Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Now it means coming in...

Surroundings of Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. May 24th.
I know it's bronze, but I'd like to know the view.

Not all of them, just this one and the previous one...I'm 100% sure it's him...Or are there other versions?I'll bet you that!

Surroundings of Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. May 24th.
I know it's bronze, but I'd like to know the view.

Can you help me with the bug?" Someone from the Cryptophagidae?
MO, June, 4 mm

You have all Stephanocleonus at once microgrammus what? How can it be there if it does not go further than the Urals to the east?

Please tell me about weevils, Penza region

Well, yes, it's really Stefan, you're right. And I now saw the real Coniocleonus schoenherri - from the ocd. Mondy, horse 16 mm.
Oh, by the way, and where is this "microgrammus" side stripes on the prsp.? I shouldn't have argued

Guys! If I'm not mistaken, you're arguing about my weevils?
Could you summarize from the post URL #25893 on the previous page?
Thank you for earlier!

Guys! If I'm not mistaken, you're arguing about my weevils?
Could you summarize from the post URL #25893 on the previous page?
Thank you for earlier!

And before the appearance of this zlatka can not be determined ? Moscow region, June 14.

here the forage plant could give more information than the beetle itself... )

The healthiest one is Coniocleonus schoenherri, as I said before. The rest are Stephans (you have at least three types of them). And so - there are a hundred and fifty species (the largest genus of the tribe cleonini), and of these, probably two-thirds live in Siberia ) Using photos to identify them is a completely stupid task, except that the most charismatic can be identified. Here you need to look for yourself, for the fauna of Ter-Minasyan at least... Although they have also been added since then.

no, according to Ter-Minasyan, they are also shitty to determine, at least "on dry", without reference material, most of the signs are not clear. Sometimes one thing is written at all, another is presented, but in fact-the third.

Clear. There is a complete lack of information about the plant.

This is yes, there is an overwhelming majority of species in this book to determine shitty - but what should I do? There are no other keys for them.

Good evening .
A weevil ? Germany 2,5 mm 12.06.13

To catch up ...
Germany 3mm 11.06.14

Exomias pellucidus (Boheman, 1843)

Why not Barypeithes ?

Surroundings of Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. May 24th.

The healthiest one is Coniocleonus schoenherri, as I said before. The rest are Stephans (you have at least three types of them). And so - there are a hundred and fifty species (the largest genus of the tribe cleonini), and of these, probably two-thirds live in Siberia ) Using photos to identify them is a completely stupid task, except that the most charismatic can be identified. Here you need to look for yourself, for the fauna of Ter-Minasyan at least... Although they have also been added since then.

well, why, the rest of the cleonines are determined and the key is not bad by birth...
the main problem is aspropartenis and stephanocleonus

 
And what is this" beast " - Stephanocleonus microgrammus? Rare or something?
I thought I'd had them before. But it doesn't. There is only one of them - the others are somewhat different.

Uh-huh, did I tell you how we defined leucophaeus before the genus?

Hello, I ask for help in determining the bonuses.
Collected in October 2015 in the Ramenskoye district of the Moscow region.
He himself defined it as Carabus (Carabus) menetriesi (Hummel, 1827),
but he is not sure of his own definition.

Hello, I ask for help in determining the bonuses.
Collected in October 2015 in the Ramenskoye district of the Moscow region.
He himself defined it as Carabus (Carabus) menetriesi (Hummel, 1827),
but he is not sure of his own definition.

Help identify ground beetles.
Collected in August 2015 in the Ramenskoye district of the Moscow region