Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Batch # 4, Moscow and the region

31. He
39. Oedemera virescens
40. Он

Can you help me with the nutcrackers? MO, May.

1. Agriotes sp.? For example, obscurus.



2. Any Athous haemorrhoidalis?

Hello.
1. Tell me what is the difference between Ampedus pomonae and A. pomorum. This beetle was trapped in a larch forest in Khakassia.





2. Tell me what kind of ground beetle. Whether it is such a Harpalus, but very similar to Curtonotus, say brevicollis… BUT this one has only one post-ocular bristle.

Quite a peculiar bug.
Tell me please.
Caught: 29.04.1997 Here: M. O. Sergiev Posad district, okr. der. Golkovo, mixed forest ," v let".
Length: 4.5 mm.

Pictures:

PC032086.jpg — (37.24к)

to Double A

[/quote] 2. And this one is called Malthinus biguttatus. Karelia, July.

Right?
[/quote]

In my opinion, biguttatus is.
And if it's not a secret, where is it more accurate in Karelia? The point is that I am trying to put together all the disparate data on the entomofauna of Karelia + the Kola Peninsula and the Karelian Isthmus of Leningrad Oblast, i.e., that part of Eastern Fennoscandia that belongs to Russia.

This post was edited by IchMan - 03.12.2009 20: 09

Quite a peculiar bug.
Tell me please.

Not Triplax aenea Schall.?

Batch # 5, Moscow and the region

41. 29.08.2009


42. 05.06.2009


and a couple of maggots. at least to the family, if possible...

43. 05.06.2009, on the nettle


44. 07.06.2009

To Double A:
Yes, only he is now Crudosilis ruficollis. A good bug.

The NakaRB:
36-Brachysomus echinatus
41-Cychramus luteus, apparently
42-Oedemera virescens
44-leaf beetle-Lema or Oulema

This post was edited by Fornax13-04.12.2009 02: 42

Not Triplax aenea Schall.?

He, my dear

Party No. 5, Moscow and the region
44. 07.06.2009

44-Leaf beetle - Lema or Oulema

I would like to clarify-larva

to Double A

In my opinion, biguttatus is.
And if it's not a secret, where is it more accurate in Karelia? The point is that I am trying to put together all the disparate data on the entomofauna of Karelia + the Kola Peninsula and the Karelian Isthmus of Leningrad Oblast, i.e., that part of Eastern Fennoscandia that belongs to Russia.

This beetle was photographed on Balaam. As far as I understand, is ETR extremely rare in our center, or does it not exist at all?

Party No. 4, Moscow and the region
36. 17.05.2009

  
36th-yes...?Sciaphilus asperatus

The NakaRB:
36-Brachysomus echinatus

Precisely! Well, of course, Brachysomus echinatus! To avoid misunderstandings, I remove my incorrect definition
Fornax13 - +5

South of Primorye, August.

Pictures:

DSC_0296.jpg — (186.19к)

South of Primorye, August.

It resembles Episcapha (from Erotylidae), but the Far Eastern fauna is a dark forest for me.

I will assume that Episcapha flavofasciata is.

I will assume that Episcapha flavofasciata is.

Only the color of the spots on the elytra confuses me. It's not flavo...

It also confuses me, it should be green. And it becomes flavo after drying.

It also confuses me, it should be green. And it becomes flavo after drying.

Or maybe the color of the spots just in the photo is distorted for some technical reason?

Photos taken at night, with flash. The spots weren't exactly green or yellow, but rather whitish.

Quite a large Blaps from Egypt.
Luxor 11.12.1999. L=40mm.
Please help me figure it out.

This post was edited by vasiliy-feoktistov - 06.12.2009 15: 19

Pictures:

1.jpg — (100.69к)


2.jpg — (92.7 k)

Quite a large Blaps from Egypt.
Luxor 11.12.1999. L=40mm.
Please help me figure it out.

Blaps gigas (Linnaeus, 1767)

Blaps gigas (Linnaeus, 1767)

Thanks! Well, it seems to have gone here (there is also Egypt, Central Asia). Yes, you were right: apparently you should not make a separate topic by their definition

Thanks! Well, it seems to have gone here (there is also Egypt, Central Asia). Yes, you were right: apparently you should not make a separate topic by their definition

I'm not really an expert in black chicks, but I have a well-defined male and female Blaps gigas from Malta (Comino Island) in my collection, so I recognized your boy.

I'm not really an expert in black chicks, but I have a well-defined male and female Blaps gigas from Malta (Comino Island) in my collection, so I recognized your boy .

Yes, I myself do not know them at all except our own, but there is a person who is not an entomologist, but an archaeologist. So he gives them to me from time to time. Well, it has accumulated accordingly, and the beetles are interesting.

Quite a large Blaps from Egypt.
Luxor 11.12.1999. L=40mm.
Please help me figure it out.

I posted the photo here: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtop...721#entry977721

This post was edited by vasiliy-feoktistov - 06.12.2009 15: 18

I'm deleting the photo from here. Posted here: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtop...721#entry977721

Vasily, I think someone here has already told you that deleting a photo after detection is a rather vicious practice. First, not every primary definition based on a photo should be immediately recognized as 100% correct, especially if it is expressed only by one person and not confirmed by a recognized (at least here, on the forum) group specialist (even if he silently visited the topic ). Secondly, by deleting a photo, you deprive users of the topic of the opportunity to quickly see what was discussed (a link to a new placement is not always convenient for this). Third, if you correct an incorrect primary definition, you will have to make adjustments to the caption to the image again, and by this time someone who is not very knowledgeable could have already looked at it in the topic in the "Insect Images" section, and formed an erroneous idea of the habit of the species. In short, you put up a photo in the " definition of beetles (butterflies, orthoptera, etc.)" - leave it here. I think so.

Vasily, I think someone here has already told you that deleting a photo after detection is a rather vicious practice. First, not every primary definition based on a photo should be immediately recognized as 100% correct, especially if it is expressed only by one person and not confirmed by a recognized (at least here, on the forum) group specialist (even if he silently visited the topic ). Secondly, by deleting a photo, you deprive users of the topic of the opportunity to quickly see what was discussed (a link to a new placement is not always convenient for this). Third, if you correct an incorrect primary definition, you will have to make adjustments to the caption to the image again, and by this time someone who is not very knowledgeable could have already looked at it in the topic in the "Insect Images" section, and formed an erroneous idea of the habit of the species. In short, you put up a photo in the " definition of beetles (butterflies, orthoptera, etc.)" - leave it here. I think so.

Victor, I just don't want to overload the topic. However, I won't do this again. P.S. I'll restore it now.

The animal is from the same place as the previous one (Egypt, Luxor) and was caught at the same time (11.12.1999) L=25mm.
Apparently there is a banal beetle (5 copies at once). arrived).
Please help me identify it.

Pictures:

1.jpg — (97.5 k)


2.jpg — (157.59 k)

I'll answer myself: It can't be Trachyderma hispida Forskal, 1775.
http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/grapsyf3.htm http://www.tenebrionidae.net/simplephpgall...al,%201775).jpg What do you think?

This post was edited by vasiliy-feoktistov - 07.12.2009 18: 50

I'll answer myself: It can't be Trachyderma hispida Forskal, 1775.
http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/grapsyf3.htm  http://www.tenebrionidae.net/simplephpgall...al,%201775).jpg What do you think?

I think it can, but I wouldn't say that. I also have some similar black chicks from Egypt, but without the keys, I can't be 100% sure.

I think it can, but I wouldn't say that. I also have some similar black chicks from Egypt, but without the keys, I can't be 100% sure.

Yes, just a serious problem with them. Here I decided to decide on my accumulated money-it's tight.

Help with the ground beetle. Moscow, early July, arrived at the light.
Amara sp.?

Pictures:

carabid1004.jpg — (128.73к)

can't you do it from above?

The only photo, unfortunately. She flew away

Here is another, apparently pterostichus. MO, in the forest, 10-15 mm. Early August. If necessary, I can show you larger parts.

This post was edited by Double A - 09.12.2009 14: 27

Pictures:

car08011xx.jpg — (289.77к)

Pterostichus niger niger is thought to be

Please help me determine what kind of beetles they are http://dump.ru/file/3909136
http://dump.ru/file/3909135 . Found in summer 2008 in Gelendzhik.

Please help me determine what kind of beetles they are http://dump.ru/file/3909136
http://dump.ru/file/3909135 .
Found in the summer of 2008 in Gelendzhik.

Calosoma inquisitor on the first one.
On the second (sorry, but the quality of the images is "below the baseboard") - I don't distinguish - this is banal, but there are similar ones.

This post was edited by evk-09.12.2009 18: 17

nothing can be said about my ground beetle at the beginning of this page..? Maybe you need other angles?

Please help me determine what kind of beetles they are http://dump.ru/file/3909136
http://dump.ru/file/3909135 . Found in the summer of 2008 in Gelendzhik.

In the second picture: Buprestis octoguttata? (maybe the quality would be better).

More ground beetle from rotten trees, early September, MO, <10 mm.
Agonum sp.? Pubescence of the antennae is not visible even at maximum resolution

Pictures:

carabid1303.jpg — (205.23к)