Positive temperature anomaly

Alex, I pushed it hard! ))
But about Japan - this is still a bit much)

No, they didn't invent the hungry Urals.
But Japan has been an American colony for more than half a century.
When using goods from the Urals, there is crying and gnashing of teeth (and metal), when using Japanese products - the joy of possession and smiles.
You can learn singing from a grasshopper, at least figuratively of course. But everyone learns to the extent of depravity.
On ulka -6. Snow was falling at night. It was dark, and the flood had subsided a little. In general, it would be better not to see all this.

Do you want to go blind?

The jump in my photo was caught before the trip to the Black Sea.
In summer, our temperature is higher than that of Pan Stepovoi,but now it's +2,and it's almost New Year's Eve.

Yes, some people need to correct their perception of reality, so as not to ask strange questions and make horrifying guesses.
I would like to live in another region that doesn't have this white snow for six months. I don't want to see him.
The Japanese have developed for half a century under the strict supervision and with the permission of the Americans, which is why so many useful things are created every minute for any inhabitant of the planet, and the industry of the Urals creates opportunities to destroy the world's population.
And the snow whirls, flies, does not melt....

I bought a mirrorless camera
And we have +4! Nikita, why is it hotter here? It's hotter here )))

Pictures:

P1270187.jpg — (136.96к)

I hope this is a mirrorless photo, not a mirrorless photo. Something's wrong with the white balance.

I bought a mirrorless camera

Congratulations! I once really wanted a camera with interchangeable lenses, but not a DSLR. The price was exorbitant, but it would have been fine if interchangeable lenses didn't often cost more than a camera. So I gave up the idea.

All Soviet lenses that cost a penny are placed on any mirrorless camera, except for the Pentax Kyu (see the Patskan dictionary) via an adapter. Of course, without autofocus, but it is not always needed. For example, in all the scenes that you posted here, the lack of autofocus wouldn't hurt at all. The price of old beushny bezzerkalki is a little more, than on your sodden nedopolympus. I would have taken it a long time ago, but we have a blockade, and in Donetsk itself the offers are very limited.

This post was edited by ENO - 12/23/2017 19: 37

Long-term forecast for January, however, as well as for February-zhzhzhot !!!
There will be no winter (tm)

Pictures:

glbT2mMonInd1__2_.jpg — (49.65к)

Yeah, I didn't have one, I remember.

The price of old beushny bezzerkalki is a little more, than on your sodden nedopolympus. I would have taken it a long time ago, but we have a blockade, and in Donetsk itself the offers are very limited.

I'd rather buy a lamp or something for the aquarium, but at least put it in a piggy bank.
Why do I need these perfect photos? Why and for whom? I can live without them.
I hope your blockade ends and you buy your dream. My dream was a marine aquarium and greenhouse. I did it.
I watched Canon A2000is on avito, you can buy it for a thousand rubles, the question is-why? Please explain why you need these photos. Why use a photo for the sake of a photo?

This post was edited by alex017 - 23.12.2017 22: 14

Congratulations! I once really wanted a camera with interchangeable lenses, but not a DSLR. The price was exorbitant, but it would have been fine if interchangeable lenses didn't often cost more than a camera. So I gave up the idea.

Well, not everything is so bad, but if you take the price of bu-shny mirrorless cameras(BZ) and bu-shny ones from native lenses , even old ones, then yes, the lenses are usually more expensive than the cameras themselves. If the new BZ, then in relation to it, simpler objects are certainly cheaper.

Sovdepovskiye obyektivy become on BZ, but not all BZS will work autoexposition without special problems, and on such BZS as Samsung the working segment is so large that it is almost like DSLRs, respectively. there will be no infinity on rangefinder objects.
And do not forget about the number of sovdep-objects

And the I26M object turned out to be quite good compared to the newer I61LD, much more contrasting, more detailed, but with special effects)

Aquarium for me. This is life, movement.

This post was edited by alex017 - 23.12.2017 22: 53

Alex, well, yes, life and movement in the aquarium ))

Expert as always - at dare)) But it's okay that Samvsung has 25, and M39 has 27, but is there an adapter? In fact, you can put an M39 on Samsung, but it will come and go, and sometimes it is impossible. In this regard, Fuji and Sony are excellent and 4/3 is at the limit, but also normal.

One of the photos on bezmylnitsu, the other on bezzerkalku, on one ISO 50 on the other 400, the frames are complete, arranged approximately the same, but BM objective Lomo F20mm, BZ Yu8 50mm, the difference in perspective - to take a picture on the BM the same frame, I had to go to the other end of the kitchen)

Pictures:

P1270227.jpg — (82.66к)


P1010062.jpg — (113.4к)

I suggest moving Panov's photos of light bulbs to the topic "cameras" and, so that it is not completely useless suffering garbage, write a camera model and post full - size photos. And then with such a wild resize, what a soap dish, what a non-soap dish - all the same in quality, below the baseboard.

Well, yes, so that the place on the forum ends again, as after constantly posting megashidevrov size of 3mb
In general, Ixpert's attraction to full-size images is a sign of photodroaching
So only a thousandth of 100% of the crop, and the camera model ekpert easily has to guess from the pictures, that's why he is an expert

Pictures:

22P1270227.jpg — (90.28к)


22P1010062.jpg — (112.08к)

An expert is not a psychic. But still, I'll try to solve the problem. In the first case, the grain is very clumsy with signs of cubism, plus color-bearing noise and chromatic aberration. The last two phenomena learned to push in the cameras a little earlier than the appearance of mirrorless cameras. Hence, it is a soap dish. In the second image, the grain is uniform, color noise and HA are completely suppressed - this is a mirrorless camera. But, judging by the fact that it's already so noisy on ISO 400, it's a Micro 4/3 or Nikon 1 of old models, and if it's still APS-C, then something from the very first and shitty ones. This is all provided that the camera run is shown, from which you can wind up anything, especially by clumsily twisting.

Even expertise in general, some kind of curve came out ))
Mirrorless in the first picture, and this is ISO 400, and in the second Olympus 480 and ISO 50, ironically this is zhpeg, I didn't shoot in RAV, although it was on Olympus, and I'm not going to, but it's still 4/3, which is actually easily determined by the geometry of the image by real experts

Here the first picture is ISO 50 bezmylnitsy in the shadows, following the ISO 200, 400, 800 mirrorless. In fact, these wallpapers are spangled with different colors, and bezmylnitsa does not show them at all, the BZ has at least a little something visible, and the BB is not correct here and there, it is sunny on the BZ, on bezmylnitsa, and in general the color noise of the CMOS matrix without processing is a harsh reality even for modern ones matrices, there are noise cancellations for this purpose.

Pictures:

32P1010062.jpg — (67.89к)


P1270232.jpg — (53.67к)


P1270235.jpg — (56.42к)


P1270236.jpg — (57.37к)

If the same ISO 400 in conditions of direct exposure in a corner (not on a light bulb), then the situation is already much better, ISO 100 is over even better, but who takes pictures on it ))
For comparison, the crop on the bezmylnitsa ISO 50 exposure on the corner.

This post was edited by Hierophis - 24.12.2017 01: 11

Pictures:

P1270241.jpg — (32.6к)


P1010064.jpg — (46.24к)

So, the third week of December is coming to an end. This week, in the Kherson region, we had frosts at night. In the morning it was possible to observe frost. Frosts are insignificant, up to -3 degrees Celsius, and during the day the temperature became positive. For the first two weeks of December, there was a positive temperature anomaly, and according to preliminary forecasts, it will come to us again next week. In addition to this December, I remember 2010, 2011, and 2015 with their unusual warmth for this month.

  
Cool, but what kind of model? I think I'll guess the firm if I say it's Olympus.

Almost guessed, but not quite, this is Panas In fact, it is almost the same, Olympus is even cheaper than BU, for $ 35 without an object on olx there are, but they are completely stripped down, without a viewfinder, and this is G1, although for 65, but in terms of functions and ergonomics, a classic camera, and most importantly- there is a viewfinder, all cheap Olympus does not have it.

I looked at the characteristics, it turns out that the Zh1 is also a specific kayak, other DSLRs, on the vastness and heaviness of which Pan recently rolled a barrel, will be more compact.

Ixpert broke through )))
Well, what to say, Alex was right, anger is a typical companion of such ixperts. )
Of course, I understand that the kodak 770 for the price of almost this BZ is definitely better than all these old dinosaurs like panas and Olympus, and I hope that the DSLR model, which is smaller and lighter than Panasazh1, still exists somewhere, but probably this is some other expert world that is inaccessible to me
In this world, clarity increases with the size of the matrix, and there are many other interesting things, I hope we will see all this live when our critic buys a Sony-nex for himself, and hits everyone with megafotks for wonderful "Soviet glasses", and a place on the forum server will fight for one too )

By the way, about the noise on nexes, here is a great illustration of what these noises are worth, fragments on ISO 400 in the right corner of Panas Zh2, everywhere except Sony, the noise dampers are turned off, and on nexes, the noise dampers can only be "weakened".
And if with monotonic areas everything is ok. that is where there is a grayscale detail. at neks, everything is much worse, Olympus has the most details on the head of the statue, then Panas, and on sonya, despite the noise suppression, the noises still came out, but there are fewer details.
But such experts as this - will take

Pictures:

______________2017_12_24_01_24_22.jpg — (112.37к)

By the way, I'll bet on vodka
https://www.olx.ua/uk/obyavlenie/sonu-nex3-...html#d766396a8e

We really have such a stub without an objective for $ 70 you can buy, but maybe they will sell it without an objective, and the shidevry will trample

Really Panu Zh1 together with a native curved lens for only 800 UAH cost? Then a really good purchase. But what kind of 770? 990! And its value is not in the noise, which, frankly, is no better than on the A540, but in the EFR=840 mm and stabilizer, despite the fact that there is still a wide angle and pseudo-macro directly from the front lens is also available. Although, of course, even the oldest mirrorless camera or at least a DSLR would have been at this price, I would have taken it without hesitation.

Expensive vodka. In addition, nex-3 is ancient, you need at least 5N. When I search for photos on that site, I set the upper limit of 5000 UAH, everything that is higher is not displayed for me - it is calmer. There was an NX1000 for 3000 UAH, it is not much worse in image quality than nexs, and with a whale lens, it is better, but the gnusmas, they say, have terrible plugs when recording ravs, and generally hang out of the blue. They only made the last two cameras good before burying this direction.

As for the drawings, we look at the upper-right corner and realize that it is empty. Regarding the complete shutdown of the noise floor in the ass of any of the currently existing cameras, Pan shows the height of naivety. Sonya here at least honestly confessed. Although it creates some obscenities with the rav, which is often blamed by competitors, but, it seems, it does not affect the results particularly. But whatever one may say, and if you compare the pictures on the network. made with the same lenses, if they cover ARS-C, sonins, from ravs correctly developed, as a rule, are noticeably better than those of competing systems, with the possible exception of such exotics as Fuji and Sigma. But from this picture, I realized that Panas's "parquet" is not the result of Panov's crookedness, but a proprietary feature, even Olympus does not have this on the same matrix.

This post was edited by ENO - 24.12.2017 03: 08

0.

+2.5 and rain

In general, seriously, there are criteria by which I chose mirrorless. Before that, I had the opportunity to experiment with mirrorless cameras, such as Olympus omg, fuji.
Considering noise is photodroaching, in fact, dubaya BZ normally takes photos up to 1000ISO with not very complex shadows, and if you reduce the resolution twice, from 4000 to 2000, then all noise disappears even at 1600.

Why I chose panas within the price I expected:
The presence of a viewfinder is a must if you are going to shoot wildlife, especially with manual optics. Even in the very first panas, the viewfinder is very good. The image is many times better than on DSLRs through optics, and what is important - at any aperture, and even at night everything is visible.
No stabilizer on the matrix. This is one of the first criteria along with the viewfinder. First of all, the first thing that crashes when the camera hits or shakes is the stabilizer, then you can not shoot in any modes, and I'm not going to treat the camera like a chicken egg)) Secondly, the matrix shaft without a stub is essentially sealed, there are only narrow slits for the shutter slats - and that's it. There is at least a handful of sand mound and mound-everything will be normal. And if there is a stub, the matrix shaft is full of cracks, dust is stuffed into it, which then falls on the matrix, no matter how much you do not clean it.
Of course, autoexposition works with non-native objects.
The working segment is less than 20 mm, and the shutter segment is less than 10 mm for easy installation of direct focus supershirks and M39 objects, which is why Samsung alas immediately disappears, although at prices cheaper than all the others.
Battery life - panas with manual objects have up to 600 frames on a single charge.
Classic ergonomics-stubs are evil, it's hard to hold without a grip, I saw for myself, shooting first on the Olympus 510 classic shape and then on the A480 bezmylnitsa. Classic ergonomics presupposes the presence of different discs and buttons, which allows you to change parameters quickly, reliable grip, and so on.
Turn - on time-panas turns on in 0.2 seconds and you can immediately take pictures. Not all BZS do this.
Dust and moisture protection - the panel is weak, but there are all latches with collars and rubber, no cracks, buttons with gaskets.
Built-in flash-Cobra-trifle and nice.
Rotatable screen in all axes - no need to substitute a mirror or lie down on the ground ) But the main thing is the ability to attach it sobsno screen inside, does not glare, does not scratch, does not turn on when not necessary)

Alas, specifically in this panas there is a terrible objective flaw - there is no video shooting. Especially touching is the inclusion of this in the "advantages" on many sites in reviews, complete nonsense. Probably this is the only BZ with such a glitch. In the series from Z2 and above, there are already videos in all price segments.
There is no confirmation of focusing on non-native objects. As a result, a lot of useful functions do not work. In Olympus there is no, on Fuji there is, on Sony like too.

Of the modern ones, I would consider Nikon 1V, the smaller the matrix, the better for macro, and even the scoop lenses only have a really good center, even on the 17mm matrix the edges are already washed, but I don't see anything other than the ikspert la la la anywhere that they wrote that it began to support non-native objects. Then panas and then fujifilm.
For 24mm matrices, you need to have at least something similar to the macro Tamron, and combinations of supershifts there will not work normally due to colorshift and moire.

By the way, about noise, ISO 1250 with and without noise reduction. And why pay for Sony-Nex, just because they have noise choking in the camera by default? )))

Pictures:

P1270289.v03.jpg — (91.52к)


P1270289.jpg — (112.76к)

+6
Here on Christmas Eve and Summer came for Alex )

Pictures:

P1270302.jpg — (51.61к)


P1270303.jpg — (49.81к)

Especially for experts, a photo on panas with ISO 400 and on Olympus SP510 with ISO 50.
The first photo on 2/92 just for fun)

Pictures:

P1270321.jpg — (43.11к)


P1270318.jpg — (48.66к)


P1021605.jpg — (55.38к)

Nda, +6 at this time of year and the lack of snow can only be envied.
The very climate, so to speak, the minimum requirement for it, in which you can live.
We still have -6, dark, sometimes snowing, by the way, the shortest daylight time, the day is about 6.5 hours, and you have two more hours there, in Ukraine.

Alex, it's already +8
Long live TVM)