E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Identification of Lepidoptera (Butterflies and Moths)

Community and ForumInsects identificationIdentification of Lepidoptera (Butterflies and Moths)

Pages: 1 ...792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800... 986

30.05.2017 17:00, Alexandr Zhakov

These representatives, alas, were not identified even before the genus. I would be extremely grateful for your help!

Only the first impression, without precise definition, supplement, correct. smile.gif
52. Anarta stigmosa, we look at the forehead,
58. It looks like Hadena, but I can't remember such people.
59. Hadena capsincola
88. Caradrina clavipalpis or something more exotic.
89. Clytie gracilis
109. Cardepia possibly hartigi, we look at the forehead, there should be an outgrowth.
114. ??
115. Pericyma albidentaria
116. Spodoptera exigua
118. Dichagyris from the "group" signifera
Likes: 2

30.05.2017 19:11, Konung

In Europe, these would be:
1. Orthosia gracilis
2. Orthosia incerta
smile.gif

and there they are ge
Likes: 2

30.05.2017 19:13, Konung

These representatives, alas, were not identified even before the genus. I would be extremely grateful for your help!

where are all their bellies? have the butterflies been prepared? on the genitals, they are all well defined!

30.05.2017 20:36, Alexandr Zhakov

where are all their bellies? have the butterflies been prepared? on the genitals, they are all well defined!

smile.gif Svyatoslav, this is part of the fees that entomologists who come there to work have left in nature reserves. I don't think we need to tell you how the material is stored in nature reserves. the bellies are no longer there, but there are still wings, which the employee is trying to use to make up the fauna of the reserve. I see such a picture. smile.gif

30.05.2017 20:59, Alexandr Zhakov

These representatives, alas, were not identified even before the genus. I would be extremely grateful for your help!

58. They suggest that this is Hadena confusa, but in my opinion it is very interesting in color.
88. Caradrina albina
114=118

This post was edited by Djon-30.05.2017 21: 04
Likes: 1

30.05.2017 21:04, MIV

and there they are

Thank you Slava! I wish I could decide on Diarsia.

30.05.2017 22:07, Sergey Rybalkin

Please help me determine the scoop.

538-Orthosia gracilis?
539-Lacanobia sp.?
540-Anarta dianthii ?
541-Acronicta rumicis?
542-?
543-Actebia praecox?
544-Apamea monoglypha?

Pictures:
picture: 539.JPG
539.JPG — (463.62к)

picture: 538.JPG
538.JPG — (427.71к)

picture: 540.JPG
540.JPG — (480.07к)

picture: 541.JPG
541.JPG — (417.67к)

picture: 542.JPG
542.JPG — (408.41 k)

picture: 543.JPG
543.JPG — (456.98к)

picture: 544.JPG
544.JPG — (388.45к)

31.05.2017 0:04, JuVolk

  smile.gif Svyatoslav, this is part of the fees that entomologists who come there to work have left in nature reserves. I don't think we need to tell you how the material is stored in nature reserves. the bellies are no longer there, but there are still wings, which the employee is trying to use to make up the fauna of the reserve. I see such a picture. smile.gif

There are no bellies, because each of the presented butterflies is boiledsmile.gif, and I just help a biology student who makes a list of the fauna of the sovok BBZ to determine the material collected by my supervisor and his colleagues)))

Thank you very much for your cooperation! If you have the opportunity, interest and time, I could send you a photo of Shargacucullia genitals to clarify the definitions

31.05.2017 6:56, Alexandr Zhakov

 
Thank you very much for your cooperation! If you have the opportunity, interest and time, I could send you a photo of Shargacucullia genitalia to clarify the definitions.

I can try, but I'll be away for a week.
smile.gif

31.05.2017 9:30, svm2

Please help me determine the scoop.

538-Orthosia gracilis?
539-Lacanobia sp.?
540-Anarta dianthii ?
541-Acronicta rumicis?
542-?
543-Actebia praecox?
544-Apamea monoglypha?


My clarifications
539-L. suasa
542-micro, need a special
543-A. praecurrens
Likes: 1

31.05.2017 9:32, svm2

Thank you Slava! I wish I could decide on Diarsia.

Well, if from two and with a view from here, then I would say-mendica
Likes: 1

31.05.2017 11:28, Vlad Proklov


542-micro, need a specialist

It looks like Isauria dilucidella.
Likes: 1

31.05.2017 12:20, tomegatherion

What kind of butterfly beetle was this, hovering like a hummingbird in one place and drinking nectar? Taken today in eastern Uzbekistan.

user posted image

31.05.2017 12:24, Vlad Proklov

What kind of butterfly beetle was this, hovering like a hummingbird in one place and drinking nectar? Taken today in eastern Uzbekistan.

Macroglossum stellatarum
Likes: 1

31.05.2017 15:23, Ольга Титова

Please help me with the definition. Today, Sakhalin.
Stauropus fagi (Linnaeus, 1758) ?
Mythimna (Pseudaletia) separata (Walker, 1865)

This post was edited by Olga Titova - 31.05.2017 16: 07

Pictures:
picture: DSC_0413____.jpg
DSC_0413____.jpg — (228.27к)

picture: DSC_0415____.jpg
DSC_0415____.jpg — (241.39к)

31.05.2017 16:25, Pavel Morozov

Yes, Stauropus fagi
Likes: 1

31.05.2017 17:09, Konung

Well, if from two and with a view from here, then I would say-mendica

yes, mendica
Likes: 1

31.05.2017 17:09, Konung

It looks like Isauria dilucidella.

yes, dilucidella

01.06.2017 7:11, Konung

Please help me with the definition. Today, Sakhalin.
Stauropus fagi (Linnaeus, 1758) ?
Mythimna (Pseudaletia) separata (Walker, 1865)

yes, separata
Likes: 1

01.06.2017 21:10, Andrey Ponomarev

M. O., Poplar 27.05.2017
Ancylis uncella?
picture: IMG_7292.jpg
picture: IMG_7294.jpg

01.06.2017 22:28, Vlad Proklov

M. O., Poplar 27.05.2017
Ancylis uncella?

Yes, it's broken.
Likes: 1

02.06.2017 8:02, Radik

Dear experts, Don't miss URL #31808 . I also need help with the definition.

02.06.2017 10:24, Andrey Bezborodkin

Dear experts, Don't miss URL #31808 . I also need help with the definition.

photo 12-Ascotis selenaria
photo 13 - Hypena proboscidalis
photo 14 - Gluphisia crenata

02.06.2017 13:40, Radik

photo 12-Ascotis selenaria
photo 13 - Hypena proboscidalis
photo 14 - Gluphisia crenata

Thank you very much!

02.06.2017 15:13, NZS

I would be grateful for your help in identifying pigeons. All 30.05.2017, Chernivtsi region, Ukraine.
No. 1 (photo 1822, 1824);
No. 2 (photo 1843, 1844);
No. 3 (photo 1875, 1877).

Pictures:
picture: IMG_1822.JPG
IMG_1822.JPG — (313.79к)

picture: IMG_1824.JPG
IMG_1824.JPG — (285.82к)

picture: IMG_1843.JPG
IMG_1843.JPG — (296.18к)

picture: IMG_1844.JPG
IMG_1844.JPG — (301.05к)

picture: IMG_1875.JPG
IMG_1875.JPG — (291.98к)

picture: IMG_1877.JPG
IMG_1877.JPG — (318.46к)

02.06.2017 15:17, Геннадий Шембергер

1-2 Lysandra bellargus. 3-4 Plebeus argirognomon. 5-6 Everes decoloratus.
Likes: 2

02.06.2017 17:48, bogdan88

These variegated birds are not identified from the photo? Double theme http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtop...38#entry1669038

02.06.2017 22:48, Evgenich

Help me identify it. It seems that the photo was taken in the Krasnodar Territory.

Pictures:
picture: 7nKaaUs2.jpg
7nKaaUs2.jpg — (340.91к)

02.06.2017 23:51, Ilia Ustiantcev

A little similar to Euplocamus ophisus, but even is doubtful. In addition, it is not registered in the Krasnodar Territory. The butterfly is almost certainly from this genus, and if so, it is a new species to Russia, even if not ophisa... Exactly from the Krasnodar Territory?
Likes: 2

03.06.2017 0:08, Андреас

Here, species of this genus, if anything: cool.gif
Euplocamus anthracinalis,
Euplocamus bienerti,
Euplocamus charadropis,
Euplocamus delagrangei,
Euplocamus demodes,
Euplocamus melanchrodes,
Euplocamus ophisa,
Euplocamus ophisus,
Euplocamus pallidellus,
Euplocamus schaeferi,
Euplocamus tanylopha,
Euplocamus triplatynta
Likes: 1

03.06.2017 0:14, okoem

These variegated birds are not identified from the photo? Double theme http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtop...38#entry1669038

Caterpillar-J. chloros, imago-I agree with J. graeca-the most common species in the Crimea.
Likes: 1

03.06.2017 9:07, Alexandr Zhakov

A little similar to Euplocamus ophisus, but even is doubtful. In addition, it is not registered in the Krasnodar Territory. The butterfly is almost certainly from this genus, and if so, it is a new species to Russia, even if not ophisa... Exactly from the Krasnodar Territory?

I would think that this is a joke, the photo was taken from the network (file name), there is no link from where it came from, there is no author of the photo, it is even inappropriate to assume a new species, but there was such a species Euplocamus monetellus Lederer, 1864, which was reduced to synonyms for Euplocamus anthracinalis.
picture: gthbcnjecfz_vjkm.jpg
(opred_nasek_evr_chasti_sssr4_2_lepidopter_1981)
maybe it is, if the photo is really from the Krasnodar Territory.

This post was edited by Djon-03.06.2017 09: 25
Likes: 3

03.06.2017 10:07, IgorKO

Dear forumchane, help determine the scoop. 20 km west of Zhytomyr, May 31 at lights
3 and 4-Acronicta sp.?

Pictures:
picture: 2__1_.jpg
2__1_.jpg — (298.74 k)

picture: 2__2_.jpg
2__2_.jpg — (420.09к)

picture: 3.jpg
3.jpg — (286.8к)

picture: 4.jpg
4.jpg — (340.9к)

03.06.2017 10:26, Alexandr Zhakov

Dear forumchane, help determine the scoop. 20 km west of Zhytomyr, May 31 at lights
3 and 4-Acronicta sp.?

Strange some photos, but what is visible or I think that it is visible smile.gif
1. Lacanobia w-latinum
2-4. Acronicta rumicis

03.06.2017 11:24, IgorKO

Strange some photos, but what is visible or I think that it is visible smile.gif
1. Lacanobia w-latinum
2-4. Acronicta rumicis

I apologize for the quality of the photo, as they say in hot pursuit. Thank you so much for your help.

03.06.2017 11:58, Vlad Proklov

A little similar to Euplocamus ophisus, but even is doubtful. In addition, it is not registered in the Krasnodar Territory. The butterfly is almost certainly from this genus, and if so, it is a new species to Russia, even if not ophisa... Exactly from the Krasnodar Territory?

Yes, ophisus, of course - only photographed, perhaps, in some thread of Montenegro.
This is the same Balkan view.
Likes: 1

03.06.2017 15:30, Sergey Rybalkin

Please help me with the definition.

03.06.2017 15:45, Evgenich

I would think that this is a joke, the photo was taken from the network (file name), there is no link from where it came from, there is no author of the photo, it is even inappropriate to assume a new species, but there was such a species Euplocamus monetellus Lederer, 1864, which was reduced to synonyms for Euplocamus anthracinalis.
picture: gthbcnjecfz_vjkm.jpg
(opred_nasek_evr_chasti_sssr4_2_lepidopter_1981)
maybe it is, if the photo is really from the Krasnodar Territory.


Djon, Andreas, Ilya U, kotbegemot
No, it's not a joke. Today I contacted Vladimir Nikolayevich Botyakov, the author of the moth image. The photo was taken by him on May 27, 2017. Flat part of the Krasnodar Territory. The picture is posted on the website "Mushrooms of the Kaluga region".

Thank you for your answers. smile.gif

This post was edited by Evgenich - 03.06.2017 15: 53

03.06.2017 15:53, Sergey Rybalkin

Please help me with the definition.

Pictures:
picture: 534.jpg
534.jpg — (384.39к)

picture: 535.jpg
535.jpg — (417.02к)

picture: 536.jpg
536.jpg — (398.14к)

picture: 537.jpg
537.jpg — (339.83к)

03.06.2017 16:35, svm2

1-Egira conspicillaris / anatolica (differ genitally( but what I have, I put on the first one)
2-micra from the previous post
3-Lacanobia suasa
4 - this is an interesting animal, in my opinion Nycteola kuldzhana, in the previous one nothing was visible in the photo, maybe it was also her.

This post was edited by svm2 - 03.06.2017 16: 35
Likes: 1

Pages: 1 ...792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800... 986

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.