Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372... 497

05.10.2014 7:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #22021

Irina was the blue tide, whether it has copies., The top? On the contour, such as female, but you need to check.

05.10.2014 7:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #31513

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 7:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #22923

Corrected data. Female → Male.

05.10.2014 7:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #22770

Corrected data. Male → Female.

05.10.2014 7:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #22769

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

05.10.2014 7:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #22768

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 7:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #17013

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 7:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #13809

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 7:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #13651

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 7:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9467

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 7:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9011

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 7:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #7430

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 7:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #6400

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 7:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3756

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 7:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3718

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 7:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3709

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 7:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #2371

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 7:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9012

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 7:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #26828

I put in males. A fragment of a wing belongs to the male.

05.10.2014 7:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #26828

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 7:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #13275

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 7:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #14382

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 7:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #22019

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 6:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #22949

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

05.10.2014 6:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27911

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 6:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27919

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 6:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #22020

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 1:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33938

I did not dare to put it in the exact ...... And for obvious reasons :) I will ask to confirm or deny.

05.10.2014 1:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33916

Shamil, it is the only one in the family. Therefore, you can immediately into accurate :)

05.10.2014 1:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33916

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

05.10.2014 0:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9468

I afford to clarify the geography of the picture. It would be superfluous in this case. Moscow is a metropolis, one of the largest in the world :)

05.10.2014 0:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9468

Corrected data.

05.10.2014 0:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #7758

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 0:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #7754

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 0:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5796

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 0:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3769

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 0:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3768

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

05.10.2014 0:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #2369

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

04.10.2014 23:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33915

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

04.10.2014 23:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33933

Well, that's the Vladimir region on the geography of the form to help :)

04.10.2014 22:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3607

del.

04.10.2014 22:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3606

UPD. Done. At the same time span and formalized.

04.10.2014 22:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Apatura ilia

Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 55—70 mm.

04.10.2014 22:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Apatura iris

Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 60—70 mm.

04.10.2014 22:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #2371

An interesting aberration. And, importantly, it has a name: Apatura iris f. iole (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775) . Too bad the photo is not clickable and you can not finish in the top row (

04.10.2014 21:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33927

I uploaded underside and replaced the top: work on the bugs. Good to have a collection that is going to for decades. You can always find the right instance. It is already 18 years passed. Butterflies in nature so do not live :)

04.10.2014 21:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3606

Later, I add the source and transferred Old. This is me as an example and led to consult :) Well, on this occasion, to make a "two dogs" on the main page of the form. However, I not tried it yet. Can they work there?