Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453... 497
Graphium sp. Can't say further.
The date isn't noticed which is bad. Suppose it's the same butterfly http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/26975 Or shot at the same time :)
Corrected data. Not identified → Papilio demoleus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Potanthus omaha / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Papilio demoleus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Surely it's a twin Papilio demoleus. Now moving.
Is it Papilio demodocus? Is it distributed in the Philippines? Or am I wrong about the species and this is something similar? Wouldn't risk so far to move it with such a location.
The ruler are to be blamed :) Should be solved decisively if to include it or not. Congratulations with the first photo of the species!
Just moved this out of the admin panel. Guys, let's not note genus on upload if you don't know species. In such cases upload just as it is, with no names.
Corrected data. / → Junonia atlites / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
To melpomene tentatively identified, right?
Right, didn't read till the end. This one is in synonyms there :)
Subspecies needed to be cleared as well. Alexandr please take it on.
Corrected data. Not identified → Heliconius cydno / Confidently identified / Andrey Polstyanoy.
Subspecies may be added by the author him/herself in the personal account.
Corrected data. Not identified → Heliconius cydno / Confidently identified / Andrey Polstyanoy.
Ypthima sp. Should check the Philippines.
Erionota torus ?
Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.
Yes, some addition also. Here is completely another specimen http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/26762, of better quality than this one http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/2952 which I think should be deleted. I'd like to correct my mistakes. Pity have no authority to delete or change.
Well then move that back... Two opinions alike :)
Well I'm trying, maybe not in a common way though... Just today uploaded two wingspread lycaons despite it already has such pics. This species varies a lot (multiplied here recently with lots of variations, especially females to collect). Wanna put them all here :)
Alexandr, I seem to have just only one specimen of this species, no choice, I wanted to try more pics with this one. Anyway, you are to decide which one is better :)
That's odd, I first had the same bug with that sylvia from the Philippines, then this one. Can't get.
Something wrong happens, already changed it twice: some weird bug.
To delete. Uploaded fresh images of this female.
Corrected data. Vasiliy Feoktistov → Ilia Ustiantcev.
Corrected data. Vasiliy Feoktistov → Ilia Ustiantcev.
Corrected data. Vasiliy Feoktistov → Ilia Ustiantcev.
Corrected data. Vasiliy Feoktistov → Ilia Ustiantcev.
Corrected data. Vasiliy Feoktistov → Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Vasiliy Feoktistov → Alexandr Zhakov.
This is to be deleted too due to the new uploads of pics of this specimen.
To delete. New photos of this specimen uploaded.
Corrected data. Not identified → Cupha arias / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.
Corrected data. Idea stolli / Tentatively identified / Roger Dolorosa → Idea leuconoe / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
Corrected data. Idea stolli / Roger Dolorosa → Idea leuconoe / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
Corrected data. Vasiliy Feoktistov → Basil Sergienko.
Corrected data. Vasiliy Feoktistov → Basil Sergienko.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Troides magellanus / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
Well many thanks: I'm nearly nothing in them and still have plenty of not identified noctuids...
To delete: uploaded a better photo of this specimen.
Can't get it, I already moved this to the species and still it's in not identified?
Troides sp. Can't say more with such an angle.
Corrected data. Not identified → Parthenos sylvia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Well then now you should note that in your personal account. Should be like this (screenshot).
Forgot to add, as a background I use common Whatman paper. Not printer paper which is too blueish, just Whatman. I think this matters.
You should note that here (see screenshot attached). I first tried this on one of mine, than move that back as it had been before. That's easy.
Should be separate section here for such handmade things. Would be interesting?
News
If you are not Molbiol user, just ignore the message below:
Пользователи Молбиола, перейдите на русскую версию сайта, чтобы прочесть об интеграции Инсекты с энтомологической частью Молбиола и о копировании форума на Инсекту.
- 22.05.2024: Еще одна цветовая схема
- 14.05.2024: Выложен первый полностью функциональный раздел перенесенного форума
- 09.04.2024: Recognition of species/taxa by file names of uploaded photos has become more convenient
New photos (08.07.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 10:24, A. Belousov: Просьба модераторам почистить эту т...
- 13:25, P. Khramov: Напоминаю, что открытие разделов фо...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Meanwhile, at the "Reptilium"
- Entomologist? What kind of job is it?
- The insects exhibition in Kotlas
- Forest Zoology, Hunting and Entomology Museum, Saint Petersburg
