E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Community and ForumInsects identificationIdentification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Pages: 1 ...591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599... 854

28.03.2015 13:10, MIV

Thank you for identifying Thai beetles!
Is it possible to determine up to the type of dung beetle from this photo?
Turkey, prov. Bitliz. Dl. 23mm
picture: __________________.jpgpicture: ________________________.jpg
Ground beetle. At least until Rod?
Same Turkey Dl. 22mm
picture: IMG_8564_________.jpg

28.03.2015 15:57, Fornax13

  
Ground beetle. At least until Rod?
Same Turkey Dl. 22mm
picture: IMG_8564_________.jpg

Really Turkey and really 22mm? Definitely not Oriental? Elytra unpunctured? I would like to say that from Licinini the beast resembles Diplocheila, but in Turkey they are unknown.

This post was edited by Fornax13-28.03.2015 15: 59
Likes: 1

28.03.2015 17:56, Olearius

Pterostichus 12 mm, St. Petersburg neighborhood.

picture: DSCN9529.jpg

picture: DSCN9528.JPG

28.03.2015 18:23, Dorcadion

Help identify the ground beetle. Filmed in Georgia, Telavi. shuffle.gif

user posted image


Carabus adamsi adamsi
Likes: 1

28.03.2015 19:17, Woodmen

Surroundings of Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. May 13.

user posted image

28.03.2015 19:20, Woodmen

Surroundings of Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. May 13.
Cassida panzeri?

user posted image

28.03.2015 19:38, MIV

Really Turkey and really 22mm? Definitely not Oriental? Elytra unpunctured? I would like to say that from Licinini the beast resembles Diplocheila, but in Turkey they are unknown.

The mattress is signed: Turkey, prov. Bitlis, near Bashan. The beetle is really quite large - 22 mm. It was in a single copy. among the above-mentioned geotrups and bronzes (P. funebuis, P. trojans, P. asiatica). There is no punctuation on the elytra. The mandibles are somewhat asymmetrical.

28.03.2015 22:28, Grummen

Pterostichus 12 mm, St. Petersburg neighborhood.

user posted image

user posted image


P. nigrita
Likes: 1

30.03.2015 8:56, Mantispid

Egypt: Sharm-El-Sheikh

It's Adesmia right?

This post was edited by Mantispid-30.03.2015 08: 57

Pictures:
picture: Adesmia.jpg
Adesmia.jpg — (246.87к)

30.03.2015 9:25, Andrey.A.

Likes: 1

30.03.2015 11:10, Mantispid

Adesmia sp.
similar to A. cancellata

thank you, she is Adesmia cancellata (Klug, 1830)

30.03.2015 12:16, Maks03

Please help me identify ground beetles.
(collected in September 2014 in the Moscow region)
picture: Pterostichus.jpg

30.03.2015 14:00, Olearius

Voronezh region, cretaceous mountains.

picture: DSCN9135.jpg

30.03.2015 14:05, vasiliy-feoktistov

Voronezh region, cretaceous mountains.

Calathus (Dolichus) halensis (Schaller, 1783)

This post was edited by vasiliy-feoktistov-30.03.2015 14: 06
Likes: 1

31.03.2015 18:57, Mantispid

Kara puzik?
4 mm
Egypt

Pictures:
picture: Karapuz_verx.jpg
Karapuz_verx.jpg — (295.25к)

picture: Karapuz_niz.jpg
Karapuz_niz.jpg — (324.02к)

31.03.2015 20:35, Barnaba

  
Kara puzik?
4 mm
Egypt


yes.gif Saprininae.

31.03.2015 22:24, Alexandr Zhakov

I was last week in the gypsum caves in the Ternopil region. The total length of the cave passages is more than 50 km. Asked to watch beetles in the cave, found only one. but also, as I understand it, not caveman. Found more than 500 m from the entrance. What a group, in my complete ignorance of beetles. I think it's a small black-skinned thing. Is the view interesting? accidentally wandered or still tends to caves. the quality of the photo is no good, frown.gifin a hurry 4-5 mm. If it's interesting, I'll retake it better. (I'll try to reshoot it.)
picture: 1IMG_3103.jpgpicture: 1IMG_3142.jpgpicture: 1IMG_3147.jpgpicture: 1IMG_3152.jpg[attachm
entid()=219997]

Pictures:
picture: 1IMG_3158.jpg
1IMG_3158.jpg — (64.47к)

31.03.2015 22:31, Fornax13

Catops, female.
Likes: 1

31.03.2015 22:53, smax

Kara puzik?
4 mm
Egypt

Chalcionellus suspectus is just described from Egypt. Take a look? You can't tell from the picture. It seems that the postorbital fossae are there, quite a lot.

31.03.2015 22:58, Mantispid

Chalcionellus suspectus is just described from Egypt. Take a look? You can't tell from the picture. It seems that the postorbital fossae are there, quite a lot.

no, it's Saprinus (Saprinus) chalcites Illiger, (1807)

31.03.2015 23:32, Barnaba

To Mantispid:
By the way, that female Blaps... For a number of reasons (the angle between the sawyers, the length of the sawyere), it is really rather B.gigas, but habitually... I attach a comparison with a female from Malta (this is the exact gigas) from Dmitrich (reduced to the same size) and a photo of the male B. lusitanica. Check it out again photo of the female from Mallorca from the Zinovsky site (M. Nabozhenko's definition).
However, I do not insist on anything, since it is very creative to identify many species of Blaps from related groups based on photos of one female. I don't know a working key for Mediterranean Blaps in a ready-made form, but there are materials that can be compared. There will be time, I'll do some more flogging.
By the way, in the photo of a blap from Egypt from uv. Vasily Feoktistov is not B. gigas (he is not in Egypt), but something from the B. polychresta group (most likely, he is the same).

Pictures:
picture: Blaps_compare_1.jpg
Blaps_compare_1.jpg — (63.04к)

picture: Blaps_lusitanica_Herbst_1799_540073.jpg
Blaps_lusitanica_Herbst_1799_540073.jpg — (128.14 k)

Likes: 2

01.04.2015 0:31, smax

no, it's Saprinus (Saprinus) chalcites Illiger, (1807)

So he doesn't have any anterolacral dimples?

01.04.2015 0:48, vasiliy-feoktistov

By the way, in the photo of a blap from Egypt from uv. Vasily Feoktistov is not B. gigas (he is not in Egypt), but something from the B. polychresta group (most likely, he is the same).

Where does the wind come from that it doesn't exist in Egypt? Can I get a link? It became interesting, although I do not have a special craving for them smile.gif)

01.04.2015 1:06, Barnaba

Where does the wind come from that it doesn't exist in Egypt? Can I get a link? It became interesting although I don't have a special craving for them smile.gif)


1. CONDAMINE, F. L., SOLDATI, L., RASPLUS, J.-Y. and KERGOAT, G. J. (2011), New insights on systematics and phylogenetics of Mediterranean Blaps species (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae: Blaptini), assessed through morphology and dense taxon sampling. Systematic Entomology, 36: 340–361. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2010.00567.x
here

2. Fabien L. Condamine, Laurent Soldati, Anne-Laure Clamens, Jean-Yves Rasplus, Gael J. Kergoat, Diversification patterns and processes of wingless endemic insects in the Mediterranean Basin: historical biogeography of the genus Blaps (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), Journal of Biogeography, 2013, 40, 10
here

In the second, later article, the data is presented more recently and more conveniently.

This post was edited by Barnaba - 01.04.2015 01: 10
Likes: 3

01.04.2015 8:35, Mantispid

So he doesn't have any anterolacral dimples?

I have no idea smile.gif
this was determined by one of the main experts on toddlers - Giovanni Ratto

01.04.2015 8:37, Mantispid

To Mantispid:
By the way, that female Blaps... For a number of reasons (the angle between the sawyers, the length of the sawyere), it is really rather B.gigas, but habitually... I attach a comparison with a female from Malta (this is the exact gigas) from Dmitrich (reduced to the same size) and a photo of the male B. lusitanica. Check it out again photo of the female from Mallorca from the Zinovsky site (M. Nabozhenko's definition).
However, I do not insist on anything, since it is very creative to identify many species of Blaps from related groups based on photos of one female. I don't know a working key for Mediterranean Blaps in a ready-made form, but there are materials that can be compared. There will be time, I'll do some more flogging.
By the way, in the photo of a blap from Egypt from uv. Vasily Feoktistov is not B. gigas (he is not in Egypt), but something from the B. polychresta group (most likely, he is the same).

Zino's photo shows the same copy as mine lol.gif lol.gif lol.gif
and this is still B. gigas

01.04.2015 13:18, smax

I have no idea smile.gif
this is how one of the main experts on toddlers, Giovanni Ratto, defined it

Dyk, you can see if it's a glare, or the pits on the chitin smile.gifA complete feeling that these sinful pits are there and it could not be saprinus, despite the wide loop of the anterior thoracic grooves. A nice bug. The funny thing is, I have one, I didn't recognize it. Bastards lol.gif

01.04.2015 13:47, Olearius

In the park of St. Petersburg, yesterday 7.5 mm (both copies)

picture: 7____1.jpg

picture: 7_5___.jpg

This post was edited by Olearius - 01.04.2015 13: 48

01.04.2015 13:55, Victor Titov

In the park of St. Petersburg, yesterday 7.5 mm (both copies)

1 - Badister ?bullatus
2- Stomis pumicatus
Likes: 1

02.04.2015 13:50, Olearius

In the park of St. Petersburg, the day before yesterday.

7 mm
picture: 7___.jpg

8 mm
picture: 8___.jpg

9mm
picture: 9___.jpg

02.04.2015 20:16, Mantispid

Uzkotelka. Synchita??? Nothing comes to mind. Keys don't help.

Balearic Islands, Majorca

upd: hang up, this is Endeitoma granulata (Say, 1826)

This post was edited by Mantispid-02.04.2015 22: 35

Pictures:
picture: Synchita.jpg
Synchita.jpg — (291.15к)

06.04.2015 7:36, convexus

Maybe there are experts on amaras? Komsomolsk-on-Amur neighborhood, wasteland

Pictures:
picture: Amara_sp._20_31.8.2014_________________Gabitus.jpg
Amara_sp._20_31.8.2014_________________Gabitus.jpg — (291.55к)

picture: Amara_sp._20_31.8.2014_________________edeagus.jpg
Amara_sp._20_31.8.2014_________________edeagus.jpg — (304.66к)

06.04.2015 10:22, convexus

And another amarka, from near Komsomolsk-on-Amur. Very similar to brunnea, but the right paramere is different, and the lamella is different

Pictures:
picture: Amara_sp._1.6.2014____________.____Gabitus.jpg
Amara_sp._1.6.2014____________.____Gabitus.jpg — (292.2к)

picture: Amara_sp._1.6.2014____________.____edeagus.jpg
Amara_sp._1.6.2014____________.____edeagus.jpg — (257.44к)

06.04.2015 10:32, Fornax13

And the big one (in the sense of the first one)?

This post was edited by Fornax13-06.04.2015 10: 33

06.04.2015 12:07, convexus

And the big one (in the sense of the first one)?

If this is a question about amar, then the first = 6.5 mm
the second-5.5 mm

06.04.2015 12:43, Fornax13

If this is a question about amar, then the first = 6.5 mm
the second - 5.5 mm

Can't the first one be Amara (Bradycelia) minuta?

06.04.2015 14:03, convexus

Can't the first one be Amara (Bradycelia) minuta?

if only by a VERY long stretch:
1) the shape of the right paramera does not match
2) a penis with slightly pinched (not parallel) sides. Although the top of the lamella is very similar
3) the groove on the right side of the penis is not so pronounced and is located somewhat differently
4 ) проходит passes through the upper limit of size. And there is also ♀ and it is somewhat larger

I look at the attributes by their determinant

06.04.2015 14:44, Olearius

Saint Petersburg, today. Size 10 mm.

picture: dscn9569.jpg

Front foot

picture: DSCN9570.JPG

This post was edited by Olearius - 06.04.2015 14: 55

06.04.2015 16:49, цверг

Good afternoon!
Tell me, please, what kind of Beetle?
07.08.2013, Krasnoyarsk, mixed forest.
user posted image

user posted image

06.04.2015 20:31, Fornax13

if only by a VERY long stretch:
1) the shape of the right paramera does not match
2) a penis with slightly pinched (not parallel) sides. Although the top of the lamella is very similar
3) the groove on the right side of the penis is not so pronounced and is located somewhat differently
4 ) проходит passes through the upper limit of size. And there is also ♀ and it is somewhat larger
I look at the signs by DV determinant

Sorry, she's kind of in Reductocelia right now.
Yes, the genitals are different. Although if you compare the drawing of aedeagus A. nigromontana from the DV determinant and this genital: http://carabidae.org/taxa/lucens-baliani-1943 then they are even more different, in my opinion.
And if they really have such a brutal variability, then why not?
As for the size, maybe it's not so important-plus or minus 0.2 mm in both directions. Is there any comparative material on minuta?

This post was edited by Fornax13-06.04.2015 20: 33

Pages: 1 ...591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599... 854

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.