Comments on insects taxa, except for the technical ones
Community and Forum → Comments on insects taxa
Show: All comments in a row. All comments, except for the technical ones.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9... 15
Done.
It's not relevant, Peter
Amara concreta (Casey, 1918) - junior synonym Amara carinata (LeConte, 1847). This American species of the subgenus Curtonotus. Remove!
And right convexiusculus!
Polevikov! All come here!
I do not find Chorthippus parallelus - http://eol.org/pages/495478/overview
Ugums, see. To undergo treatment.
Probably, there was a view in the subgenus? Then he corrected.
Thanks to all! I believe that with joint efforts, the determinant will work for non-specialists
OK
Mistakenly had entered under "Distribution". Please replace with "Oriental: India (Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal).", The same source.
Let it be as it is until the person who will undertake to oversee weevils Postavte need only a comma)))
View from Egira conspicillaris visually different, male genital can be determined even in the live state, of course with the optical zoom.
It is necessary here are the names of the authors describe the cause in a normal, human form. These are cases where the author's name is written "CAPSA" no ukladavayutsya any one frame.
Yes, replicated this glitch, I look. Fixed.
While writing a thesis on the Geometridae moths of the Tver region (Russia), I collaborated with Elena M. Antonova (Zoological Museum of Moscow State University). She was the biggest expert on Geometrids (at least for the European part of Russia). I've got problems with distinguishing Dysstroma truncata and D. citrata. From Elena M. Antonova I heard something like this: "Don't worry, you couldn't ...
Not now, in the future, I think the opportunity is embedded.
Well, look. It slowly. I personally prefer more because now subspecies on the photo page is written completely (with the author and the year), but not in a truncated version :)))
Asus, only Asus!
An error in the name of the species, all the photos you want to transfer here http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/6873
Why do twice the same subspecies listed? Such a long list turned out.
According to this source ([9] Tree of Life (funet.fi), 2012), there is a subspecies Z. o. sangra (Moore, [1866]). Please add.
That tree taxa general form appeared - my oversight. Now they are removed from there. And, of course, no bindings fot the forms should not be only to taxa. He returned the pictures back. The forms are recorded only in the specification for photos or comments to her.
Thanks for the tip, fixed.
Hmm, on the wings of color - green. Interrogative. This refers to a reflection? ..
H. filigrama. http://www.nhm.ac.uk/resources/research-curation/projects/lepindex/ViadocsImages/Noctuoidea/Noctuidae/Hadeninae/199A/FC-Noctuoidea-Noctuidae-Hadeninae-199A-223933.JPG
Well organize the case. I've got to sample until a few such pairs))
With regard to review - now doing an updated tree nasekomyshey, including attendants (editing taxa base molding is locked). How to set up, if necessary, we will have to edit within the updated system.
Looks like a bug of some kind. He Added.
Leave - Butler described it in 1866! Felder describe real Euploea hewitsonii in 1865 !!! Everything is fine)))
And who will decide? This case is the curator of the group who does not live on the site .....
We have somewhere in the same way. 16 - July took a series)
Distribution: It is necessary to fix .... to the south of the Ussuri region. He had been Primorsky Krai.
Fixed.
I do not know, probably again with the option given in the literature.
Yes. Peter, in the column full name = icon are not only synonymous but a combination of generic and how could result in the literature. Could not be synonymous with Linnaeus described earlier, then under this name cited in the literature.
The fact of the matter is that this is usually a glitch in the site where there is no form of information about the Russian from Sinev. Therefore asked.
Photos need to be removed.
:)
I cite data from Svoge trusted source and it has data on all raznousym encountered in my region. These data obobshёnnye ie suitable for the whole area. This source is not in the office. literature (it is unique) and tell me no reason. It is enough that there is a significant infa there.So I spend a private message. I feed her only once on a birch. What have in their comments to the ...
Ugums.
Done.
Top shimmering wings?
People, and have someone thread alternative foty of this kind? Shtob colors more understandable. Or is it always looks like?
It is necessary to remove from the synonyms of I. p. feisthamelii (Duponchel, 1832) available in a separate view. Reasons for this photo: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/40769
The race has no species. It is necessary to clean it up.
Dolly in her land, or what?
Clean from the photo should be.
29.05.2014 14:00, Petr Khramov "And so sometimes the mix is not very fast" Just not fast :) The double page: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/11168 We must unite.
Yes, to do such a thing.
News
- 30.11.2024: Починена ссылка и страница «Мои подписки»
- 24.11.2024: «Поиск энтомологов» работает в полном объеме!
- 24.11.2024: We fixed an error in displaying the website in the "gray" color scheme
New photos (04.12.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 9:17, P. Khramov: / → Lithostege farinata / Nikola...
- 6:40, N. Grebennikov: Lithostege Farinata....
- 12:38, P. Khramov: / → Artena dotata / Nikolay Greb...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- The insects exhibition in Kotlas
- The petition in defense of biological nomenclature
- Butterflies and music: ASP, Schwarzer Schmetterling
