Identification of Lepidoptera (Butterflies and Moths)

Colias sp.

And what do you need to finish to determine the type?

So far, instead of a link to the photo, a link to the main page of the photo hosting service, I'll write a joke about Standfussiana lucernea, suddenly it will work

Hello and good mood to all!
Identified this scoop as Caradrina aspersa. But the obscuring pattern of its front wings is a dark background, which makes one doubt the definition. Is it really her?

https://new.fastpic.org/

Tell me butterflies all October Stavropol

Did you get anything wrong about the location of the capture?" It looks like a palaeno.

Spread it out or expand it in some way. The underside of the yolks is almost the same.

So far, instead of a link to the photo, a link to the main page of the photo hosting service, I'll write a joke about Standfussiana lucernea, suddenly it will work

Please tell me the size of this scoop...

Tell me butterflies all October Stavropol

Here are a couple of them

Very similar to the dark Cleoceris scoriacea

Very similar to the dark Cleoceris scoriacea

Stavropol 29.09.2021 L-30mm to light Atethmia centrago (Haworth, [1809])?

 
Michael, congratulations! I agree with Ilya U, this is a pair of Autophila asiatica males (Staudinger, 1888).
Add to your list another new view for the region) Sorry that shabby, but still cool.

Scoops? Collected on January 20, 2016 on the walls of Krasnaya Cave in Tuva (Kaa-Khem kozhuun).

Something from the pair Autophila unconspicua (Butl.), Autophila chamaephanes Brsn. look at the rear fenders.

Yes, I probably shouldn't have said so categorically with Asiaticism. Very possibly Autophila chamaephanes. I can't agree with inconspicua. In the individuals available to me, the color scheme is slightly different (less yellow) and the proportions of the front and rear wings. They're bigger, too. By the way, Mikhail, can you tell me the wingspan of your specimens?

Both 36 mm. A. chamaephanes, according to the Sineva catalog, is found far from Tuva. By the way, the region is not ours, but 25 (Tuva).
And these butterflies are Loscheva. My spreadsheets and photos.

Yes, Mikhail, thank you! I already know all these details, Sergey told me.
As for the species belonging of this butterfly, as a more sophisticated colleague wrote to me, one can only objectively judge by the genitals.. Especially since Tuva, and, as Bulgakov wrote: ".. sturgeon is not the first freshness..")

Well, let's call her until Autophila sp. No objections?

Well, let's call her until Autophila sp. No objections?