E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Community and ForumInsects identificationIdentification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Pages: 1 ...652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660... 854

12.02.2016 19:00, Jaguar paw

Ilya, thank you! beer.gif

Woodmen, Pseudocistela ceramboides.

This post was edited by Jaguar paw-12.02.2016 19: 01
Likes: 1

12.02.2016 19:43, Liparus

Ilya, thank you! beer.gif

Woodmen, Pseudocistela ceramboides.

in my opinion samka
Likes: 1

12.02.2016 19:50, AGG

Likes: 1

13.02.2016 20:58, Александр57

I apologize for the hackneyed topic. Is it possible to identify Arhopalus, rusticus - ferus, from such photos?
Dzerzhinsk Nizhny Novgorod region
1-23 mm, August 2-25
mm, July

Pictures:
picture: 1.jpg
1.jpg — (58.18к)

picture: 1a.jpg
1a.jpg — (46.32к)

picture: 2.jpg
2.jpg — (73.21 k)

13.02.2016 23:50, gstalker

What's the right thing to do today ? Oulema obscura (Stephens, 1831) or Oulema gallaeciana (Heyden, 1870) confused.gif

Pictures:
picture: 4mm_23.06.13_Northeim.jpg
4mm_23.06.13_Northeim.jpg — (319.95к)

14.02.2016 12:20, lazardin

Good day to all, and me with an overseas animal help
Africa Congo
picture: DSC06755.JPG
picture: DSC06751.JPG
picture: DSC06752.JPG
thank you in advance

14.02.2016 16:05, никитатимошев

Probably some kind of dung beetle confused.gif

14.02.2016 16:45, smb

Good day to all, and me with an overseas animal help
Africa Congo
picture: DSC06755.JPG
picture: DSC06751.JPG
picture: DSC06752.JPG
thank you in advance

In my opinion, this is someone from the genus Diplognatha (Gory & Percheron, 1833).
I will assume that Diplognatha gagates (Forster, 1771)

This post was edited by smb-02/14/2016 16: 49
Likes: 1

14.02.2016 22:28, Guest

Likes: 1

15.02.2016 4:03, akulich-sibiria

This is rather a Polygraphus polygraphus, which Evgeny forgot about.
Females also have bristles of hair on their foreheads and are longer than those of Polygraphus subopacus. And the club of the antennae is pointed, while in Polygraphus subopacus it is rounded.


Still, I don't agree. I am inclined to believe that this is just P. proximus, yet females of P. polygraphus do not have such a pronounced and thick brush of hairs on the forehead, as mentioned in Chilakhsayeva's works. Review of species of the genus Polygraphus in the fauna of the Moscow region, 2010. Catherine also has a strong suspicion that this is exactly the Ussuri, especially as I understood, at one time a hearth of just this type was discovered nearby.
By the shape of the mace I agree, this once again shows that subopacus can be ruled out.
Likes: 1

15.02.2016 4:07, akulich-sibiria

By the way about the shape of the mace, I among the Ussuri polygraphs with the characteristic shape of the mace of the antennae came across these....
1. Characteristic shape
picture: P9170198_1.jpg
2. With rounded top
picture: P9170199_.jpg
Likes: 1

15.02.2016 19:49, Dmitry Vlasov

Still, I don't agree. I am inclined to believe that this is just P. proximus, yet females of P. polygraphus do not have such a pronounced and thick brush of hairs on the forehead, as mentioned in Chilakhsayeva's works. Review of species of the genus Polygraphus in the fauna of the Moscow region, 2010. Catherine also has a strong suspicion that this is exactly the Ussuri, especially as I understood, at one time a hearth of just this type was discovered nearby.
By the shape of the mace I agree, this once again shows that subopacus can be ruled out.

I will not argue... yes.gifespecially since the subject of the dispute is missing and P. proximus, which I do not know. shuffle.gif Our discussion once again proves that it is impossible to reliably determine such a trifle from a photo!!! wall.gif

This post was edited by Elizar - 02/15/2016 19: 52
Likes: 1

16.02.2016 3:47, akulich-sibiria

I will not argue... yes.gifespecially since the subject of the dispute is missing and P. proximus, which I do not know. shuffle.gif Our discussion once again proves that it is impossible to reliably determine such a trifle from a photo!!! wall.gif



Dmitry, I agree! I tried to do this using the exception method. It's a pity the beetle is not caught.

16.02.2016 10:43, Arachna

Hello! Is it correct to:
Acanthocinus griseus (Fabricius 1792)
12.02.2016 Khotyn Chernivtsi region, indoor 9 mm
picture: IMG_3821.jpg picture: IMG_3820.jpg

This post was edited by Arachna - 02/16/2016 10: 47

16.02.2016 10:54, Liparus

Hello! Is it correct to:
Acanthocinus griseus (Fabricius 1792)
12.02.2016 Khotyn Chernivtsi region, indoor 9 mm
picture: IMG_3821.jpg picture: IMG_3820.jpg

This is not Acanthocinus griseus

16.02.2016 11:03, Liparus

this is some Leiopus
Likes: 1

16.02.2016 12:07, Arachna

this is some kind of Leiopus

Leiopus nebulosus?

16.02.2016 12:44, AGG

judging by the prsp Leiopus linnei http://www.zin.ru/animalia/coleoptera/rus/leiop2sp.htm
Likes: 1

16.02.2016 23:27, Anton Kozyrev

Saratov region, June 2015.
1. picture: IMG_9220_copy.jpg
2. picture: IMG_9244_copy.jpg

17.02.2016 0:21, Victor Titov

Saratov region, June 2015.

1 - Agrypnus murinus.
2 - Selatosomus cruciatus.
Likes: 1

18.02.2016 11:58, Михаил80

Help me determine it.
Kharkiv region.
Is it from the Cydnidae?

picture: yhzd_P7iQck.jpg

picture: SayG1trqOUM.jpg

18.02.2016 14:15, Dmitry Vlasov

Help me determine it.
Kharkiv region.
Is it from the Cydnidae?

picture: yhzd_P7iQck.jpg

picture: SayG1trqOUM.jpg

This is the bean seed Acanthoscelides obtectus family Bruchidae

18.02.2016 14:36, Михаил80

This is a bean seed Acanthoscelides obtectus family Bruchidae


It was on the beans that they were. Thanks!

This post was edited by Mikhail80-02/18/2016 14: 42

18.02.2016 23:29, Михалис

It was on the beans that they were. Thanks!

P.S. And most importantly-it's a bug, not a bug, as you decided.

20.02.2016 13:03, Mantispid

I want to finish off the Kislovodsk beetles. With elephants, leaf eaters, barbels and others, I managed on my own, but with the beetle I have big problems and need help.

1. Amara ?ovata - 9.3 mm, Kislovodsk, park, July.
2. ?Zabrus ?tenebrioides, if so, which subspecies? - 15.5 mm, ibid
. 3. Bembidion by Isaev I go confidently to (?Peryphus) ?tetracolum Say, 1823, but then Wed. Volga region, and this is the Caucasus... 5.2 mm, Narzan Valley, together with the B. cyaneum series

Pictures:
picture: Amara_Kislo.jpg
Amara_Kislo.jpg — (269.32к)

picture: Zabrus_Kislo.jpg
Zabrus_Kislo.jpg — (320.5к)

picture: Bembidion_Kislo.jpg
Bembidion_Kislo.jpg — (313.06к)

Likes: 1

20.02.2016 15:31, I.solod

I want to finish off the Kislovodsk beetles. With elephants, leaf eaters, barbels and others, I managed on my own, but with the beetle I have big problems and need help.

1. Amara ?ovata - 9.3 mm, Kislovodsk, park, July.
2. ?Zabrus ?tenebrioides, if so, which subspecies? - 15.5 mm, ibid
. 3. Bembidion by Isaev I go confidently to (?Peryphus) ?tetracolum Say, 1823, but then Wed. Volga region, and this is the Caucasus... 5.2 mm, Narzan Valley, together with the B. cyaneum series



3. so bembidionov define full shamansivo-but I will assume that it is but not sure 50 % even Bembidion (Peryphus) cruciatum quadriflameum Rtt., 1889

1. A. ovata f.adamantina Kolenati 1845

2. Zabrus (s.str.) tenebrioides longulus Reiche probably it.
Likes: 1

20.02.2016 16:12, Mantispid

3. so bembidionov define full shamansivo-but I will assume that it is but not sure 50 % even Bembidion (Peryphus) cruciatum quadriflameum Rtt., 1889

1. A. ovata f.adamantina Kolenati 1845

2. Zabrus (s.str.) tenebrioides longulus Reiche probably it.

they also tell me B. subcostatum, a common species in the Caucasus and just close to tetracolum, but my gaps are not so convex ... I think something close, pulled edeagus, but I don't know what to watch there yet)

20.02.2016 21:27, John-ST

What's the right thing to do today ? Oulema obscura (Stephens, 1831) or Oulema gallaeciana (Heyden, 1870) confused.gif

Oulema gallaeciana (Heyden, 1870) (=obscura (Stephens, 1831))

21.02.2016 1:38, I.solod

B. subcostatum is slightly different

22.02.2016 10:11, Mantispid

Another batch of incomprehensible Kislovodsk

Pterostichus? - 12.8 mm
Saprin? - 2.6 mm
Water lover - 3.7 mm

Pictures:
picture: Ptero_Kislo.jpg
Ptero_Kislo.jpg — (315.3к)

picture: Saprinus_Kislo.jpg
Saprinus_Kislo.jpg — (309.01к)

picture: Voda_Kislo.jpg
Voda_Kislo.jpg — (317.72к)

22.02.2016 17:45, lazardin

Good day to all and with the upcoming holiday on February 23
, I will post more exotics, now from friendly China
, thank you in advance and forgiveness for the quality of images
1. 19 mm
picture: 01.JPG
2. 22 mm
picture: DSC06758.JPG
picture: DSC06763.JPG
picture: DSC06766.JPG
3. 25 mm
picture: DSC06768.JPG
picture: DSC06775.JPG
picture: DSC06776.JPG
4. 26 mm
picture: DSC06783.JPG
picture: DSC06791.JPG
picture: DSC06792.JPG
5. 23 mm
picture: DSC06804.JPG
picture: DSC06807.JPG
picture: DSC06807a.JPG

If you need something, then I'll try to reshoot it, you can also poke something to read on Chinese bronzes

This post was edited by lazardin - 22.02.2016 17: 47

22.02.2016 18:44, Liparus

Good day to all and with the upcoming holiday on February 23
, I will post more exotics, now from friendly China
, thank you in advance and forgiveness for the quality of the pictures

3. 25 mm
picture: DSC06768.JPG

5. 23 mm
picture: DSC06804.JPG

No. 3 and 5-Protaetia minshanensis

This post was edited by Liparus - 22.02.2016 18: 46
Likes: 1

23.02.2016 4:10, Dergg

Good day to all and with the upcoming holiday on February 23
, I will post more exotics, now from friendly China



lazardin, what's the more precise location of the capture - Daba Shan, Hubei Province, by any chance? I have a similar set of beetles from there, maybe even from the same collections))

#1 almost certainly Mimela splendens

#2-I have similar beetles identified as Protaetia orientalis. Determined by the "Fauna of the USSR", a volume dedicated to bronzes. However, it does not fully cover the territory of China, and it is already too old-there are, of course, no species like minshanensis there.

23.02.2016 9:02, lazardin

23.02.2016 15:14, Чегар

Good evening, everyone. I ask for these disgusting photos (I shoot on my mobile phone) to help determine at least up to the genus.
The first two are 10 and 13 mm., the second two are 12 and 13 mm.
Kazakhstan, South Kazakhstan region, Syrdarya-Turkestan GRPP, Syrdarya floodplain, 24.05.2014

File/s:



download file _____.bmp

size: 642.83 k
number of downloads: 416






25.02.2016 12:29, Urman

Please help me identify a slime mold from Yakutia.

Pictures:
picture: DSC03079.JPG
DSC03079.JPG — (286.72к)

26.02.2016 15:35, usya04

good day! Can I use this photo to identify a darkling?
Armenia, Gorovanj desert, 15.05.2015
picture: P5165288.JPG

26.02.2016 16:03, Gray-Ejik

Good time to all! Can you tell me who can?
Primorsky Krai.
1) Niponius_impressicollis?
picture: Niponius_impressicollis.jpg
2) Platypus_sp._guercivorus?
picture: Platypus_sp..jpg

This post was edited by Gray-Ejik - 02/26/2016 16: 58

26.02.2016 16:55, Fornax13

2 Urman: Chlaenius stschukini, isn't it?

2 usya04: Pachyscelis musiva, must be

2 Gray-Ejik: yes, apparently Niponius impressicollis and Platypus?quercivorus

This post was edited by Fornax13-26.02.2016 17: 05
Likes: 2

26.02.2016 19:16, Natali22206

Pliz, beetles of the Ryazan region

1. user posted image

2. user posted image
user posted image

3. user posted image

Pages: 1 ...652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660... 854

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.