Comments on insects taxa, except for the technical ones

Community and Forum → Comments on insects taxa
Show: All comments in a row. All comments, except for the technical ones.

Pages: 1 ...6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

14.02.2014 18:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Plagerepne torquata

Alexander, indeed: how is it determined? It is interesting to swear :)

13.02.2014 14:36, Jean-Paul Herzet: comment on Catocala oberthuri

Hello I give you the photo of C.oberthuri from Spain Jean-Paul Herzet Belgium www.lepidopexchange.com

13.02.2014 0:58, Peter Khramov: comment on Cosmia camptostigma

Ugums, removed.

08.02.2014 19:45, Peter Khramov: comment on Chrysorithrum flavomaculata

The data transferred to this species.

08.02.2014 19:44, Peter Khramov: comment on Rhyacionia buoliana

Thanks for the tip, Fautua deleted from the description.

07.02.2014 23:50, Peter Khramov: comment on Donacaula forficella

Thank isravil.

04.02.2014 19:24, Peter Khramov: comment on Orthosia

Eddie, this is not an illustration Orthosia incerta, as an illustration of the subgenus Orthosia. But, nevertheless, you are right, corrected. ZY Please leave comments which relate to certain taxa (eg, subgenus) is on the page of podrada and not its parent taxa (as you do now).

02.02.2014 21:31, Sergei Kotov: comment on Cucullia fuschsiana

This page is a duplicate of this here: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/7125 Reserves subject to immediate removal.

02.02.2014 21:24, Sergei Kotov: comment on Cucullia gozmanyi

On this page a glitch.

02.02.2014 16:30, Sergei Kotov: comment on Catocala kotschubeyi

This page is a duplicate of this here: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/22421 Reserves must be removed.

02.02.2014 15:59, Sergei Kotov: comment on Catocala coniuncta

What a bug on this page.

01.02.2014 20:23, Peter Khramov: comment on Behounekia freyeri

Thanks for the tip, is ready.

31.01.2014 20:02, Peter Khramov: comment on Apameina

Eddie, thanks for the tip. Please unsubscribe at other times comments to leave it on the pages of these specific delivery.

28.01.2014 2:59, Peter Khramov: comment on Glottulini

Thanks, I've corrected it.

27.01.2014 22:26, Peter Khramov: comment on Eustroma aerosum

I rename this kind of double and removed.

27.01.2014 22:16, Peter Khramov: comment on Phyllodes imperialis

It's just a glitch at startup. Remove excess, thanks for the tip.

27.01.2014 21:05, Eddy Verfaillie: comment on Hadena bicruris

Apparently there is still a discussion about the distribution of bicruris and capsincola. If we follow the Fauna Europaea, then the photos of the species of Serbia should be capsincola and not bicruris.

27.01.2014 20:48, Eddy Verfaillie: comment on Hadena perplexa

The lower picture is not of Hadena perplexa.

27.01.2014 19:03, Eddy Verfaillie: comment on Mesapamea secalis

If there was no dissection of the genitalia, then it is impossible to make a difference between secalis and secalella.

27.01.2014 18:21, Eddy Verfaillie: comment on Aedophron

The thumbnail is one of a Papillonidae.

25.01.2014 18:07, Eddy Verfaillie: comment on Acontia

Put a thumbnail by the Acontia subgenus because "lucida" is represented.

25.01.2014 18:01, Eddy Verfaillie: comment on Chloephorini

Put a thumbnail by the Bena genus because "bicolorana" is represented.

24.01.2014 20:58, Peter Khramov: comment on Calpinae

What do you mean, Eddy? I don't quite understand you.

24.01.2014 20:57, Eddy Verfaillie: comment on Notodontidae

A thumbnail could be placed by the Hemiceratinae subfamily to indicate that there are species shown.

24.01.2014 19:12, Eddy Verfaillie: comment on Herminiinae

A thumbnail could be placed by the Macrochilo genus to indicate that different species are shown.

24.01.2014 15:54, Eddy Verfaillie: comment on Erebidae

A thumbnail could be placed for the Arctiinae subfamily to indicate that different species are shown.

24.01.2014 15:49, Eddy Verfaillie: comment on Phaegopterini

A thumbnail could be placed on top to indicate that several species are shown.

24.01.2014 15:40, Eddy Verfaillie: comment on Sauritinia concisa

It is important to emphasize that only the lower species is Sauritinia concisa.

24.01.2014 15:39, Eddy Verfaillie: comment on Cresera hieroglyphica

It is important to emphasize that only the upper species is Cresera hieroglyphica.

21.01.2014 11:28, Sergei Kotov: comment on Lasiocampa eversmannl

Vida called Lasiocampa eversmann l does not exist. The correct name Lasiocampa eversmann i (page here http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/6275). Double. It should be deleted.

20.01.2014 19:40, Peter Khramov: comment on Phengaris alcon

Stas is what you unsubscribe?

20.01.2014 13:38, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Dysphania palmyra

And in Seitz is. A modern bases, something not found.

09.01.2014 13:33, Peter Khramov: comment on Anticlea derivata

Thank corrected.

09.01.2014 13:33, Peter Khramov: comment on Acasis viretata

Thanks for the tip, changed.

08.01.2014 16:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Bombyx huttoni

I think it is necessary to remove all comments from this page. And it creates a separate subject devoted to issues zoonomenklatury, classification, etc., etc. The page type is somehow not quite good this discussion looks.

08.01.2014 16:07, Peter Khramov: comment on Bombyx mandarina

Ugums, corrected.

07.01.2014 2:58, Peter Khramov: comment on Dysphania ares

Thanks for the tip, fixed.

07.01.2014 2:57, Peter Khramov: comment on Itame chinensis

Thank corrected.

07.01.2014 2:56, Peter Khramov: comment on Asovia maeoticaria

Thanks, fixed.

07.01.2014 2:55, Peter Khramov: comment on Dyscia conspersaria

Thank corrected.

07.01.2014 2:53, Peter Khramov: comment on Chloroclysta siterata

Thanks for the tip, corrected.

07.01.2014 2:52, Peter Khramov: comment on Eupithecia biornata

The photo Pasiphila debiliata, as an illustration of this type of error remained. Thanks for the tip.

02.01.2014 21:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Daddala brevicauda

Peter, it is necessary to correct the name of the species Daddala brevicauda Wileman & South; Holloway, 1976 to Daddala brevicauda (Wileman & South, 1921) some confusion in the network with it, that's messed up.

02.01.2014 19:47, Eddy Verfaillie: comment on Thera variata

Following external caracteristics, there is no possibility to make a difference between variata and britannica. For the males, there is a difference in the antennae, only visible after enlargement. Otherwise, only genital examination can give a definite answer.

02.01.2014 12:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on

To delete this kind of re-added (right).

02.01.2014 12:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on

To delete this kind of re-added (right).

02.01.2014 12:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on

To delete this kind of re-added (right).

02.01.2014 12:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on

To delete this kind of re-added (right).