in the world :) Famous African species. Riddle .....

26.11.2014 11:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35549

Through the glass must (

26.11.2014 7:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35549

Papilio antimachus

26.11.2014 0:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Banisia myrsusalis

Peter, it is necessary to clean the image of the page type. All the butterflies are redefined and transferred to another species.

25.11.2014 20:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35541

Pingasa ruginaria?

25.11.2014 20:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35543

Pingasa ruginaria?

25.11.2014 17:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35539

I decided to download a second, the last copies. this rare, major and his unique moth. You would not say that it is mikrocheshuekryloe :)

25.11.2014 17:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35536

http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/04_NOLIDAE/02_CHLOEPHORINAE/091_Chloroplaga/Chloroplaga_nygmia/Chloroplaga_nygmia.htm

25.11.2014 17:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33751

It is male. Now a female and put too imprecise :)

25.11.2014 14:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35534

Achrosis sp. Most of all I looked likeAchrosis excitata, but despite this has put in limbo. Confused distribution. And she can not do it?

25.11.2014 10:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33528

Put please group, defined according to the author's comment :). When the transfer, I have not looked back and identified himself.

24.11.2014 10:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35465

They should in all inaccurate.

23.11.2014 23:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35465

I absolutely agree with Irina. It must be carried in inaccurateBanisia fenestrifera

23.11.2014 23:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35454

TheBanisia fenestrifera

23.11.2014 23:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35453

TheBanisia fenestrifera

23.11.2014 23:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35251

TheBanisia fenestrifera

23.11.2014 23:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35250

I agree with more than convincing arguments. It is necessary to correct my mistake and move all 4 copies. (including this one) to theBanisia fenestrifera, but also just inaccurate.

23.11.2014 19:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35502

That's Ethmia, I say. With the scope to more than 4 centimeters. You can take over a large lishaynitsu) Mistakes can not be: http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/20_GELECHIOIDEA/Ethmiidae/Ethmia%20palawana/Ethmia%20palawana.htm It is there one :)

23.11.2014 19:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Ethmia palawana

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

23.11.2014 19:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35496

Hesudra divisa? http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/02_EREBIDAE/02_ARCTIINAE/04_Lithosiinae/02_Hesudra/Hesudra%20divisa/Hesudra%20divisa.htm Confused lack in the area of ​​the peninsula.

23.11.2014 18:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35494

It's a pity there is no male ( With determination everything is very simple. From related species Monosyntaxis trimaculata Hampson, 1900 is characterized primarily dark tops and bordering the hind wings. Arel so as wider than the M. trimaculata. http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-7/plesiomorphic%20genera/plesiomorphic_4_2.php (M. trimfculata to have to go to the link).

23.11.2014 14:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Earophila pseudobadiata

It is likely I created, and probably at the same time with you, and I guess :) glyukanul of simultaneity :) It is necessary to remove the course.

23.11.2014 14:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35467

I fully agree with Irina. It is necessary to put in inaccurateTrichosea champato the new amendments, if any, will be :) Too many rummaged through it.

23.11.2014 14:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #31128

Pretending relying on Vasilenko: http://szmn.sbras.ru/Lepidop/Geometr/larent.htm You can transfer :)

23.11.2014 14:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35478

Alexander the on moths of borneo given 2 types and one of them does not fit categorically. It Odontodes seranensis: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-14/stictopterinae/stictopterinae_5_1.php And boldsystems three. And the same thing: the only suitable one. And about the pictures: Well, a little help from Google images :) It's good :) Man catches in the most wilds on a generator with DRL and ...

23.11.2014 13:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #22584

Here, I porzhaluy agree with Alexander. In my quite complete it too soonDysphania subrepleta, than militaris. First of all you assume the figure of hind wings: it is different in these species: D. militaris: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-9/dysphaniini/dysphaniini_1_2.php D. subrepleta: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-9/dysphaniini/dysphaniini_1_4.php But it could easily be somebody else.

23.11.2014 13:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35262

Irina, thanks for the correction. You really right about the size, I looked it up on the site and the link given incorrect - to another form (. Indeed, based on the size, you can immediately eliminate two of the smallest species: Banisia myrsusalis and Banisia lobata. Who remaining closer to your look?

23.11.2014 11:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35486

Dysphania militaris: http://www.ccs-hk.org/DM/butterfly/Geometrid/Dysphania-militaris.html in my opinion.

22.11.2014 16:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Odontodes pallidifimbria

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

22.11.2014 16:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35478

No question: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=588678 (here, the truth is posemeystvo in Eutelidae) http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-14/stictopterinae/stictopterinae_5_2.php And no options.

22.11.2014 14:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35458

That photo, without a preview, where I wrote that it is not Macroglossum stellatarum and did not no hawk moth magically vanished and instead there was this. There caterpillar of the genus Corydalis Cerura was on the sheet, and here at the beginning. Strange things are happening. Just some mystic))) Do not believe your eyes: called. We must wipe from the top of the line everything is now.

22.11.2014 12:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35467

Female Trichosea sp. (Noctuidae → Pantheinae). At first thought toTrichosea androdes: endemic of Sumatra and Peninsular Malaysia, and the like as a single species driven from the peninsula (even kind of did). And today withdrew raspravilki and think not like (I suggest "torment" for her species. Can izmenchivomt? I ran out of ideas (

22.11.2014 0:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Trichosea androdes

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

21.11.2014 10:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35439

purpuraria

Next page

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.