Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455... 497
Corrected data. Neozephyrus japonicus → Neozephyrus brillantinus.
Corrected data. Neozephyrus japonicus → Neozephyrus brillantinus.
Corrected data. Neozephyrus japonicus → Neozephyrus brillantinus.
Will get the whole group done right now.
Corrected data. Neozephyrus japonicus → Neozephyrus brillantinus.
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Lymantria marginalis / Confidently identified / Male / Anna Gerasimova.
Corrected data. Not identified → Lymantria marginalis / Tentatively identified / Anna Gerasimova.
Corrected data. Not identified → Erebus crepuscularis / Confidently identified / Anna Gerasimova.
Corrected data. Spodoptera exigua / Zoran Bozovic → Acronicta rumicis / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Tired of waiting :) Grounds for moving: http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Acronicta_Rumicis
Or as a less clear variant, Subacronicta megacephala... You are to decide...
Acronicta rumicis, IMHO. Wait before moving. Other opinions needed.
Corrected data. Hoplodrina superstes / Zoran Bozovic → Anarta trifolii / Dmitry Borisyuk.
Corrected data. / → Smerinthus ocellata / Igor Sakhno.
Smerinthus ocellata it is, clearly. Moving.
Label?
Corrected data. Euplagia quadripunctaria / Zoran Bozovic → Opisthograptis luteolata / Igor Sakhno.
Yeah, indeed...
Corrected data. Male → Female.
Peter, it is necessary to correct the name of the species Daddala brevicauda Wileman & South; Holloway, 1976 to Daddala brevicauda (Wileman & South, 1921) some confusion in the network with it, that's messed up.
Now only Petr can correct this.
To Zoran Bozovic: it is subspecies Phycitodes albatella reliquella (Dyar, 1904) according to the classification adopted by the site.
Well, I got this species databased using info right from mothsofborneo.com. The name's there confusing, it says Wileman & South; Holloway 1976 whilst in other sources it's plainly Wileman & South, no description year. But on the same mothsofborneo it has also synonym Sypna brevicauda Wileman & South, 1921. Devil knows what's this?
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
So did it (couldn't find more reliable info). If something's wrong, will get it corrected.
Who described this species Daddala brevicauda Wileman & South; Holloway 1976 ? Can't get where it came from and where to put it in the database.
There is no such author in the website list, so I can't put him as identifier from outside. Such are the rules, Andrey, there's sadly nothing to do. The author of the pic can add a comment to this photo with the name of the identifier.
Corrected data. Acronicta rumicis / Zoran Bozovic → Anarta trifolii / Dmitry Borisyuk.
What's with the moderator on that webforum? This is indeed Anarta trifolii. Here's the right webforum: http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Anarta_Trifolii. Moving then...
Dyspessa salicicola ?
Dyspessa sp. (Cossidae) Who of us is good in this?
Grounds here: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=177650
Corrected data. Not identified → Rhodostrophia sieversi / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
To delete this kind of re-added (right).
To delete this kind of re-added (right).
To delete this kind of re-added (right).
To delete this kind of re-added (right).
Corrected data. Not identified → Minucia bimaculata / Confidently identified / Ozgur Kocak.
Well, let it be then :)
Corrected data. Zygaena punctum / Tentatively identified / Ozgur Kocak → Not identified.
Moving to not identified. Grounds here: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=475943&view=findpost&p=1457566 It was originally put as Zygaena punctum, obviously fault.
But if it's in Turkey for anyway?
Or rather more correct Zygaena (Mesembrynus) rubicundus (Hübner, [1817]) : http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki_vgl.pl?Zygaena_Rubicundus
I'd see it more Zygaena purpuralis (Brünnich, 1763) Any other suggestions more?
Corrected data. Not identified → Aloa marginata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Igor, thanks. This is indeed double: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/8828 Petr, I think this pic should be deleted.
Corrected data. Confidently identified → Tentatively identified.
Apparently worn-out. Moving to uncertain, I see.
It's rather variable: http://insectamo.ru/hete/91-hete/geometridae/1060-alcis-repandatus
News
If you are not Molbiol user, just ignore the message below:
Пользователи Молбиола, перейдите на русскую версию сайта, чтобы прочесть об интеграции Инсекты с энтомологической частью Молбиола и о копировании форума на Инсекту.
- 22.05.2024: Еще одна цветовая схема
- 14.05.2024: Выложен первый полностью функциональный раздел перенесенного форума
- 09.04.2024: Recognition of species/taxa by file names of uploaded photos has become more convenient
New photos (08.07.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 10:57, P. Khramov: Александр, переносим только фотогра...
- 10:24, A. Belousov: Просьба модераторам почистить эту т...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Meanwhile, at the "Reptilium"
- The insects exhibition in Kotlas
- The petition in defense of biological nomenclature
- Butterflies and music: Paolo Zavallone & His Orchestra, Papillon Rouge
