Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447... 497

15.02.2014 8:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27007

The second photo on the network will, however. The first on-demand at the bottom here: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-18/plate9.php

15.02.2014 5:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #26977

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Lymantria lunata / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.02.2014 4:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27571

Corrected data. Not identified → Ptilodon capucina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.02.2014 19:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27583

Corrected data. Not identified → Culpinia diffusa / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.02.2014 19:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27602

If variability, then it's truly amazing :)

14.02.2014 19:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27602

Is this really leda?

14.02.2014 19:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #26812

Yes, it's from someone volnyanok. And even of the tribe Orgyiini the goose is likely. Sorry, then pass ....

14.02.2014 19:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27599

det. Vishnyakov AN: soprovodilovka have in it the same and caught (no person in the local authors list) was defined as the Antheraea youngi Watson, 1915 here in synonyms from assamensis worth. Here it and threw. Come on, Aleksanr uploads. Interesting it :)

14.02.2014 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27007

Yes, I'm just worn out with it myself honestly. Thank you for Vasily definition. And no matter how he searched for her-zero .Ekz. something in my collection is worth :)

14.02.2014 18:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Plagerepne torquata

Alexander, indeed: how is it determined? It is interesting to swear :)

14.02.2014 18:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27598

Well, I'm about the same :)

14.02.2014 17:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27594

Alexander, a great source of Saturn: http://www.saturniidae-web.de/ Moreover, it has long been on the list of literature is.

14.02.2014 17:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27594

Corrected data. → Automeris midea.

14.02.2014 17:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27588

Corrected data. → Automeris themis.

14.02.2014 16:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27007

Sergey, 6cm roughly. Any guesses? The label is 100% reliable. Digged out all the we, no chance... Nearly went on vacation :(

13.02.2014 19:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27573

Imho doesn't look like one. Yet huge variability............ Regions should be checked. Now can do nothing with my cell phone, alas.....

13.02.2014 18:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27249

Corrected data. Not identified → Hypomecis crassestrigata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.02.2014 18:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27576

Corrected data. Not identified → Cleora cinctaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.02.2014 18:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27576

This species is identified correctly.

13.02.2014 13:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27099

Who's this Timothy? Funny :)

13.02.2014 12:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27099

Can't check today sadly :(

13.02.2014 11:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27575

Corrected data. Not identified → Pangrapta vasava / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.02.2014 4:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27572

Hint: Amphipyra sp. probably :)

12.02.2014 20:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27555

Corrected data. Not identified → Scopula immorata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.02.2014 13:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27546

Same here though these two species seem to be as variable as our local defoliaria........ Here genitalia exam could dot all the i's. Let it be jacobsoni :)

12.02.2014 12:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27553

Corrected data. Not identified → Idaea auricruda / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.02.2014 12:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27551

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

12.02.2014 11:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27548

By the way, is it the same specimen as #27539? Doubts.......

12.02.2014 8:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27546

Erannis golda ?

12.02.2014 8:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27546

According to Synev this is Erannis defoliaria areal. Well could be its male indeed :) Far East though...

11.02.2014 22:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #24123

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

11.02.2014 22:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3157

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

11.02.2014 22:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #24124

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

11.02.2014 22:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3156

Corrected data. Male → Female.

11.02.2014 22:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21042

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

11.02.2014 11:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27528

Corrected data. Not identified → Lymantria monacha / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

11.02.2014 11:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27528

So moving there considering its variability.

11.02.2014 11:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27524

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Calliteara pseudabietis / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

11.02.2014 11:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27523

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Calliteara pseudabietis / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

11.02.2014 10:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27528

Bet on Lymantria monacha male :)

11.02.2014 9:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27524

Caliteara sp.

11.02.2014 9:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27523

Caliteara sp.

11.02.2014 8:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27526

Supposedly Pyrrhia umbra ?

10.02.2014 21:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27471

Looking everywhere, finally opted Antheraea frithi. Please google and see how variable it is (there are few more similar variations) :) Guys, what's your thoughts?

10.02.2014 15:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27491

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Calliteara pseudabietis / Confidently identified / Female / Irina Nikulina.

10.02.2014 15:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27491

Agree with Irina basing on Far East. This is most likely Calliteara pseudabietis female: http://www.jpmoth.org/Lymantriidae/Calliteara_pseudabietis.html besides these two species have no distinctions in appearance according to the actual data. Genitalia only: "Calliteara pudibunda (Linnaeus, 1758) and Calliteara pseudabietis Butler, 1885 distinctive features in the outer morphology and genitalia ...

10.02.2014 14:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27491

Addition: female.

10.02.2014 14:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27491

Caliteara pudibunda ? Quite a one. This is Far East though.

09.02.2014 20:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27471

Irina, thanks for the hint. Tomorrow will be back home and first check those )