Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422... 497

05.06.2014 5:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29951

To light the most relevant in my opinion. And as I had not guessed? After sfotaesh, for example Belyanko some and then "squirm" in the editor to make it on a white background somehow stood out (and the black background, this question is easily solved:)

05.06.2014 1:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29934

It is necessary to google. Nyctemera black I have not come across: there are not many should be in my opinion. On the phone, as without hands ... Although with an Internet, already annoyed (

05.06.2014 0:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29921

Endemic to Borneo, by the way. Maybe even be endemic: there are many of them. Svetlana, a successful trip you :)

05.06.2014 0:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29899

This species is identified correctly.

05.06.2014 0:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29921

This species is identified correctly.

04.06.2014 23:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29953

Corrected data. Not identified → Goldia pacifica / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 23:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29952

Corrected data. Not identified → Goldia pacifica / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 22:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29951

Dmitry, a black background is a good idea for light butterflies. It should also experiment. Many removes blemishes associated with white background :)

04.06.2014 22:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29822

Yeah, thank you, come on :)

04.06.2014 21:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29935

Some are more likely to have the next day. If I'm able to physically .... Now briefly reviewed, and seems to have found someone :)

04.06.2014 20:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29938

Sorry, but to put these into precise I can not for obvious reasons (the author of a comment does not count, though he touched me personally his rudeness) :) By the same I would like to ask the author.What is this place name "Novoperedelkino, New Moscow", used as the geography of the shooting? Maybe worth it to write "Moscow Western Administrative District, the district Novoperedelkino"? And then ...

04.06.2014 20:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29938

Corrected data. Not identified → Boloria selene / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 18:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29822

Alexander, in the wake of today's discussion. This is my yesterday. Look it, please ... What if ...? Ind. assembled and already raspravilke: soon lay out. Something it differently colored than those that I have exhibited before. Already I started to doubt :)

04.06.2014 18:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #16564

Alexander, but I'm just about what is best to compare the two insects on pins (here are some stuff for the most reliable determination not like, as it turns out, until the spray of bile: it is insulting to me) than to determine the nature of the photo related species. Just one but at retikulaty I did not catch until now.Now I'll know who to me except her endeavor. It's really close to me ...

04.06.2014 17:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29938

Alex, but it is not necessary to be rude in response to the 'legitimate joke :) As soon as just explained in the comments what and how. Why should you ask? Nature is such a joke: butterflies are often born and then live with deformed wings. What you do not live exhibit for the cabinet of curiosities? As for fasting, as you say "carrion" .......Yes, I did poschu so how do entomology for 30 years ...

04.06.2014 15:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29938

Also sorry for her ( I do not venture to endure until the "exhibit for the cabinet of curiosities" :)

04.06.2014 15:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29939

Corrected data. Not identified → Eumedonia eumedon / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 15:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29941

Corrected data. Not identified → Boloria selene / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 15:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29940

Corrected data. Not identified → Carterocephalus palaemon / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 15:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29937

Corrected data. Not identified → Araschnia levana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 15:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29842

I put until inaccurate megacephala (melanistic come across in my area). There were two options: auricoma and the least likely aceris (flies much later than usual for us). He stopped still on megacephala. I will be glad to confirmation or refutation ...

04.06.2014 14:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29842

Corrected data. Not identified → Subacronicta megacephala / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.06.2014 14:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #16564

Well, if caught both: Issues mean :) I just removed one retikulata always comes and really have nothing to compare :) Because after all, actually thought. Just Hripan me very close geographically. The second "in the subject", by the way, actually more like a classic retikulatu.

04.06.2014 13:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #16564

Alexander, I would be in your place, so take your time with it. Retikulata varies greatly: cm. Laid me yesterday and laid out earlier. The day after tomorrow I can only check, but Kitty did not meet even once. Although it is listed. Figuring there must deepened or at least put in is inaccurate :)

04.06.2014 11:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29836

It should mean Peter wrote: "Announce the entire list, please" :)

04.06.2014 10:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29775

It has long been said, in fact, that the disorder .... "And things are there" (

04.06.2014 10:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29775

Corrected data. Not identified → Scoparia subfusca / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 10:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29787

Corrected data. Not identified → Abrostola triplasia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 10:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29786

Corrected data. Not identified → Abrostola triplasia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 10:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29785

Corrected data. Not identified → Abrostola triplasia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 10:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29788

Corrected data. Not identified → Abrostola triplasia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 6:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29845

As in the past year in the Moscow region there is a massive departure Satin Moth. Now, in the morning they all seated balcony. This disaster ( But just a few years ago, it was not in such numbers ....

04.06.2014 5:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29842

Sorry, of course, alsoSubacronicta megacephalaas here adopted. This I habitually :)

04.06.2014 5:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29842

Acronicta megacephala? Unfortunately most do not have time to understand, and I want to ask for help :)

04.06.2014 4:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29772

It is, incidentally, one arrived then and more so I do not remember. Probably not very often :)

04.06.2014 4:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29836

Who is Alex Shparaga? Somehow, in the list of authors I have it :)

04.06.2014 4:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29838

No big deal: fixed :)

04.06.2014 4:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29838

Corrected data. Not identified → Hedya ochroleucana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

03.06.2014 23:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28780

Scattered in a short time: a sign of the faithful. The truth is that I can do only 6 numbers (work two days in a row).

03.06.2014 23:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #6787

Corrected data. Herminia tarsicrinalis / Nikolai Vladimirov → Herminia tarsipennalis / Irina Nikulina.

03.06.2014 23:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #6787

I agree, stand clear.

03.06.2014 23:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29825

This species is identified correctly.

03.06.2014 23:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28780

In my opinion it's really Chlorissa sloraria: external border is not the front wings are yellow. In viridata white border. This difference, known to me to coordinate. We must wait and see what people have to say.

03.06.2014 23:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Chlorissa cloraria

Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 18—20 mm.