Insecta.pro Community

07.11.2014 6:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34868

Yes, Alexander, you understood correctly: so. :) Everything is fit to be her Tanaorhinus viridiluteata (base below). Drag.

06.11.2014 23:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34893

Funny blooper found the Japanese, with respect to this type: "Range: Borneo Endemic, frequent in upper montane ": http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/02_EREBIDAE/02_ARCTIINAE/03_Arctiinae/03_Areas/Areas%20galactina/Areas%20galactina.htm Oh, I do not say that this is endemic of Borneo :)

06.11.2014 23:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34868

Irina, thank you for what drew my attention to an absolute blunder. Judging from the underside of the rear wings, it really Tanaorhinus viridiluteata. Differences clearly shows the underside of the Japanese on their website: Tanaorhinus ...

06.11.2014 17:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Areas galactina

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

06.11.2014 14:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34865

Of course, why I wrote the comments regarding these two kinds :) They do "like two drops of water 'and geography is very helpful in this case to put the point: there is China, but here Peninsular Malaysia, Sumatra and Borneo :) I, just from Peninsular Malaysia is now full of material. Label true 100% (caught my good friend).

06.11.2014 14:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34865

Not to be confused with a similar appearance, the Chinese view:Tanaorhinus reciprocata:) Forms very significantly different in geography, which can be seen here: http://www.nic.funet.fi/index/Tree_of_life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/geometroidea/geometridae/geometrinae/tanaorhinus/ Notice a significant gap areas. Soglasngo the reduced reference is no longer synonymous. It should be on site ...

06.11.2014 14:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Tanaorhinus reciprocata

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

06.11.2014 13:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34563

It is possible that the proposed Dmitry option has the right to be. Given the variability of the species and the fact that it forms several subspecies: http://www.butterfliesofamerica.com/L/t/Chamaelimnas_briola_a.htm, I agree with Dmitry and advocate for the transfer to theChamaelimnas briola:)

06.11.2014 12:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34742

This species is identified correctly.

06.11.2014 12:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34748

This species is identified correctly.

06.11.2014 12:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34744

This species is identified correctly.

06.11.2014 12:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34743

This species is identified correctly.

06.11.2014 10:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Platyja minutipuncta

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

06.11.2014 8:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34854

Sinev catalog in a format djvu put here: https://yadi.sk/d/XqyHuBAccX7Wd Program - viewer for this format can be downloaded here: http://windjview.sourceforge.net/ru/ Fifth volume to the insects DV I, unfortunately not (

06.11.2014 1:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Tanaorhinus malayanus

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

05.11.2014 22:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Antheraea roylei

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

05.11.2014 20:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Ericeia eriophora

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

05.11.2014 17:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Corymica pryeri

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan, Australian.

05.11.2014 16:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Hyposidra aquilaria

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

05.11.2014 12:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34853

Danaus chrysippus

05.11.2014 12:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34855

Danaus chrysippus

05.11.2014 1:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34787

Irina, thank you. I confess: there, I just did not look, but worth it. Just a few distinct thence pictures ... Tomorrow I will be with a human Internet and will observe is given necessarily arguments. I think, and then put an end :)

04.11.2014 21:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34787

Or are synonyms, or different kinds? Mysterious butterfly for me, as well as the author of the first description .... Maybe you can somehow clarify the situation?

04.11.2014 16:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34745

Defective, simply. The day before yesterday it looked, though there was no time to write. Now his exotic Pts. a lot of. And it must be generally determined and put on the site :)

04.11.2014 16:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34745

This species is identified correctly.

04.11.2014 15:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34824

Male. If this is it. On the phone I can not check.

04.11.2014 13:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34745

Female.

03.11.2014 20:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34787

Holloway, in a word ....

03.11.2014 19:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34787

This has not yet dared to put into precise: a lot of unknown to them. Alternatively MoreBorbacha altipardaria???

03.11.2014 18:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34760

Pingasa lariariastill be on my? Later, several kinds of Pingasa loaded (will be in neoprene. Set). There is possibility to define?

03.11.2014 18:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34760

I, exactly the same, "fly" 3 copies. and all look the same: http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/74_Geometridae/72.7_Geometrinae/2169Pingasa/2172Pingasa_ruginaria/Pingasa_ruginaria.htm In general, a lot of moths Malay received this time: hope posmosch :)

03.11.2014 17:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34778

Parthenos sylvia

03.11.2014 17:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Borbacha punctipardaria

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

03.11.2014 17:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Dalima patularia

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

03.11.2014 16:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Ornithospila avicularia

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

03.11.2014 16:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Agathia rubrilineata

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

03.11.2014 15:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Tridrepana argentistriga

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

03.11.2014 12:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Fascellina albicordis

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

03.11.2014 12:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Fascellina castanea

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

03.11.2014 10:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Pingasa commutata

It must be combined with Pingasa ruginaria (Guenée, 1857): http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/59272 It is a subspecies of it, rather than a separate species.

03.11.2014 10:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Pingasa ruginaria

It is necessary to add the following subtypes: Pingasa ruginaria andamanica Prout, 1916 Pingasa ruginaria communicans (Walker, 1860) Pingasa ruginaria commutata (Walker, 1860) Pingasa ruginaria interrupta Warren, 1901 Pingasa ruginaria pacifica Inoue, 1964 And of synonyms remove Pingasa ruginaria andamanica Prout, 1916 and Pingasa ruginaria pacifica Inoue, 1964 . Subspecies in ...

02.11.2014 20:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34740

Well, here it is, too, in all guises: http://en.butterflycorner.net/Papilio-thoas-King-Swallowtail.466.0.html As they say: "Without the bottle does not understand" :)

02.11.2014 20:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34750

I determined at this link: http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/85_GEOMETROIDEA/04_GEOMETRIDAE/02_Ennominae/012_Fascellina/Fascellina%20albicordis/Fascellina%20albicordis.htm In general, the gap with the picture type in Google a huge ...

02.11.2014 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34740

What is my fault?

02.11.2014 15:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Godonela nora

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

02.11.2014 12:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34740

Papilio cresphontes

01.11.2014 21:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #30339

Buck

01.11.2014 21:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #24464

Zygaena viciaereason stated here: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/34720

01.11.2014 17:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34720

Well, that's another photo definitively clarified that with minos I was wrong a year ago. Now you can carry it in a group photo to viciae :)

01.11.2014 13:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34720

It is not just "give", and it is necessary to understand :) What I see in this specific image, wrote the following: a modified strongly enough: Z. viciae? But maybeZygaena lonicerae(too atypical), but not minos (on that photo, I probably was wrong a year ago). Two options: Z. viciae or Z. lonicerae: it is necessary to reason someone else :)

Sternocera chrysis Fabricius, 1775

Buprestidae

Hydaticus seminiger De Geer, 1774

Dytiscidae

Karanasa alpherakyi (Avinoff, 1910)

Nymphalidae

Zenophassus schamyl (Christoph, 1888)

Hepialidae

Resseliella theobaldi Barnes, 1927

Cecidomyiidae