Insecta.pro → Catalog Gallery Taxonomy References Maps Community More

✖

Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Community and Forum → Insects identification → Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Pages: 1 ...207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215... 854

06.10.2009 22:55, Алексей Сажнев

75. Adalia (Adalia) decempunctata (Linnaeus, 1758)
78. Cortodera femorata (Fabricius, 1787) I so understand

Likes: 1

06.10.2009 23:08, Fornax13

71, 72-Lochmaea capreae
73-Cantharis nigricans like
74-Hylobius ?pinastri
75-Hylobius, mozh, and abietis

Likes: 1

06.10.2009 23:43, RippeR

about kortodyra-verno

07.10.2009 8:03, Mantispid

Need help identifying the following weevils!
In 2006, they were defined as:
Pseudocleonus cinereus (Schrank, 1781)
Larinus jaceae (Fabricius, 1775)
Lixus albomarginatus Boheman, 1843
All Saratovskoe!

This post was edited by Mantispid - 07.10.2009 08: 03

07.10.2009 8:31, evk

Need help identifying the following weevils!
In 2006, they were defined as:
Pseudocleonus cinereus (Schrank, 1781)
Larinus jaceae (Fabricius, 1775)
Lixus albomarginatus Boheman, 1843
All Saratovskoe!

Pseudocleonus cinereus (Schrank, 1781) - Yes!
Larinus jaceae (Fabricius, 1775) - Similar in color and pubescence. But the body shape (proportions of elytra) and cephalotubes differ from the specimens. in my collection, identified by B. Korotyaev.
picture: Larinua_jaceae.jpg

I'm not sure if the definition is correct. What is the body size of your jaceae?
Lixus albomarginatus Boheman, 1843-Yes!

This post was edited by evk-07.10.2009 08: 40

Likes: 1

07.10.2009 9:46, Mantispid

Likes: 1

07.10.2009 10:01, Fornax13

To Mantispid:
1-Pseudocleonus cinereus-exactly
2-Larinus - not jaceae, IMHO generally from another opera. I would say something from sensu stricto. The size you need and what you were sitting on.
3 - What is the size of Lixus? I would say-generally L. myagri. It's too massive for Compsolixus.

07.10.2009 13:48, Алексей Сажнев

about kortodyra-right

well, in the Ministry of Defense there is nothing else like)))

07.10.2009 13:50, Алексей Сажнев

Need help identifying the following weevils!
In 2006, they were defined as:
Pseudocleonus cinereus (Schrank, 1781)
Larinus jaceae (Fabricius, 1775)
Lixus albomarginatus Boheman, 1843
All Saratovskoe!

I also think lixus L. myagri

07.10.2009 14:17, Mantispid

If Lixus is miagri, then all my other lixuses are not miagri, that's the question)))) I'll post a couple of photos of different liksuses later. In the meantime, I would like to resolve the issue with Larin - I indicated the dimensions-11-12 mm, the female and male sat and copulated on a random plant.

07.10.2009 14:46, Victor Titov

Batch # 8, the quality is also not a fountain...
All but 73 and 75 were taken in the vicinity of Krasnoarmeysk, Moscow region
80. 31.05.2009
Clytra laeviuscula?

I believe this is Clytra quadripunctata.

Likes: 1

07.10.2009 15:34, omar

Clytra laeviuscula we just don't have

07.10.2009 15:41, vasiliy-feoktistov

I believe this is Clytra quadripunctata.

C. quadripunctata is.

07.10.2009 16:02, Victor Titov

Clytra laeviuscula we simply don't have

That's what I mean

C. quadripunctata is.

Likes: 1

07.10.2009 17:23, evk

To Mantispid:
2-Larinus - not jaceae, IMHO generally from another opera. I would say something from sensu stricto. The size you need and what you were sitting on.
3 - What is the size of Lixus? I would say-generally L. myagri. It's too massive for Compsolixus.

About Lixus - and I was in a hurry

Most likely you are right - myagri!

Likes: 3

07.10.2009 17:34, Fornax13

myagri is very different. Even from a single collection. Well, you can post the rest, if you want

11-12 mm - no nose?

07.10.2009 18:25, Mantispid

myagri is very different. Even from a single collection. Well, you can post the rest, if you want
11-12 mm - no nose?

There is a wild desire to understand ) and 11 mm is with the nose, I tried it on, because this is a head tube, a continuation of the head.

Well, it means this: (I apologize right away - the pictures are weird because it's already evening in Saratov)
1.+2. Lixus myagri (Olivier, 1807) (what I defined as miagri) + Larinus vulpes Olivier, 1807 in my understanding.
3. Lixus fasciculatus? + he is also on his side, male, caught on Arctium lappa L., 14 mm with a nose
of 4. Lixus myagri ? + it is also on the side, collected by mowing, kormovukha is not known), 11 mm with a nose

This post was edited by Mantispid - 07.10.2009 18: 30

07.10.2009 18:37, Fornax13

3-fasciculatus, yes. 1 - also it, I would say

2-vulpes aga
4-Lixus subtilis. He lives in the Marevs.

Elephants without gtr. it is necessary to measure. The first two larinuses reminded me of L. brevis at first, but I did not collect this species in nature (something is very poorly caught), although the infestation of carlin baskets is rabid.

This post was edited by Fornax13-07.10.2009 18: 44

Likes: 1

07.10.2009 19:17, Mantispid

Thank you very much! I will measure in sl. times without gtr.)))
I would certainly like to hear someone else's opinion!

p. s. Sarlina - something familiar thorn)))))

07.10.2009 19:25, Fornax13

We have Karlina here something like this looks:
http://flora.nhm-wien.ac.at/Seiten-Arten/C...steinii-bre.htm
You also have this view.

This post was edited by Fornax13-07.10.2009 19: 25

Likes: 1

07.10.2009 19:50, NicoSander

Vologda region, Kaduysky district, okr. d. Pakino, under the bark of a pine stump, 4. 10. 2009 Tell me who

Pictures:
picture: 1.jpg

1.jpg — (167.24 k)

picture: 2.jpg

2.jpg — (132.72 k)

07.10.2009 19:53, Алексей Сажнев

1. Rhagium (Rhagium) inquisitor inquisitor (Linnaeus, 1758) female
2. Pytho depressus (Linnaeus, 1767)

Likes: 1

07.10.2009 20:37, Liparus

Need help identifying the following weevils!
In 2006, they were defined as:
Larinus jaceae (Fabricius, 1775)

http://www.colpolon.biol.uni.wroc.pl/larinus%20brevis.htm

maybe he is?
I have such as you have in the photo is in the collection(I did not catch it)and no one defined it yet

08.10.2009 20:04, Алексей Сажнев

Bembidion sp.
Novgorodskaya guberniya, Ust-Volma

the quality leaves much to be desired

Pictures:
picture: PA080004.jpg

PA080004.jpg — (355.64к)

08.10.2009 20:16, evk

Bembidion sp.
Novgorodskaya guberniya, Ust-Volma

the quality leaves much to be desired

Bembidion lampron/properans - it's useless to distinguish between photos!

Likes: 1

08.10.2009 20:16, Алексей Сажнев

Thank you, I will look at the house under binocular

08.10.2009 22:01, Алексей Сажнев

Bembidion properans (Stephens, 1829)

Likes: 1

08.10.2009 23:33, okoem

What is the fan-bearer's name? Length 7 mm. Crimea, steppe on the seashore, October 7, 2009.

Pictures:
picture: IMGP1083.jpg

IMGP1083.jpg — (43.1к)

09.10.2009 7:34, akulich-sibiria

good afternoon. Tell me at least up to the genus of these beetles
1. pine forest
picture: P3290109_.jpg

2. ibid.

3. Can A. balteatus have only the tip of the elytra black? or is it a different view?
picture: P3270104_.jpg

09.10.2009 8:01, evk

good afternoon. Tell me at least up to the genus of these beetles
1. pine forest
2. ibid
. 3. can A. balteatus have only the tip of the elytra black? or is it a different view?

1- Philonthus sp.
2-I don't
know 3 - Probably Ampedus praeustus (Fabricius, 1792)

Likes: 1

09.10.2009 8:07, evk

What is the fan-bearer's name? Length 7 mm. Crimea, steppe on the seashore, October 7, 2009.

It seems to be Rhipidius. I've never seen it - it's a rare thing. Possibly R. apicipennis Kr.

Likes: 1

09.10.2009 9:24, akulich-sibiria

[quote=evk,09.10.2009 13:01]

09.10.2009 10:28, Fornax13

What is the fan-bearer's name? Length 7 mm. Crimea, steppe on the seashore, October 7, 2009.

Ripiphorus subdipterus

Likes: 2

09.10.2009 11:39, evk

Ripiphorus subdipterus

Ripiphorus subdipterus has a yellow upper abdomen, antennae, and legs (except the thighs). In addition, here the antennae are clearly attached (seen, of course, so-so) in no way on the crown between the back edges of the eyes. Well, the shape of the elytra ...
R. subdipterus is not uncommon here. This one doesn't look like it.
My R. subdipterus looks like this (the picture is so-so, but visible)
picture: Rhipiphorus_subdipterus.jpg

09.10.2009 15:01, Fornax13

Well this miracle IMHO especially does not look like:
http://www.galerie-insecte.org/galerie/vie...Fmaikesdonc.jpg
In addition, they are even smaller.
The color of the abdomen varies, the legs-so it is, just the lighting is weak. I can't see the base of the whiskers at all, but rhipidius has eyes that take up almost the entire head, which this beetle doesn't have.
The only thing from the Crimea is a male, and you have a female.

Likes: 3

09.10.2009 15:42, evk

Well this miracle IMHO especially does not look like:
http://www.galerie-insecte.org/galerie/vie...Fmaikesdonc.jpg
In addition, they are even smaller.
The color of the abdomen varies, the legs-so it is, just the lighting is weak. I can't see the base of the whiskers at all, but rhipidius has eyes that take up almost the entire head, which this beetle doesn't have.
The only thing from the Crimea is a male, and you have a female.

Yes, there are also males, but after looking at what Rhipidius looks like, I won't even argue - it's certainly Ripiphorus, maybe the same subdipterus. It's just that I've never seen such black people in my area.

Likes: 3

09.10.2009 17:45, VSB

I looked at the identifier and it looks like this Elephant beetle is aquatic.Whether it is an Elephant and whether it is possible to determine its type. Taken in Chelyabinsk. July 2009.

Pictures:
picture: _____________.jpg

_____________.jpg — (90.13к)

09.10.2009 18:27, evk

I looked at the identifier and it looks like this Elephant beetle is aquatic.Whether it is an Elephant and whether it is possible to determine its type. Taken in Chelyabinsk. July 2009.

This is definitely an "elephant" - that is, a species from the family of weevils (Curculionidae). Approximately 400-500 species of "elephant" live in your region.
Do not give such names as "water elephant"! Such names don't mean anything, and discard any qualifiers (so-called) that don't include Latin.
In the photo, a weevil from the genera Eusomus-Euidosomus. I can't tell them apart from the photo. Here's a look at someone who specializes in this company and maybe. he'll tell you.

Likes: 1

09.10.2009 18:56, Fornax13

Well, according to habitus - Eusomus ovulum honest.

Likes: 3

09.10.2009 20:47, NakaRB

Batch # 9, still poor quality

81. Moscow, Bitsevsky forest Park, 05.06.2009, on the nettle
user posted image

82. Moscow, Bitsevsky forest
Park - one view
05.06.2009
user posted image

07.06.2009
user posted image

83. Moscow, Bitsevsky forest Park, 05.06.2009
Oedemera lurida?
user posted image

84. Moscow, Bitsevsky forest Park, 05.06.2009
Cantharis pallida?
user posted image

85. vicinity of Krasnoarmeysk, Moscow region, 06.06.2009
Polydrusus undatus?
user posted image

86. surroundings of Krasnoarmeysk, Moscow region, 06.06.2009, on
Linaeidea aenea alder?
user posted image

87. vicinity of Krasnoarmeysk, Moscow region, 06.06.2009
user posted image

88. vicinity of Krasnoarmeysk, Moscow region, 06.06.2009
user posted image

89. Moscow, Bitsevsky Forest Park, 07.06.2009
user posted image

90. Moscow, Bitsevsky Forest Park, 07.06.2009
user posted image

Pages: 1 ...207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215... 854

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

News

24.11.2024: «Поиск энтомологов» работает в полном объеме!
24.11.2024: We fixed an error in displaying the website in the "gray" color scheme
17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».