E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Community and ForumInsects identificationIdentification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Pages: 1 ...141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149... 854

05.03.2009 12:35, RippeR

I identified my own as an Austriac-the pronotum border is not interrupted. the shield is more than 1u5 times the shier length..

05.03.2009 14:49, Cerambyx

Yes, Protaetia (Liocola) marmorata marmorata = lugubris. It was the pinkish illumination that distorted the beetle's coloration. (and not ssp. orientalis?)

No, the orientalis begins in Transbaikalia, and to the east is the nominative (according to the Medvedev fauna). Yes, and the knees are without white spots...

05.03.2009 14:57, Cerambyx

I identified my own as an Austriac-the pronotum border is not interrupted. the shield is more than 1u5 times the shier length..

Is there a notch on the tops of the elytra? What did you catch me doing?

05.03.2009 15:15, Sergius

Help us identify the barbels...

Pictures:
picture: P1060727.JPG
P1060727.JPG — (134.04к)

05.03.2009 15:22, Buzman

On the left - Aromia moschata moschata (L., 1758), and on the right - Monochamus sp.

05.03.2009 18:17, RippeR

galloprovincialis most likely

05.03.2009 19:19, Guest

It's like in bioexposure-the wings and whiskers are shown on the left, and the whiskers are shown on the right, but very long.
Likes: 1

05.03.2009 19:24, Cerambyx

I agree - this is M. galloprovincialis

05.03.2009 19:26, RippeR

Cerambyx: there is no large clipping.. Caught Trofim, this is from the same series.

05.03.2009 19:32, akulich-sibiria

Hello. Today I caught up with my bronzer to its logical conclusion))) This is indeed Protaetia (Liocola) marmorata marmorata = lugubris. I just didn't notice right away that the border along the lateral edge of the pronotum doesn't go all the way to the top and there are no white spots.Thank you for confirming it!!

05.03.2009 19:55, akulich-sibiria

Here's another question about a couple of bronzes. It seems that I go to P. metalica for everything...however, there are a number of differences between instances, although there may also be differences within the view.All were caught on flowers in Khakassia.
1. Dimmer.
picture: P8230001_.jpg
The sides of the pronotum are covered with short and not very thick hairs.
picture: P8230004_.jpg picture: P8230011_.jpg
The bottom is more dull and purple. The teeth on the front legs are as if erased, smoothed, and all 4 pieces have this shape.
picture: P8230013_.jpg
2. brighter, shinier. The sides of the chest are covered with long hairs.And the teeth on the front legs are obvious, sharp
picture: P8230002_.jpg
picture: P8230012_.jpg
picture: P8230014_.jpg
3 is very similar to 2, but the white dots on the body are much larger
picture: P8230015_.jpg

05.03.2009 22:16, Cerambyx

akulich-sibiria - all beetles of Protaetia metallica metallica. Mutable infection, but it's all the same.

05.03.2009 22:19, Cerambyx

Caught Trofim, this is from the same series.

So everyone should be quercus. At Aurata, the same shape of the shield is changeable by the way... And on what caught? austriaca is a monophage on fir, if on deciduous-by definition not that.

This post was edited by Cerambyx-05.03.2009 22: 21

05.03.2009 23:39, RippeR

then kuerkus )

07.03.2009 0:36, Vitalin

Take a look, please. Is this something from Acmaeops? 10mm
60 km south of Irkutsk.

This post was edited by Vitalin - 07.03.2009 00: 39

Pictures:
picture: Ceramb_01.jpg
Ceramb_01.jpg — (108.77к)

07.03.2009 0:59, RippeR

looks like acmeops)
Likes: 1

07.03.2009 10:39, Borka

I think Acmeops septentrionis.
Likes: 1

08.03.2009 13:12, VBoris

Help with the following beetles, please.

Pictures:
picture: schelkun1.jpg
schelkun1.jpg — (54.35к)

picture: rogach1.jpg
rogach1.jpg — (61.89к)

picture: schelkun2.jpg
schelkun2.jpg — (47.64к)

picture: schelkun3.jpg
schelkun3.jpg — (57.31к)

picture: schelkun5.jpg
schelkun5.jpg — (30.99к)

picture: schelkun6.jpg
schelkun6.jpg — (21.9к)

picture: schelkun7.jpg
schelkun7.jpg — (40.06к)

08.03.2009 14:00, RippeR

rogach1 - Spondylis buprestoides
Likes: 1

08.03.2009 21:59, Fornax13

schelkun1.jpg and schelkun2.jpg -Agrypnus murinus
schelkun5.jpg -Dalopius marginatus
schelkun6.jpg -The Athous type can be used haemorrhoidalis?schelkun7.jpg
- ? Hemicrepidius niger

schelkun3.jpg " I'd like to turn it around." In my opinion, something simple.
Likes: 1

09.03.2009 12:47, Liparus

Help me identify the Lixus beetles
with a length of about 14 mm

This post was edited by Liparus - 09.03.2009 12: 49

09.03.2009 15:34, Fornax13

1 - For some reason I immediately associate it with Phyllobius argentatus. Keep your eyes open for this genus, or I don't know the phyllobiuses very well.
2,3 - Lixus (Epimeces) cardui Olivier, 1807
4 - Protaetia (Cetonischema) aeruginosa. I don't remember any others like that.
Likes: 1

09.03.2009 16:07, А. Лебедев

Can you tell me what kind of bug it is? Photographed at the end of June in the Elbrus region.

Pictures:
picture: ____1_1_.JPG
____1_1_.JPG — (45.92к)

09.03.2009 17:04, akulich-sibiria

Alexey, here's another Aphodius. Very similar to A. rectus, but the posterior corners of the pronotum are completely edged!! but you'll also be lucky...That's what confuses me. I have found about 6 different forms of A. rectus ,from almost yellow to completely black. I'm having a hard time with this. I'm leaning towards A. caspius, but I'm not sure. It is very similar to the beetle from page 110, but in this specimen the spot is more clearly bounded, the legs are black (in that one they are brown). Frontal suture with tubercle. The top of the elytra is very slightly pubescent. But the apical spur is anterior. the lower leg is bent inwards.
picture: P8240020_.jpg
picture: P8240022_.jpg

2 here's another one, leaning towards A. melanostictus...5.5 mm. The platband is slabovyamchatyy. There are red spots on the sides of the pronotum. The feet are brown. And a distinctive pattern on the elytra. The base of the pronotum is bordered, the posterior corners are rounded, without a notch.
picture: P8250030_.jpg

3 and here's another one. The casing is rough-grained. On its leading edge, two prongs are very noticeable. A. multiplex can be...
picture: P8250032_.jpg
picture: P8250031_.jpg

This post was edited by akulich-sibiria-09.03.2009 17: 09

09.03.2009 17:19, Fornax13

1 - A. rectus ab. biformis. All right.
2 - it is quite possible. Was it determined by Frolov?
3-IMHO Mendidius, but not multiplex. A. bidens is quite likely.

This post was edited by Fornax13-09.03.2009 17: 30

09.03.2009 17:44, akulich-sibiria

1 - A. rectus ab. biformis. All right.
2 - it is quite possible. Was it determined by Frolov?
3-IMHO Mendidius, but not multiplex. A. bidens is quite likely.


that is, the rectus can be and the corners are edged??
By A.bidens I'll take a look. I just don't remember that the front edge of the pronotum is bordered...I'll find out tomorrow.
I determine the partial composition of Kazakhstan and Wed.Asia. and also in the Far East.And what is the Frolov determinant?? ..

09.03.2009 17:44, Fornax13

Likes: 1

09.03.2009 17:48, Fornax13

Yes, they have ambiguous situations: here the corners seem to be edged, but the border is weak.
The bidens seems to have a fringed leading edge.
You can download it on the Zino website. Frolov's work on subg. Chilothorax.

09.03.2009 18:00, akulich-sibiria

Yes, they have ambiguous situations: here the corners seem to be edged, but the border is weak.
The bidens seems to have a fringed leading edge.
You can download it on the Zino website. Frolov's work on subg. Chilothorax.


it's a pity it's in English. frown.gif but very good info, thank you.

09.03.2009 18:08, Fornax13

And what do I have in Russian? smile.gif

09.03.2009 18:20, akulich-sibiria

once such a topic has gone, here I still have a question about the lamellar sawyers. Whether both Phyllopertha horticola specimens are found..just a second specimen with no hairs on the upper wings at all ...
1.picture: P8170106_.jpg
picture: P8170108_.jpg
picture: P8170110_.jpg
2.picture: P8170105_.jpg
picture: P8170107_.jpg
picture: P8170109_.jpg

09.03.2009 19:25, akulich-sibiria

I found such a staphylin on the monster
picture: P7310040_.jpg
picture: P7310041_.jpg

09.03.2009 19:31, Fornax13

Can prsp. and the head more pochetche with oblique light? I'll assume that this is Samets Aploderus ?caesus (Oxytelinae).

This post was edited by Fornax13-09.03.2009 19: 59

10.03.2009 12:18, Stavropolec

Can you tell me??
Astrakhan region, 05.2008

Pictures:
picture: 6.jpg
6.jpg — (102.53к)

10.03.2009 12:42, Cerambyx

[quote=Stavropolec,10.03.2009 14:18]
Likes: 1

10.03.2009 20:27, akulich-sibiria

Good evening. I will continue the topic of aphodiuses.
1. 6 mm. reddish-brown, pronotum and head darker. Scutes on the last legs are the same. The spur on the hind legs is larger than the 1st segment of the foot. The apex of the elytra is shagged and dotted.
I go to the subgenus Bodilus with the view here a lot of things sordidus or nitidulus (in green), and maybe scybalarius
picture: P8290046_.jpg
picture: P8290047_.jpg
2. As I believe from the genus of Heptaulacus..the view is more complicated. can carinatus
picture: P8290051_.jpg

3. picture: P8290056_.jpg

and also of the same kind, I understand.but all red

4.picture: P8290052_.jpg
picture: P8290053_.jpg

10.03.2009 22:18, Fornax13

Heptaulacus first 2-carinatus. Red-haired-probably, too. If the other one is different, then it may be very interesting. And where does it go on green or Kazakhstan?
Aphodius-yes, from that series. I would say that it is similar to rufus (which is scybalarius). You can take a look at the DV.

This post was edited by Fornax13-10.03.2009 22: 28

11.03.2009 6:52, Guest

I can't go anywhere by the red Heptaulacus. thought H. sus.... but also not suitable.
And everything is difficult for red...According to different determinants, you get to different but close views...one subgenus. The same scybalarius is described a little differently)))
And for A. comma, I stopped at it so far, only there is ab. incoma, which is completely without dots. Tell me when we watch shin guards. do you only need to look at the rear or middle ones??..I have some of the same species on some, different on others. I will continue to fight them))

11.03.2009 19:00, akulich-sibiria

Good evening. Alexey, I've been tinkering with red aphodius. According to three different determinants, I go to different types. There are about 7 species of them in total. And everyone has something that doesn't fit. In green, he entered A. scybalarinus, and in the qualifiers for Wed.But in general, this species was synonymous with A. rufus, so I decided on this option. According to Frolov, I found Chilothorax melanostictus fairly easily. (Thank you for the link). According to A. comma, I stopped at it, only at its incomma form, which is without dots at all.
Here are some more beetles.
1. As I understand it, this is A. (Acrossus) rufipes...??
picture: P8290059_.jpg
picture: P8290060_.jpg
2. Stopped at A. immundus, does anyone else have teeth on their shoulders..??
picture: P8300061_.jpg
picture: P8300063_.jpg
picture: P8300064_.jpg
3. This is more difficult. 4 mm. The bristles on the shins are of different lengths. There are lighter spots on the sides of the pronotum. The spur on the hind legs is smaller than the 1st segment of the foot. The forehead is without bumps, The legs are dark brown. The shield is slightly extended. I go out for A. pusillus, A. serotinus or A. tomentosus, but I haven't seen them in my eyes. Maybe there will be opinions about this.
picture: P8300066_.jpg
picture: P8300067_.jpg

11.03.2009 20:16, Fornax13

1-yes 2-98
percent
3-alas, I don't know anymore weep.gif
What is not pusillus and not tomentosus is unequivocal. serotinus - maybe, but I can't imagine this species very well (it seems to me that it should be without a light border on the prsp).
Maybe it makes sense to start gluing small beetles? Otherwise, there will be problems with them wink.gif
I still don't like the comma. A photo of the bristles on the shins would not be superfluous.
Pictures of many European species can be viewed here:
http://www.colpolon.biol.uni.wroc.pl/aphodius.htm
In general, there is a check for aphodia b. USSR:
http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/coleoptera/rus/aphodii.htm
And in a good way, I advise you to download it, if there is any interest in aphodia:
http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/coleoptera/rus/balthas3.htm

This post was edited by Fornax13-11.03.2009 22: 43

Pages: 1 ...141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149... 854

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.