Positive temperature anomaly

Probably the weather that we have now is like a Permian summer ) In the morning fog and +12 +15, and in the afternoon up to +25, yesterday even by 23 it was +21! This is quite atypical, high daytime temperatures are not uncommon, but night and morning temperatures are cool, so hot TVM for October is a rarity, if it was real summer now, then daytime temperatures would be +30, eh..
And albifrons balkonny died, it's boring without his singing..

Strawberries, cucumbers and snow outside the window - what a combination)))

And as for the dark forces and violations of the laws of optics-who has what hurts, so in the Middle Ages people were made "sorcerers", and various loafers, envious people and other types who signed up for" communists "robbed and" dekulakized " successful peasants who achieved prosperity by work and rationality.
Disassemble the lens and blacken the aperture-it seemed even easier, but alas
And by the way, it's a strange thing to hide the name of regular objects, okay, still alterations, know-how, however, but just buy and attach and make a secret out of it, fi

When the interlocutor promises to declassify his own know-how in exchange for the release of certain information, and then, after issuing it, takes his words back, then it is impossible to deal with him otherwise. Now, even if I buy a new camera, I'll keep it secret from Pan. Not to mention the lenses. Although specifically to establish the model of this-most of my secret all the information from pan by my grace is already there, you just need to be able to see. And as for the dark forces, behind the panov photos, their help is still visible. At least for a photo of 1/30 at EFR=200+, human hands are not capable of this without assistance. So, either the dark forces or pan are not telling you something important, for example, about a tripod or a stop. So it may well be that in his pictures of small-skinness, the real aperture is 8 or more, and, accordingly,also a stop or tripod...

It's easy to disassemble the lens. But, first of all, you need to collect it later without skewing the axis. If we are talking about Soviet lenses from grandfathers, then there is no need to stand on ceremony, everything is already skewed to nowhere, But if after leaving the factory no one disassembled the lens, as in my case, then another matter. But to blacken the diaphragm so that the coating does not crumble, including on the matrix, is no longer trivial, I do not know how to perform such sorceries. And judging by the available assortment, not all manufacturers were able to make them.

Yesterday, for comparison, I took a picture of a Yu-37a with a large macro ring. I don't know. what pan will see on the killed resizes, but when viewed in full size, the detail is much worse than with a secret lens. In particular, the scales on the wings of butterflies are difficult to distinguish. The contrast is also worse, but not significantly. Bokeh is much better than Zonnar. Although for macro photography, this is the tenth case. But the primary thing is the distance, it is ten times more than with Secret, butterflies are not afraid. In particular, I did not persuade Sovka-gamma to make a secret film.

Pictures:

DSC07890a.jpg — (285.84к)


DSC07898a.jpg — (256.64к)


DSC07901a.jpg — (261.8к)


DSC07919a.jpg — (261.94к)


DSC07925a.jpg — (296.89к)


DSC07930a.jpg — (250.89к)


DSC07937a.jpg — (294.42к)


DSC07949a.jpg — (206.73к)


DSC07968a.jpg — (329.66к)

And now about nature-the weather. Well, what can I say? Wonderful nature and wonderful weather. Calm, flying all sorts of "air plankton". But here only sonyshko will sit down, so immediately as if the heater was turned off, no Nikolaev +23, instead of them +10 and this is on the fence. It is much warmer in the city - asphalt, concrete and brick are warmer.






















I tried out a tricky mode on Nex-folding 6 frames to get a picture at dusk without moving your head. previously, I tried with other obetivami, but somehow it didn't go very well because of the low aperture and shitty enlightenment, but it went secret! Here-this trunk I at dusk in the forest thicket with my eye could hardly distinguish, it was enough just to bend down, walking along the path over which it hangs, and then not every time And in the photo with my hands you can even try to identify lichens!



The landscape is expected to be worse, but still better than you can see in the dark.



It's just a pity that this mode does not provide for correcting at least the white balance, not to mention the shutter speed and ISO. In subsequent models, it seems, the functionality was expanded.

Today the weather was exactly the same as yesterday, but here is the nature... For every fifty meters of the route, there were three groups of skewers, all covered in stinking smoke (for the coals command some terrible chemistry, probably from the desire to poison themselves and others), as a result of which there were almost no flying insects. I'm beginning to miss the days when the people were mostly afraid to go to Balka.

This time only 100% drops of kamjopeg without processing:











This post was edited by ENO - 19.10.2019 20: 40

Yesterday we had a small return of ZHPZ, in the afternoon it didn't reach +20, and after sunset it was immediately +11
In general, every day the sun is getting lower and lower, in the morning radiation fogs turn into inversion, turn into dull cotton wool clouds, which then muddy the sky all day.
But the orchid is going to bloom again

Pictures:

P2420782.jpg — (282.45к)


P2420805.jpg — (155.44 k)

Yyy, megaexpert, and also a terrariumist..
Nauphoeta cinerea, late Holocene!

We had a night of -7, a day of -6. Winter has come.

I'm sorry, this is terrible..
And we still don't see the end of the summer edge, it's not for nothing that we froze first in September, then in October, the" compensation theory", although unscientific, works

Pictures:

P2420573.jpg — (131.77к)

Not only everyone can determine the small larva of a cockroach to a species and even a genus from images through a yellow bubble substance. But I still praise Pan for admitting that he fakes amber with his own hands. I had such a suspicion, but I didn't voice it, because I still thought that Pan Stepovoi wouldn't stoop so low as to put out for everyone to see insects that were personally shitty in balsam (or whatever it is). Now, if it was real amber, the pictures would make some sense.



This post was edited by ENO-10/20/2019 10: 48

Even I have confidence that if this tarik is posted on the forums of fans of terrarium animals, then it would be determined very quickly

Pictures:

P2420855.jpg — (177.13к)

And I have confidence that if I post about a dozen species of other balaberids of this age on the forum, they will also be very quickly identified as Nauphoeta cinerea

And this is real amber?

Ty I thought megaexpert easily distinguish where the real amber, and where not real, and here it is)))

I showed a photo to one terrariumist, who immediately said: "Is this a marble in resin"

Unfortunately, I'm not an expert on amber and mosquitoes. A reptilian terrariumist or spiderman will see marbles even where they are not present, including dreams. But a cockroach terrariumist who has experience keeping more than fifty species of these beautiful creatures, and most of them are from the blaberid family, can see in this kind of pictures not only marbles. And what is in the resin is clear to a fool, but not in what kind of resin and what age.

So that's amber? By the absence of bubbles, I will assume that yes, or the pan still learned to fill correctly. I also have an amber pendant with a mosquito lying around somewhere, but I can't imagine where exactly.

This post was edited by ENO-10/20/2019 12: 01

Not, well, I certainly have very few varieties of tariks lived and multiplied, well, 10 species from different genera, but I don't remember anything even close to similar in the form of larvae, it will be very interesting to see the proof in the form of well, very similar larvae of another type of terrarium tariks

Amber and bubbles are inseparable friends, so it is very bold to draw a conclusion about the naturalness of their absence, but mosquitoes are still in amber. As for the "mosquito pendant", on the one hand, sciarids, trichocerids and similar midges are very common in Baltic amber, but it's all about the size, well, it's very rare that it exceeds 3 mm, so if there is something like a weevil or a large culex, then rubbing the product on the palm or jeans can be used instead of the smell of pine forests catch the same aroma of resins of the industrial era of the late Holocene

There's nothing wrong with my amber and gnat. Yes, it is less than 3mm (mosquito, not amber). But I saw him for the last time about 15 years ago. So if Pan wants proof, he'll have to wait just as long. And I also had artificial amber with a large mosquito somewhere.

They look exactly like the marbles I've seen in the tariks, but they don't look like they're alive. But, this applies to a living individual in the air, when you can perceive color and shine without distortion. And after the execution carried out by pan, it can be anyone at all, from pycnocelus to a newborn elliptorina.

  
Amber and bubbles are inseparable friends, so it is very bold to draw a conclusion about the naturalness of their absence

It's one thing to have bubbles, and another thing to have bubbles that are almost larger than resins. Still, Mother Nature fills much more accurately than Pan Stepova

And again all the same and all the same. Although not quite: an interesting flower bloomed, on which the polis feed, there were cerceris, philanthropists, some pompilids (not anoplias!). Even one elderly male dominula was unexpectedly found. And all because this time I came to the flower bed an hour earlier than usual. And in the beam on the occasion of Sunday there was an ass, the smoke was like a yoke, the reed was not set on fire-and then thank God. It was interesting to see how this smoke turns into a dense fog after sunset. But it wasn't interesting to smell it. I wonder what they shoot and where they get it. The local firewood smells good. the ants didn't fly this time. But mosquitoes flew en masse, and, alas, not chironomids, but those-the very friends of white flies.

I can't stop marveling at the coolness of my new sHidevrator. Here-this is probably the smallest flea I've seen, it's good if there is a millimeter in length, and all the facets can be counted:



What can we say about strekaz, here you can also otrezayit:



And I haven't seen a hundred similar head shots of Simpetrum from Pan Stevogyi, although I first posted my own on a similar scale (even on a soap dish) two or three years ago. Naturally, the trick is to keep the dragonfly alive and alert.

Last night, the frost let up, it started raining, and it became +3. Terrible mud.
In the greenhouse, I had to remove all the berries and prepare them for winter. I found another dozen frozen ripe berries in the process of harvesting. Now it remains to make boxes to protect rose bushes and young plums from hares.
We usually scold everything Western, but when you come home in the evening through the private sector, you go all in smoke. And in the West, it is forbidden to heat a tree, and even the place and time for barbecue must be coordinated with neighbors. It is forbidden to build bonfires, except in specially adapted places. And there it all works and is controlled. And the fines are substantial.
It probably stinks of purchased coal, no one wants to collect firewood. Here is coal, doused with vinegar and stinks.
Our gardens are deserted. Because of the sudden onset of winter, no one is here. Only soroki

No, what stinks most of all is some kind of fire-making slush and still purchased pine wood. Hardwoods firewood does not stink and smells nice, even raw. And still, barbecue slurry was invented in the West, In my youth we did not have such garbage and bonfires always smelled of bonfires (as well as fried meat), and not H. Z. than.

And heating with firewood is still useful for the environment in comparison with the alternative in the absence of gasification - a coal firebox. But we have so much firewood can only afford very well-to-do people, who always have gas in the house, but they need Kamyn. Ordinary people in one-story houses burn chicken charcoal, this is generally tin

I had cut down a dried blackthorn and cherry pile to my height, over 1.5 m high. I offered to take them all, but they refused. The pile lay for a year, buried under the tracks deeper. I don't have time for kebabs, but a lot of messes

We already have a fourth day of solid fog and the temperature in the afternoon is up to +16, well, at least in the morning +12
But even so, I've seen macroglossums near bouquets of flowers for sale!
But today at the flea market I bought another mega-objective, Vega 7-1 2/20
This is an amazing object, despite the fact that its optical part was in excellent condition, and as it turned out later, there is nothing wrong with the work, the mechanics there are just awful! In fact, there was no focusing, we had to disassemble it, cokes began to crumble during disassembly, everything is wedged, there are chips inside from drilling holes. the thread on the diaphragm is clogged, there are gashes all around, and this is despite the fact that it was not disassembled from the factory before, the cokes are painted over with paint!
The object is very similar to the World of 11M, and the factory icon is the same, but ideally on the World of mechanics, it also turned tight, but it understands perfectly, everything fits well, no scuff marks and shavings.
This is the whole Soviet Department, stability was only in the party's policy, but in the production facilities-each product is individually defective. And then I realized, these are traditional values, marriage should not only be in the Registry Office, it should accompany the Soviet person everywhere

I transplanted the lens block into the helik from G-44, and here it is, all the power and strength of the 2.0 aperture at 20mm This is in fact the first time I see such a thing so that on sovetskom , even if not a photo, but the film lens 2 the aperture was quite working, on Mir 11 it is also quite terrible.

Pictures:

P2430187.jpg — (143.73к)


P2430125.jpg — (152.08к)


P2430151.jpg — (316.73к)


P2430146.jpg — (128.47к)


P2430139.jpg — (407.21к)


P2430183.jpg — (112.05к)

Hole in a in the object-diaphragm
And what is the surprise of the photo expert, it is not clear, the usual GRIP for 20mm.
Bubbles
Aperture 2 and 5.6, pay attention to the characteristics of the object on which the focus is, they have not changed in fact! 2 even seems to show more details than 5.6, and of course the effect of separation from the background. In general, the maximum aperture gives the maximum number of details, any reduction in the aperture is a loss of detail, it's just very rare for Soviet objects when the maximum aperture has a minimum of parasitic distortions that clog everything, well, unless it is not equal to 4 )))

Pictures:

P2430199.jpg — (143.12к)


P2430219.jpg — (163.27к)


P2430243.jpg — (121.31к)


P2430241.jpg — (154.86к)

And in the diaphragm - a hole, preferably round and not in the shape of a star of David.

Looking at the snake willows in hole 2, but looking at the alcohol won't.

The GRIP does not depend on the focal length. Rather, it depends, but at the same time as the scale. So with the same scale, the grip of lenses with a focal length of 20 mm and 120 mm will be equal in the spherical case.

Given how the Vega 7-1 takes pictures on the open one, the aperture hole there will have the shape of a regular circle by default

About disbelief in alcohol, the photo expert himself wrote about the reason for this miracle, I just took a bottle of alcohol from a distance and made a crop, and a runner with 15 cm

But these are exactly full frames with scale preservation, three objects,
the first picture is Jupiter 8 2/50(from 80cm), the second is Vega 7-1(from 17cm), the third World is 11M(from 9cm), everything is naturally at 2.
In principle, the GRIP is approximately similar, but you need to take into account the change in perspective. And yes, how cool is Vega on the 2nd diaphragm fells?

Pictures:

P2430282.jpg — (126.37к)


P2430285.jpg — (161.15к)


P2430283.jpg — (140.82к)

I thought pan crop never does anything other than crop the vignette. But on you - descended. Maybe in a couple of years and before the outbreak descends.

It's strange: in the last series of shots, Vega still has a larger grip, and the picture is flatter than the other two, despite the fact that her FR is in the middle between them. But it could also be that Pan's focus on the World and Jupiter is shitty, so most of the GRIP is ahead of the alcohol. Were the excerpts the same everywhere? This is me to the fact that suddenly on the "Vega" the real aperture is not 2, but 2 with a tail...

And why didn't Panov's mega-model with the Iponsky helicoid take part in the testing?

And here's how my secret lens "fells" at aperture 2 (at the bottom-100% crop). However, I have alcohol a little bit of the wrong system - DNROVSKY. There is no such cool pattern on the label, only an indistinguishable pattern of cellulose fibers in glossy paper. But at least it is clearly indicated what solution is contained inside.




This post was edited INO-23.10.2019 11: 49

I don't remember what excerpts were there, but I very much doubt that in the USSR they would have written the wrong value, especially in plus, in those days it was customary to round the value to minus, so it's more likely to be 1.9 than more than 2x.
The focus was set on the left icicle of the letter T, and on Vega and Jupiter it is clearly the same, as can be seen from the uniformity of the grid, on Jupiter the grid is also visible, just disfigured by distortions. But on Mir11M probably the focus is really shifted. But in general, the ratio of GRIP to scale should be adjusted for perspective, so there is nothing supernatural about this Vega here

"Megasamodelka" has a focal length of more than 70mm, this is from two meters what is alcohol to photograph? Yes, and the aperture there is just more than 2x, although not 2.8.

And without a fly in the ointment in the optics of this Vega did not do, as is usually the case in objects from the USSR, this spoon is clearly visible on the picture of the page of the Soviet amateur photo guide, as the photo expert did not notice And this is surprising, because strong XA at open diaphragms are characteristic of long-focus objects, especially if they are lenses, but that at 20mm, it is necessary to try. When covering up, the XA diphragmas disappear, but still there is nothing good in them, and they spoil the image even when covered up.

It's a shame, it's already the fifth day of fog around the clock, even during the day you can't see anything and everything is covered in dew, but maybe they will take us to the EU instead of England

The object is certainly excellent at 2 aperture for 50mm shoots, which is not surprising for an object made not in the USSR, but to hide its name is the height of paranoia

And our weather is gorgeous, yesterday it was generally +19 with complete calm. But I've got a cold, and I'm sitting by the window. In general, most of my friends also fell ill with the same symptoms, not quite ordinary, which leads to suspicion about American biological weapons. It's not for nothing that they bought bacteriological laboratories in Georgia and Ukraine.

Probably all these RAV converters and photoshops were invented for this reason, in order to retouch pictures after the Soviet objects

Takes them, but who counts them.

Photoshop was invented to make ugly women into written beauties

The difference between a self-made object shot with 50 cm and a Vega shot with 10 cm, I think, is immediately noticeable
Very good GRIP, but of course, not every wasp will allow you to poke all sorts of garbage in yourself)

Pictures:

P22430426.jpg — (222.87к)


P2430393.jpg — (94.64к)


P2430386.jpg — (146.56к)

I hope it's homemade - the first picture, because the second one is "mutated GMO".

If there is skill, then even the most careful ones are allowed 1 cm away

But why is Pan doing photo hunting in the apartment again?

This post was edited INO-24.10.2019 21: 01

Well if the first picture looks like a 70mm object shot then yes
And examples of skill of course we will not see, well, at least some kind of cerceris with 1 cm, sleepy anopliusov to fotkat skill special is not necessary, but still anoplius on a flower with 1 cm, too, would not look bad in the form of a proof

Unfortunately, I don't know how to determine the FR of the lens from the rider's image without specifying any parameters. There were no psychics in the family. Well, if it doesn't look like it, then oh, the famous panov "watering can" drains And this "Vega" means it's still cool in macro, if it turns up, you need to take it. But they are mostly sold together with movie cameras for not very sane money.

Just take a picture of cerceris on a flower from 1 cm - no problem, if it's not a tuberculate. But anopliuses sleep in the ground, so you have to take pictures of those who are awake. But they love me, they even take me in their arms (I posted a picture of Pan once). And on flowers, they are generally much easier to take pictures of than in any other setting. For example, here:



Here, however, not 1 cm, but probably 5, but if there was a desire to take a picture from 1, so that only a piece of wasp and a piece of flower entered the frame, I would wind up an additional nozzle and take a picture without problems. However, I did not give up such a perversion in figs.

But God be with them, with the wasps, I want the head of the sympetrum! On Panov's photo, of course, and not on a platter.

This post was edited INO-24.10.2019 22: 20

Yes ushsh, anoplius here of course so-so, photodrochers on this usually say "I delete this before copying to disk"

By the way, what about (couple)batozonellus lacerticides? OK, okodemik doesn't have cryptoheiluses, because there are no tarantulas (in fact, there are a lot of cryptoheiluses that hunt small lycosides, but we also don't have the happiness to contemplate them on megashedevras), and lacerticides that are just full, where?
Here, however, not quite, to put it mildly, with 5 cm )) and not just anoplius and lacerticida, but still

Pictures:

P22290180.jpg — (93.19к)


P2280615.jpg — (120.49к)


P2290051.jpg — (90.97к)