Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366... 497
Corrected data. Empyreuma pugione → Empyreuma affinis.
Corrected data. Not identified → Empyreuma pugione / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Empyreuma pugione / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Enyo lugubris / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Xylophanes tersait in my opinion. Here: http://www.silkmoths.bizland.com/DRsphinx.htm he feels fine in the list.
Corrected data. Not identified → Hamadryas amphichloe / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
Corrected data. Not identified → Hamadryas amphichloe / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
Corrected data. Not identified → Erinnyis ello / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Erinnyis ello / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Enyo lugubris / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Enyo lugubris / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Hyles lineata / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
Corrected data. Not identified → Xylophanes rhodocera / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
Corrected data. Not identified → Xylophanes rhodocera / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
They are. I stand. Dominican hawk moths on the pictures to drive well here: http://www.silkmoths.bizland.com/DRsphinx.htm
Corrected data. Not identified → Callionima falcifera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Callionima falcifera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Xylophanes pluto / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Xylophanes pluto / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Xylophanes pluto / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Xylophanes pluto / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
He was there alone.
Corrected data. Not identified → Protambulyx strigilis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Protambulyx strigilis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
:) Just a drunk in the trash already ..... Pohuhol, and Nahuhol? Of course :) There are some rock mole, I know :)
The group tie.
Corrected data. Not identified → Anartia jatrophae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
Corrected data. Not identified → Anartia jatrophae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
No problem. Alexander, the other will deal with tomorrow, huh? Now, just head thinks does not matter so far. After shaft yesterday's accusations about my transfer to this, the unfortunate, the Far East moth. When, as a result, are right ..... I would not right for some. In principle: it was so .... And more than once. Will survive.
Corrected data. Not identified → Protambulyx strigilis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
Corrected data. Not identified → Protambulyx strigilis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
Corrected data. Xylophanes tersa / Vasiliy Feoktistov → Xylophanes clarki / Alex Dumchus.
Well, as someone else?
Corrected data. Not identified → Xylophanes clarki / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
Corrected data. Not identified → Xylophanes clarki / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
He is: http://www.silkmoths.bizland.com/xclarki.htm admit mistakes.
Yeah, okay, Alexander: what could be there. We work. No offense :)
Alexander, it was her last I checked thoroughly. Why I was sure. Very upset all this, honestly admit. Let vorzderzhimsya from mutual nitpicking, eh? P.S. Especially as we have already proved that in the transfer of this butterfly, I was right initially, at 99, 9% (this is because the genitals of a picture in nature do not get it).
I have something not found. Head bad now understands.
View new, wait with the creation. It is necessary to clarify and then do it.
And she is in the exact, since yesterday. And I do not see the point in this zatevanii, yesterday's debate.
Heartily. Thank you, Yuri. It's like just what we wanted to prove :) At least now I have a clear conscience .......
Corrected data. Not identified → Hamadryas amphichloe / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
Corrected data. Not identified → Hamadryas amphichloe / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
This species is identified correctly.
I found the same specimens. (luckily I was in the bins), photographed and replaced. For history, the history :) P.S. Top Brand "killed", so I see no reason to download it :)
When a literal translation from Latin, via Google-modern interpreter at all sooooo "merry" scoop :) And in fact, it makes sense to come up with this name: http://roman_law_la_ru.academic.ru/3578/hilaris (Latin was the Romans).
Yuri, Respect :) Just ask her photo with ET, when lecturing her from Moscow: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/34159 and it will appear. We have the Far East "gift" is also seen caught on fast and occurs regularly in the fall.
No one was cheated :) came later.
Each specimen. Butterfly is different, so everything must underside. Two identical butterfly does not happen, as well as two people are alike :) I propose to close this discussion on this page.
News
- 24.11.2024: «Поиск энтомологов» работает в полном объеме!
- 24.11.2024: We fixed an error in displaying the website in the "gray" color scheme
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
New photos (25.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 16:55, P. Khramov: Euclidia munita (Hubner, 1813) → Go...
- 11:40, N. Grebennikov: По такому фото невозможно определит...
- 22:47, V. Kolesnikov: Похожа на Orthetrum cancellatum (по...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- The petition in defense of biological nomenclature
- The insects exhibition in Kotlas
- Two butterfly exhibitions: Cumberland House Natural History Museum and Connemara National Park
