Photo #3140: Opsiphanes invirae

14.01.2011 16:45, Peter Khramov

Subspecies had been already removed. Signed "male".

14.01.2011 16:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin

Can't specify its subspecies having no label. Better remove subspecies and sign "male".

14.01.2011 14:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Maybe we should wait for Dmitry.

14.01.2011 14:20, Peter Khramov

Subspecies removed. As far as I can guess, Dmitry just compared two subspecies talking about cuspidatus, not commented this photo.

14.01.2011 12:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Petr, sure. Please, copy Dmitry full info as it is. I asked him personally to check mine.

14.01.2011 12:45, Peter Khramov

Sirs, let's sum it up: identifying is successful and subspecies info not, should last be removed then?

14.01.2011 7:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Needed for sure there, on website.

14.01.2011 5:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin

Just for the record, I have a true photo of this subspecies from Mexico. If needed.

14.01.2011 5:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Once was websearching for that, and thanks for remarks. We'll get them finally :)

14.01.2011 5:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin

How could you manage to identify its subspecies having no label??? And there is no such subspecies, this is synonym to Opsiphanes invirae cuspidatus, Stichel 1904, i. e. Central America.

16.07.2009 20:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Where was caught: no info.

29.06.2009 2:45, Peter Khramov

Photo goes to Opsiphanes invirae.

25.06.2009 19:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Opsiphanes invirae amplificatus, Stichel 1904: http://www.mundobutterfly.com.ar/Html/Invirae.html (layout is different though).