Photos of collections

12.12.2015 2:34, OEV

Today, my otiorinhi have found a permanent "home". Next to them "settled" Mesostylini, Trachyphloeini and Peritelini.
I left a lot of empty space on purpose, so to speak, for the future.

Thank you Honza for the inspiration! And to everyone who shared the material!

sorry for the quality of the photo, it didn't work out better(((

Ilyukha pliz write the name of the species in the box from left to right
Krasava And I haven't put my own yet

12.12.2015 14:10, Mantispid

23.12.2015 13:46, OEV

A little elephant
Conoderinae- genus Cratosomus

Pictures:

P1010530.jpg — (1.39 mb)

23.12.2015 15:27, Mantispid

A little elephant
Conoderinae- genus Cratosomus

How many species are there?

23.12.2015 18:08, OEV

How many species are there?

Ilya in my opinion 16
Here's what I determined myself, maybe by
Cratosomus curassaviensis (Voet, 1806)
Cratosomus dumosus Boheman, 1844
Cratosomus hoplites Erichson, 1848
Cratosomus pauper Emden, 1933
Cratosomus scaber Schoenherr, 1825
Cratosomus vaginalis (Linnaeus, 1758)

This post was edited by OEV - 23.12.2015 18: 26

23.12.2015 19:06, Mantispid

Ilya in my opinion 16
Here's what I determined myself, maybe by

and I have 1 copy. One type, but I couldn't determine which one
similar to the ones on your right in the penultimate row

11.01.2016 16:35, Pavel Udovichenko

I apologize for some off-topic, but this is, in a sense, also a collection! Early 20th-century entomological paraphernalia that came to me today from London. Most entomological pins were then made of silver.

This post was edited by Entoterra - 12.01.2016 00: 02

Pictures:

DSC06427.JPG — (3.24мб)

11.01.2016 22:56, Black Coleopter

12.01.2016 13:25, Honza

Canthonini - Eurysternini

new system and adding new views

Pictures:

Scarabaeidae_19.JPG — (2.03мб)


Scarabaeidae_20.JPG — (2мб)


Scarabaeidae_21.JPG — (2.2мб)


Scarabaeidae_22.JPG — (2.73мб)


Scarabaeidae_23.JPG — (2.8мб)

16.01.2016 22:43, Bad Den

27.01.2016 10:07, ArthurAA

Subgenus Achillides (Hübner, 1819)

Pictures:

NboWD_tMFn4.jpg — (862.08к)


FZqfQNkaakM.jpg — (896.53к)


khxob9wdWK8.jpg — (1.03мб)


DZhgluCBwhY.jpg — (738.5к)


0l8tOfN2zrI.jpg — (736.26к)

17.02.2016 19:14, I.solod

antithia. other mailboxes in the topic about Anthia

This post was edited by I. solod - 18.02.2016 21: 57

Pictures:

Anthia_1.jpg — (5.76 mb)


Anthia_2.JPG — (5.82 mb)


Anthia_3.jpg — (5мб)

23.02.2016 7:52, Honza

Diphucephalini - Diplotaxini - Leucophollini

Pictures:

Melolonthinae_1.JPG — (1.81 mb)

25.02.2016 21:36, Liparus

25.02.2016 22:36, Honza

And on what page are your beetles from sem. Staphylinidae ?I can't find it...I remember you posted it once, 2 or 3 years ago...

also I can't find

This post was edited by Honza - 25.02.2016 22: 38

Pictures:

Staphylinidae___Paederinae_1.JPG — (1.94 mb)


Staphylinidae___Paederinae_2.JPG — (2.22 mb)


Staphylinidae___Paederinae_3.JPG — (1.79мб)


Staphylinidae___Paederinae_4.JPG — (1.87мб)


Staphylinidae___Paederinae_5.JPG — (1.95мб)


Staphylinidae___Paederinae_6.JPG — (2мб)


Staphylinidae___Paederinae_8.JPG — (707.52к)


Staphylinidae___Paederinae_9.JPG — (549.2к)


Staphylinidae___Aleocharinae_90.JPG — (2.15мб)


Staphylinidae_51.JPG — (632.36к)


Staphylinidae_53.JPG — (775.81к)


Staphylinidae_56.JPG — (742.34к)

25.02.2016 23:28, Honza

my collection of Staphylinidae 120 boxes

This post was edited by Honza - 25.02.2016 23: 29

Pictures:

Staphylinidae__10.JPG — (628.24к)


Staphylinidae_52.JPG — (1.56мб)


Staphylinidae_54.JPG — (734.19к)


Staphylinidae___Philonthini_1.JPG — (2.05мб)


Staphylinidae___Philonthini_8.JPG — (652.81к)


Staphylinidae___Philonthini_4.JPG — (1.94мб)


Staphylinidae___Pselaphinae__4.JPG — (2.15мб)


Scydmaenidae_3.JPG — (2.08мб)

28.02.2016 16:50, I.solod

a few cons
the name of species or subgenera in the file name, part of the result of a long-term selection by form

Pictures:

starkianus_theseus_03.jpg — (6.46 mb)


starkianus_starkianus_02.jpg — (6.63мб)


starkianus_starkianus_01.jpg — (6.47 mb)

28.02.2016 16:59, I.solod

Highly variable C. (Morphocarabus) monilis

Pictures:

monilis_03.jpg — (3.07 mb)


monilis_02.jpg — (4.01 mb)


monilis_01_3.jpg — (4.67 mb)

28.02.2016 17:15, I.solod

Some blackness - Chaetomelas, Lamprostus, Colored Lipaster and the previous subgenus

This post was edited by I. solod - 29.02.2016 00: 18

Pictures:

Lamprostus_1___Chaetocarabus.jpg — (4.88мб)


Lipaster_lamprostus.jpg — (4.23мб)


Lamprostus_2_2.jpg — (4.44мб)

12.03.2016 11:20, Honza

Melolontha

Pictures:

Melolonthinae_2.JPG — (1.95 mb)

13.03.2016 16:02, Honza

Anoxia

Pictures:

Melolonthinae_4.JPG — (2.04мб)

20.03.2016 11:58, Dorcadion

Before the start of the season, I pick up tails from previous years...
A little glitter.

Pictures:

P3200048.JPG — (2.78мб)

20.03.2016 12:04, Dorcadion

they are the same

Pictures:

P3200040.JPG — (2.72мб)


P3200041.JPG — (2.77мб)


P3200043.JPG — (2.79мб)


P3200044.JPG — (3.16 mb)


P3200047.JPG — (2.74мб)

27.03.2016 20:41, Sergey Didenko

Yes, photos of the collection are displayed only by beetles, sometimes something large tropical from butterflies, but... No, the beetles look amazing! So neatly accurately and scrupulously arranged-super! But I would like to see something from the scaly night, I probably won't have time to bring it to the "showcase" view soon. I don't even have time to sort it out badly. Only a few boxes of the smallest groups of bears were scattered by species. I put up these boxes. There are still a dozen boxes of catocals dismantled, but I'm not sure that such a narrow group is of interest to a wide circle...

Pictures:

image_27_03_16_18_41_1.jpeg — (4.12мб)


image_27_03_16_19_14.jpeg — (4.35 mb)


image_27_03_16_18_55_2.jpeg — (4.02мб)


image_13_03_16_15_35_2.jpg — (4.67мб)


image_15_03_16_15_27_2.jpeg — (1.88 mb)


image_15_03_16_15_27.jpeg — (1.77 mb)


image_27_03_16_19_23_2.jpeg — (3.45мб)


image_27_03_16_18_55_1.jpeg — (4.31 mb)


image_27_03_16_19_23_1.jpeg — (3.48 mb)

27.03.2016 21:10, AGG

27.03.2016 22:15, Sergey Didenko

30.03.2016 9:43, KONI

30.03.2016 10:41, Alexander73

30.03.2016 14:38, Sergey Didenko

Sergey, please, please catocal.

Konstantin, hi! I'll try to post it over the weekend, but there's nothing particularly outstanding there

30.03.2016 15:49, Konung

31.03.2016 11:04, Sergey Didenko

why is it narrow? quite a pop group, many people are interested, we'll be happy to see!) here are the moths - this is a narrow group)

Come on, Slava, don't be silly. Moth is a group where many people work, because there is the greatest chance of describing new taxa. Katokaly is not a pop band, but a commercial band, the material is expensive, but aesthetically very pleasant . Here is your group - thinworms-really narrow, because there are so few of them caught that it is necessary to deal with them ... By the way the group is also very commercial

31.03.2016 19:31, Konung

Come on, Slava, don't be silly. Moth is a group where many people work, because there is the greatest chance of describing new taxa. Katokaly is not a pop band, but a commercial band, the material is expensive, but aesthetically very pleasant . Here is your group - thinworms-really narrow, because there are so few of them caught that it is necessary to deal with them ... By the way the group is also very commercial

do many people work with moles?? I'm begging you)) you can count the specialists on your fingers. collectors are hardly interested in them. there are a lot of troubles with them (collecting, tattooing, straightening, everything is very small) and there is little aesthetics. We still need to try to find a new species.
the fact that thin-shells are a commercial group, there is no doubt, the prices for them sometimes break space...
waiting for your catocals, in short

02.04.2016 14:27, Sergey Didenko

I tried several times to display 13 photos of catocal boxes. The anti-spam filter doesn't let you through. It takes quite a long time to attach files, you can only do it by the piece, I don't know if I will have more time for this. Idiotic system

03.04.2016 13:23, Sergey Didenko

Another attempt to display photos. I don't believe it will work anymore. Without photos, messages pass, but as soon as I attach at least one, they tell me that my message was blocked by a spam filter. I wrote to the administrator, but he's obviously on vacation
So - not fate, catocals are not only pop, they are also spam!
Wow, a picture of 5 boxes attached, I'll try others. There should be 8 Palearctic regions and 5 North American regions. The photo of the first box did not want to be attached, I try further...the second passed, the third passed. The fourth - passed, the sixth-passed, the seventh-also, the eighth-OK. Again I try loose ones. The first one passed, and the second one also passed. I try North American all at once. In general, to prevent the spam filter from working, you need to change something in the message text after attaching the photo.
There are some inaccuracies in the boxes. I called one subspecies described a few months ago a species on the label, but I didn't make red labels for another new species

This post was edited by sdi-03.04.2016 13: 57

Pictures:

p5.jpeg — (3.93мб)


p3.jpeg — (3.53мб)


p4.jpeg — (3мб)


p6.jpeg — (3mb)


p7.jpeg — (4.34 mb)


p8.jpeg — (3.7 mb)


p1.jpeg — (4.69мб)


p2.jpeg — (3.73 mb)


A1.jpeg — (3.7 mb)


A2.jpeg — (3.39 mb)


A3.jpeg — (3.75 mb)


A4.jpeg — (3.4 mb)


A5.jpeg — (4.3 mb)

03.04.2016 18:22, Konung

03.04.2016 20:52, Sergey Didenko

Great! a good selection. pleasing to the eye!)

Some dubious expression "Good selection" somehow cuts the ear, usually this expression is applied to publications, music or video works.
When you catch many specimens with "sweat and blood", sometimes in terrible conditions, and not all catocals just fly and land on the screen, but you need to come up with various tricks to catch them... Slava, did you want to tease me or did you put it badly? Can you tell me where else I can "pick up" the missing copies? And by the way, where is your good selection of thin shells, really interesting to see.

03.04.2016 21:53, chebur

03.04.2016 21:58, Sergey Didenko

Thank you for the unique opportunity to see almost the entire world fauna of the order ribbons! Especially pleased with the view of C. didenko from Primorye. Congratulations! Is he missing the red labels?

Yes, Nikolai, there are not enough red labels on this species, but so far I have a collection with a huge number of holes from the missing taxa. 30 percent is definitely not enough, maybe even more...

03.04.2016 22:05, Pavel Morozov

03.04.2016 23:24, Victor Gazanchidis