Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357... 497
Thank you, Irene. Apparently the point :) In my opinion it is.
Peter, the options on the network does not (try typing "Odontodes"), Besides from these two, who swept aside at once :) So far, all I see is an accurate description. This approach can put in all the tropical inaccurate, because the options do not know? Or forever undefined? Sad but true (
The fact that this "sort of way" is the two links at a fairly respected resources that I brought in my very first post :) I have now, as you can see are these types of which all but with every second problem arises becausethat rarely catches trails in their (more and more "pop" any) and ignorance of (two or three images on a good resource in this case is already very good.
On underside (or rather by the presence of black spots on the underside of the upper wing) and then about. The underside of these species are very different. Example underside of the second type, which is in abundance on the site: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/27339 Dindica para I saw on top, but in the absence of ispod stopped at Dindica olivacea and therefore put in inaccurate.
Peter, sent in inaccurate when there are specific variants (types of very similar appearance). I do not see those, though born big. Will they provided, then and will talk about the transfer to inaccurate :)
On the Global Names Index (there in the sources) - a separate species. The more photos uploaded pervoopisatelem. Grounds enough
Alexander, I do not see any options. The following explains why :) P.S. If the network has a minimum of pictures, it does not mean that the form incorrectly defined :) Especially to a minimum it is possible to trust.
To help Google with a little picture of this type :)
Colias grieshuberi Korb, 2004 I can not understand how and where to add.
In the admin they are. It is necessary to dig ....
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan, Australian.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
There, there it is, my dear :) Every summer, as the waves away from mosquitoes, but she's there :)
Peter, this is meant: http://www.ugolovnyi-advokat.ru/okruzhayushhaya-sreda/otvetstvennost-za-oxotu-na-zhivotnyx.html? Few knows :) Including people who have for catch engage. Thank God the cops have not Prochukhan and did not catch someone or falling for someNymphalis xanthomelas, which we Prorva and in spite of that she on some misunderstanding in QC MO is: http: //kkmo2.verhovye. ru / rb / ...
Here mystery. Earlier in the race was the only kind of Monodecus admirandus Whalley (1976) with a subspecies of Monodecus admirandus capillatus Whalley, 1976 : http://eol.org/pages/30672608/overview Then they sort of split into two separate species. Monodecus admirandus Whalley (1976) : http://pyralidsofborneo.org/index.php?monodecus-admirandus-whalley-1976plate-8rts-409 Monodecus ...
It is strange why was neopredёnnym largest sailing vessel in the world :) Famous African species. Riddle .....
Through the glass must (
Papilio antimachus
Peter, it is necessary to clean the image of the page type. All the butterflies are redefined and transferred to another species.
Pingasa ruginaria?
Pingasa ruginaria?
I decided to download a second, the last copies. this rare, major and his unique moth. You would not say that it is mikrocheshuekryloe :)
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/04_NOLIDAE/02_CHLOEPHORINAE/091_Chloroplaga/Chloroplaga_nygmia/Chloroplaga_nygmia.htm
It is male. Now a female and put too imprecise :)
Achrosis sp. Most of all I looked likeAchrosis excitata, but despite this has put in limbo. Confused distribution. And she can not do it?
Put please group, defined according to the author's comment :). When the transfer, I have not looked back and identified himself.
They should in all inaccurate.
I absolutely agree with Irina. It must be carried in inaccurateBanisia fenestrifera
TheBanisia fenestrifera
TheBanisia fenestrifera
TheBanisia fenestrifera
I agree with more than convincing arguments. It is necessary to correct my mistake and move all 4 copies. (including this one) to theBanisia fenestrifera, but also just inaccurate.
That's Ethmia, I say. With the scope to more than 4 centimeters. You can take over a large lishaynitsu) Mistakes can not be: http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/20_GELECHIOIDEA/Ethmiidae/Ethmia%20palawana/Ethmia%20palawana.htm It is there one :)
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
Hesudra divisa? http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/02_EREBIDAE/02_ARCTIINAE/04_Lithosiinae/02_Hesudra/Hesudra%20divisa/Hesudra%20divisa.htm Confused lack in the area of the peninsula.
It's a pity there is no male ( With determination everything is very simple. From related species Monosyntaxis trimaculata Hampson, 1900 is characterized primarily dark tops and bordering the hind wings. Arel so as wider than the M. trimaculata. http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-7/plesiomorphic%20genera/plesiomorphic_4_2.php (M. trimfculata to have to go to the link).
It is likely I created, and probably at the same time with you, and I guess :) glyukanul of simultaneity :) It is necessary to remove the course.
I fully agree with Irina. It is necessary to put in inaccurateTrichosea champato the new amendments, if any, will be :) Too many rummaged through it.
Pretending relying on Vasilenko: http://szmn.sbras.ru/Lepidop/Geometr/larent.htm You can transfer :)
Alexander the on moths of borneo given 2 types and one of them does not fit categorically. It Odontodes seranensis: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-14/stictopterinae/stictopterinae_5_1.php And boldsystems three. And the same thing: the only suitable one. And about the pictures: Well, a little help from Google images :) It's good :) Man catches in the most wilds on a generator with DRL and ...
Here, I porzhaluy agree with Alexander. In my quite complete it too soonDysphania subrepleta, than militaris. First of all you assume the figure of hind wings: it is different in these species: D. militaris: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-9/dysphaniini/dysphaniini_1_2.php D. subrepleta: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-9/dysphaniini/dysphaniini_1_4.php But it could easily be somebody else.
Irina, thanks for the correction. You really right about the size, I looked it up on the site and the link given incorrect - to another form (. Indeed, based on the size, you can immediately eliminate two of the smallest species: Banisia myrsusalis and Banisia lobata. Who remaining closer to your look?
Dysphania militaris: http://www.ccs-hk.org/DM/butterfly/Geometrid/Dysphania-militaris.html in my opinion.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
No question: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=588678 (here, the truth is posemeystvo in Eutelidae) http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-14/stictopterinae/stictopterinae_5_2.php And no options.
That photo, without a preview, where I wrote that it is not Macroglossum stellatarum and did not no hawk moth magically vanished and instead there was this. There caterpillar of the genus Corydalis Cerura was on the sheet, and here at the beginning. Strange things are happening. Just some mystic))) Do not believe your eyes: called. We must wipe from the top of the line everything is now.
Female Trichosea sp. (Noctuidae → Pantheinae). At first thought toTrichosea androdes: endemic of Sumatra and Peninsular Malaysia, and the like as a single species driven from the peninsula (even kind of did). And today withdrew raspravilki and think not like (I suggest "torment" for her species. Can izmenchivomt? I ran out of ideas (
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.
purpuraria
News
- 24.11.2024: «Поиск энтомологов» работает в полном объеме!
- 24.11.2024: We fixed an error in displaying the website in the "gray" color scheme
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
New photos (25.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 6:31, E. Komarov: Hippodamia variegata...
- 1:57, V. Titov: Для Зарины Кочиевой: это не насеком...
- 1:18, Z. Kochieva: Здравствуйте,помогите определить,чт...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- 20th International Insect Fair in Moscow (Russia, October 2023)
- Streets: insects names
- Wisconsin DNR calls for help against gypsy moth
