Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425... 497
Alexander, you look it, please, and then today I threw in a hurry and left, and he did not have time to look :) Nothing can be said?
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 20—22 mm.
Yeah. And the first photo on the site :) eight regions much more interesting in itself harbors. Although it seems that everything has been studied for a long time every year I find someone - something new :) This year, of male butterflies Phillodesma japonica (view recently confirmed in MO) and then it would be: a dream is :)
Corrected data. / → Xestia c-nigrum / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Once again I remind you: Peter, by my discovery in exactly the same Makar (one photo) Set a new MO for the kind of beetle-barbel. True discovery is published here and there in the literature (already mentioned this). So that everything is fine in my opinion: it is necessary to specify the region.
This photo overstepped the mark "900" :)
About this family can not say vagrants. You can tell a rare :) Nakhodka there is a fact. And you need to put even after a finding as this suggests that the species in the region is. More meeting: I will keep in mind itself-a :) Let's stop unnecessary controversy.
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Yes, I now will do so :) Just recall the case with the notorious beetle, which I found on my balcony, and at that time it was not specified for MO in the "List of longhorn beetles of the Moscow region" ML Danilevsky :) It's true copies.I gathered, but still it is still in my collection is, and it took only a photo, to prove that the species is in the MO :)
Yuri, please write a valid name, but not synonymous: so it will be easier :)
Corrected data. / Imago → Papilio maackii / Female.
I do not understand .... When a fait accompli hence should be taken for granted. And any type of dogma Sinev year 2008 there should not slow down. Time passes, insects and even expand the areas of trust, they do not know what the administrative boundaries established by man :) Either Therefore remove all photos: we assume that the findings were not ....Let all of Sinev will, if it's so important ...
Peter, and perhaps of the leaf are migrants? Is there not a fact?
Peter, we must add eight regions (# 8. The European Central). Base here: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/10467 Ahead Sinev go wide tread :)
Corrected data. Not identified → Sciota hostilis / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Sciota hostilis / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Pampering, not self-indulgence, and four kinds of Micra already downloaded .... And again in the morning a couple of species will be at least :)
Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.
Thank you! In fact I have a magical balcony :)
Alexander, that's another angle. The truth and the other butterfly :)
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 31—36 mm.
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 50—75 mm.
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 50—75 mm.
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 30—34 mm.
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 26—30 mm.
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 64—74 mm.
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 46—54 mm.
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 40—55 mm.
Corrected data. Not identified → Lomographa temerata / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
It has long been said already .... stand until inaccurate (though few doubt) :)
Angle "neither here nor there" (Pyrgus alveus?
More specific: this butterfly have to tie in a group photo # 29491; # 29492; # 29493; # 29500 This same situation that was Igor: it is impossible to relate in any way.
Opensource projects, eh ... nervously smoke aside :) "Magic" I have a balcony, but .... Already in 2010, the beetle-barbel Exocentrus punctipennis Mulsant et Guillebeu, 1856 was the first time for the Defense Set your humble servant from that balcony (in the book have Shapovalova). Link to my bug: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=238832&view=findpost&p=1075833 And now ..... probably ...
Infu add?
However, the species is not listed in the notorious Sinev to my home, the eighth region. The answer is: sfotat at home balcony in the city Railway, Moscow region :)
Thank you, Alexander again. Comments :) wash
Corrected data. Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov → Not identified.
Do not keep the transfer again somehow :(
Corrected data. Vasiliy Feoktistov → Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
That fact did not know that this banal Moth in QC home areas number: http://kkmo2.verhovye.ru/rb/bspozvon/lithina_chlorosata.php There, where it is full of photos, and to the border with the Moscow region only some 15 kilometers away :)
And apparently a bad case :(
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 27—31 mm.
Corrected data. Vasiliy Feoktistov → Alexandr Zhakov.
Less than three years :)
That same butterfly that http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/29492. "Final result" :) Merge the group had not received any :( Peter, do please :)
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
News
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
- 11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
- 11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community
New photos (24.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 12:51, P. Khramov: Да, в галерею можно смело дублирова...
- 12:48, P. Khramov: Виктор, спасибо, зафиксировал, сдел...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- The petition in defense of biological nomenclature
- Meantime in Japan
- New Zealand struggling with butterfly-killing plant causing monarch butterflies' death
