Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458... 497

12.12.2013 23:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25615

Corrected data. Not identified → Ypthima argus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.12.2013 22:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25614

Corrected data. Shamil Murtazin → Alexandr Zhakov.

11.12.2013 5:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25556

I added info about the species, referenced: this is very wide-spread (anywhere but America). Also accorded to some other data, butterfly mentioned in Ukraine, the Crimea (didn't add that though). The pupae origin is hard to guess, they rather were brought from Southwest Asia to Moscow (common thing, they come for further sale) :)

10.12.2013 19:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25380

Corrected data. → Gynautocera papilionaria.

10.12.2013 19:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25379

Corrected data. → Gynautocera papilionaria.

10.12.2013 19:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25379

Accorded to http://www.nhm.ac.uk Gynautocera papilionaria Guérin-Meneville, 1831 is actual. Added the species and the gender then. Moving :)

10.12.2013 16:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21195

Corrected data. Not identified → Sinarella albeola / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.12.2013 16:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21225

Corrected data. Not identified → Comibaena attenuata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.12.2013 16:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21225

This species is identified correctly.

10.12.2013 12:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9037

Corrected data. 0000-00-00 00:00:00 → 2010-07-17 15:50:00.

10.12.2013 11:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #23243

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

09.12.2013 12:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25470

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

09.12.2013 12:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25531

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

09.12.2013 12:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25471

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

09.12.2013 12:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25533

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

09.12.2013 10:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25543

Corrected data. / Aleksandr Andrianov → Hyles gallii / Fyodor Pudovikov.

08.12.2013 19:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25512

Corrected data. Vasiliy Feoktistov → Ilia Ustiantcev.

07.12.2013 23:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25510

Will move it tomorrow (now can't). Triodia sylvina imho.

06.12.2013 21:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11483

Dmitry, underside would be good here.

06.12.2013 20:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #23887

It seems to me Aporia hippia (Bremer, 1861) : http://jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Butterflies%20of%20China/03_Pieridae/framepage%20Pieridae.html What you guys think?

05.12.2013 22:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25374

Moved as totally agree with Irina, see no other variants.

05.12.2013 22:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25374

Corrected data. Not identified → Neptis andetria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

05.12.2013 20:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25487

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

05.12.2013 18:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #23251

Corrected data. Not identified → Pieris brassicae / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

05.12.2013 13:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #23251

UPD As I see, that's it, no thoughts of anything different?

05.12.2013 12:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #23251

Yury, this pic seems left from the previous website when there was no enlarge option, there are lots of such. Better to check Pieris brassicae on Alexandr Boldyrev's website (aka Sungaya): http://insectamo.ru/larva/35-pieridae/73-pieris-brassicae

05.12.2013 12:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25476

Corrected data. / Aleksandr Andrianov → Papilio oribazus / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

05.12.2013 12:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25468

Corrected data. / Aleksandr Andrianov → Papilio peranthus / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

05.12.2013 12:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25455

Corrected data. / → Cethosia biblis / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

05.12.2013 8:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25487

Or I got lost?

05.12.2013 8:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25487

They weren't identified, were they?

05.12.2013 8:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25487

Corrected data. / Aleksandr Andrianov → Chrysiridia rhipheus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.12.2013 8:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25488

Corrected data. / Aleksandr Andrianov → Chrysiridia rhipheus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.12.2013 8:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21185

Corrected data. Not identified → Sarbanissa transiens / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.12.2013 8:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21185

Yes, bingo. Thanks!

01.12.2013 18:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #24853

Corrected data. Not identified → Leucoma candida / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

01.12.2013 18:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25245

Corrected data. Not identified → Celypha lacunana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

01.12.2013 7:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #24381

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Pieris brassicae / Confidently identified / Female / Sergei Kotov.

01.12.2013 7:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #24381

Yes, forgot that: yet not awake :) Will do it now.

01.12.2013 6:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #24380

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Pieris brassicae / Confidently identified / Female / Sergei Kotov.

28.11.2013 17:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #23481

Corrected data. Sarbanissa transiens / Vasiliy Feoktistov → Sarbanissa sundana / Irina Nikulina.

28.11.2013 17:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25379

Neither I found it on funet...... Bad search?

28.11.2013 15:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #23481

Moved this to uncertain and it left comments for the photo page: some bug, perhaps.

28.11.2013 14:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #23481

Irina, thanks. These beasts are "genitalia" ones, should be examined in details which I've never practiced. Moreover, I've got only one specimen, don't want to damage it. Move to uncertain till then :) Meh.......