E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Buprestids

Community and Forum → Insects images → Buprestids

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6

06.01.2009 13:59, rpanin

Eurythyrea austriaca (Linnaeus, 1767)
Body length-20 mm.
Transcarpathian region, Rakhiv district, 14. VIII. 08 on spruce decks
leg.Канарський Ю.
Well, very rare! wink.gif

This post was edited by rpanin - 28.07.2010 16: 25

Pictures:
picture: Eurythyrea _ austriaca__Linnaeus__1767__20__..jpg
Eurythyrea_austriaca__Linnaeus__1767__20__..jpg — (138.39к)

Likes: 12

20.01.2009 12:56, sebastes

Photo and scanography of Siberian coniferous zlatka.
Buprestis haemorrhoidalis sibirica (Fleischer, 1887), female, 20 mm long
, South Primorye, Spassky district, Blue Ridge, ~15 km NE s. Novovladimirovka,
cutting down in a mixed forest, 18.07.2006.
About a dozen of these goldsmiths, females and males, were bustling about on the sawn-down and
unkempt fir trunks.
picture: Bup_haem_sib.jpg picture: B_haemorrhoidalis_sib.jpg

This post was edited by sebastes - 20.01.2009 13: 07
Likes: 11

22.01.2009 14:55, sebastes

Decoration of any collection-Eurythyrea eoa (Semenov, 1895), female, length 23 mm
. South Primorye, Ussuriysky district, near the village of Kamenushka, on the sawn trunk of a Maksimovich poplar, 05.08.2006.
At that moment, I didn't dare take a picture, for fear of missing out on this rarity.
picture: Eoa1.jpg picture: Eoa2.jpg
Likes: 12

07.02.2009 16:40, Tomas.Adzkee

Euriteries are the latest, it turns out..

I always thought that apart from the agriliuses in August, nothing shines...

30.03.2009 13:50, Nilson

Neil, for some reason I'm almost sure that you have the same Capnodis carbonaria from Armenia!;)


Yes, I got it wrong. This is most likely carbonaria and is. C. tenebricosa is completely different, I'll post it soon.

30.03.2009 14:09, Aaata

Then Tomas. Adzkee. I also collected my Eurythyrea micans and Eurythyrea quercus in the North Caucasus quite late, in early August. But the most recent finds of goldsmiths I have refer to Buprestis haemorrhoidalis: the beginning-middle of September, in the Nizhny Novgorod region, and there was a mass year.

30.03.2009 14:45, Aaata

Do some zlatki fly to the light? At the very beginning of this topic, Mylabris provides this information for a species from the genus Sphenoptera. Somehow it doesn't look like "children of the sun".

30.03.2009 16:15, Fornax13

Melanophila acuminata supposedly also flies well at night. However, I only collected during the day. They're flying at the smoke, you bastards.
Likes: 1

30.03.2009 16:26, Aaata

That's why she is the gold digger of pozharishch (not in defiance of those who don't like Russian names), although I have met such a name in the literature in relation to phenops. But to fly to the electric light, something does not believe...

30.03.2009 16:55, Fornax13

In general, small sphenopters are caught more often in the evening/at night. So why not? Sometimes the light and not so flies...
Likes: 1

30.03.2009 17:05, Aaata

It doesn't fly like that, that's for sure. But, as I understood from my observations, this happens if something from the day and evening was late, or accidentally decided to spend the night, falling directly under the influence of a light source. I've never seen this happen on zlatkami before.

04.08.2009 11:55, rpanin

Coroebus florentinus (Herbst, 1801)

14. Zakarpattia region, Vinogradiv district, Chernaya Gora 12. VII. 2009

Pictures:
picture: Coroebus_florentinus__Herbst__1801___14mm.jpg
Coroebus_florentinus__Herbst__1801___14mm.jpg — (141.61к)

Likes: 15

04.08.2009 22:32, Tomas.Adzkee

Funny bastard)

10.09.2009 20:18, rpanin

Dicerca moesta (Fabricius, 1792)
16mm
Polesie, Rivne region, Rakitnyansky district, on a burnt pine tree. 19.VI.2009 leg.Kanarsky Yu.

Pictures:
picture: Dicerca_moesta__Fabricius__1792_16mm.jpg
Dicerca_moesta__Fabricius__1792_16mm.jpg — (134.67к)

Likes: 11

24.09.2009 16:07, KDG

Acmaeodera (Acmaeotethya) ottomana (Frivaldzky,1837) - Turkey, Mush prov., Buglan Gecidi, 21 05 2009

Pictures:
picture: ottomanum.jpg
ottomanum.jpg — (99.18к)

Likes: 10

24.09.2009 21:46, Liparus

Acmaeodera (Acmaeotethya) ottomana (Frivaldzky,1837) - Turkey, Mush prov., Buglan Gecidi, 21 05 2009

it's a small one, right?

24.09.2009 23:55, KDG

it's a small one, right?

5.5-6 mm. Slightly larger than antaxy.

05.02.2010 0:24, PG18

Several Ustyurt (south-west Kazakhstan) goldfinches of the 2009 season:

This post was edited by PG18-05.02.2010 00: 24

Pictures:
picture: Cyphosoma_tataricum_Dgukara_29_06.JPG
Cyphosoma_tataricum_Dgukara_29_06.JPG — (59.65к)

picture: Julodis_variolaris_Onere_14_05.jpg
Julodis_variolaris_Onere_14_05.jpg — (219.16к)

picture: Sphenophora_orichalcea_Miyaly_30_06.jpg
Sphenophora_orichalcea_Miyaly_30_06.jpg — (192.92к)

picture: Capnodis_excisa_0586_Oneri_14_05.jpg
Capnodis_excisa_0586_Oneri_14_05.jpg — (113.81к)

picture: Sphenoptera_cuprinaN_of_Beineu_6_05.jpg
Sphenoptera_cuprinaN_of_Beineu_6_05.jpg — (89.01к)

Likes: 19

06.02.2010 16:08, Дзанат

Anthaxia millefolii F. ? smile.gif Transcaucasia, August.

This post was edited by Dzanat - 07.02.2010 08: 39

Pictures:
picture: IMG_0967.jpg
IMG_0967.jpg — (171.25к)

Likes: 5

06.02.2010 18:59, Victor Titov

Anthaxia millefolii F.
Transcaucasia, August.

Hmm, and in my opinion, this is Anthaxia signaticollis Krynicki, 1832.
Anthaxia millefolii F. is quite different: http://www.zin.ru/ANIMALIA/COLEOPTERA/eng/antmilp1.htm

06.02.2010 19:57, Дзанат

I don't know much about zlatochki, so it was entrusted to specialists. It was determined with me, it was compared with the collection for a long time, I think everything is correct, and then who knows.....These are similar species, the color is variable and similar. I would check the structure of the sexual apparatus, but according to the description it is a female.

06.02.2010 20:05, Victor Titov

I don't know much about zlatochki, so it was entrusted to specialists. It was determined with me, it was compared with the collection for a long time, I think everything is correct, and then who knows.....These are similar species, the color is variable and similar. I would check the structure of the sexual apparatus, but according to the description it is a female.

Yes, it's just that A. signaticollis has a painfully characteristic color... confused.gif

06.02.2010 20:16, Дзанат

These aren't synonyms by any chance.... confused.gif
I found Anthaxia (Euanthaxia) signaticollis (Krynicki, 1832)
= Anthaxia nitidula ssp. signaticollis (Krynicki, 1832) I remember exactly what was close to nitidula, but not her.

This post was edited by Dzanat-06.02.2010 20: 30

06.02.2010 20:35, Victor Titov

These aren't synonyms by any chance.... confused.gif
I found Anthaxia (Euanthaxia) signaticollis (Krynicki, 1832)
= Anthaxia nitidula ssp. signaticollis (Krynicki, 1832) I remember exactly what was close to nitidula, but not her.

Yes, but not to Anthaxia millefolii. Anthaxia signaticollis seems to be a subspecies of Anthaxia nitidula (Anthaxia nitidula signaticollis Krynicki, 1832)

This post was edited by Dmitrich - 06.02.2010 20: 38

06.02.2010 21:00, Дзанат

Anthaxia signaticollis seems to be a subspecies of Anthaxia nitidula (Anthaxia nitidula signaticollis Krynicki, 1832)

Viktor Dmitrievich then don't confuse me, everything is correct. Fauna.Zlatki.Richter, 1949, p. 90, 91

06.02.2010 21:55, Victor Titov

Viktor Dmitrievich then don't confuse me, everything is correct. Fauna.Zlatki.Richter, 1949, pp. 90, 91

And I don't confuse you, dear Dzanat. With all due respect to A. A. Richter (mol.gif<url>), this is still 1949, more than 60 years have passed. And, then, by the way, in his understanding of Anthaxia nitidula L. It was not = Anthaxia millefolii F. In addition, today these two names are given to species belonging to different subgenera: Anthaxia (Haplanthaxia) millefolii (Fabricius, 1801) and Anthaxia (Euanthaxia) nitidula (Linnaeus, 1758) (see M. G. Volkovich - List of Goldfish (Buprestidae) of the fauna of Russia). At the same time, A. signaticollis in the modern sense is Anthaxia (Euanthaxia) signaticollis (Krynicki, 1832) = Anthaxia nitidula ssp. signaticollis (Krynicki, 1832). Applying the name Anthaxia millefolii to it is at least obsolete. That's why your photo should also be renamed. smile.gif

07.02.2010 8:38, Дзанат

07.02.2010 12:31, vasiliy-feoktistov

I'll distract you a little from the Anthaxia dispute and put up two goldsmiths:
1) Buprestis strigosa Gebler, 1830 Chita region, 1951. (unfortunately, no other data was saved).
2) Dicerca furcata Thunberg, 1787 (= acuminata Pallas, 1782 nec Degeer, 1774)
Amur region. Shimanovsk 25.07.1974 Many thanks to Alexey Sazhnev for identifying the beetle.

This post was edited by vasiliy-feoktistov - 07.02.2010 12: 44

Pictures:
picture: 1.jpg
1.jpg — (65.47 k)

picture: 2.jpg
2.jpg — (78.71 k)

Likes: 7

08.02.2010 1:19, Victor Titov

Viktor Dmitrievich then don't confuse me, everything is correct. Fauna.Zlatki.Richter, 1949, pp. 90, 91

Yes, not quite right! It's just that if you use Richter's definition of a gold leaf, you really come across Anthaxia (Euanthaxia) millefolii, which he reduced to synonyms for signaticollis (Krynicki, 1832). Now, what was millefolii according to Richter was assigned to the taxon nitidula, respectively, and became Anthaxia (Euanthaxia) signaticollis (Krynicki, 1832) = Anthaxia nitidula ssp. signaticollis (Krynicki, 1832). And the name Anthaxia millefolii is now applied not to what Richter describes in his work, but to a species belonging to another subgenus-Haplanthaxia. And the habit of Anthaxia (Haplanthaxia) millefolii is completely different from your golden beetle, since your beetle is Anthaxia (Euanthaxia) signaticollis (Krynicki, 1832) = Anthaxia nitidula ssp. signaticollis (Krynicki, 1832), I am 100% sure.
That's good, the person who identified this instance, I'm sure was aware, I'm the one who got confused here and I'm trying to remember something.

It seems to me that he used the Richter method, but he did not check with modern data, in particular, with the Volkovich list. Did you look at his list, by the way?"

No, I won't do that yet. There will be time, I will reconsider, redefine. I'll put it in question for now, at your request. smile.gif

I will look forward to the result! The most terribly interesting! So bring the question to the end!

This post was edited by Dmitrich-08.02.2010 01: 25

08.02.2010 14:20, vasiliy-feoktistov

I decided to post 2 Chrysobothris species near Moscow:
1) Chrysobothris affinis Fabricius, 1794
Found: 15.06.2000 Here: M. O. Lyuberetsky district of okr. der. Torbeevo (occasionally found on oak trees).
2) Chrysobothris (s.str.) chrysostigma Linnaeus, 1758
Found: 09.07.2000 Here: M. O. Balashikha district, okr. der. Poltevo (on coniferous trees in the mass).

Pictures:
picture: 1.jpg
1.jpg — (67.68к)

picture: 2.jpg
2.jpg — (88.49 k)

Likes: 4

08.02.2010 15:02, vasiliy-feoktistov

Agrilus biguttatus Fabricius, 1777
Found: 13.07.2003 Here: M. O. Lyuberetsky district of okr. der. Torbeevo (oak stumps).

Pictures:
picture: P2082292.jpg
P2082292.jpg — (76.3к)

Likes: 5

08.02.2010 16:07, vasiliy-feoktistov

The only one? in the Moscow region Anthaxia in nature:
Anthaxia (Melanthaxia) quadripunctata Linnaeus, 1758
Снято: 22.06.2007г. Here: M. O. Lyuberetsky district of okr. der. Torbeevo (very often on different colors).

Pictures:
picture: Anthaxia.jpg
Anthaxia.jpg — (140.28к)

Likes: 6

09.02.2010 12:43, vasiliy-feoktistov

On the topic of "smoke-loving" and late zlatkahs:
2 more zlatki from the Moscow region.
1) Melanophila (s.str.) acuminata Degeer, 1774.
2) Phaenops cyanea Fabricius, 1775.
Both zlatki collected "in the mass": 05.09.1999.(note the date). Here: M. O. Balashikha district, okr. der. Poltevo, the dying and smoking center of a forest fire, on fairly burnt coniferous logs.
So-that Phaenops cyanea can be safely called the "golden apple of pozharishch".

Pictures:
picture: 1.jpg
1.jpg — (63.48к)

picture: 2.jpg
2.jpg — (85.75 k)

Likes: 6

09.02.2010 15:05, vasiliy-feoktistov

Agrilus pratensis Ratzeburg, 1839
Found: 20.06.2000 Here: M. O. Balashikha district, okr. der. Poltevo (from time to time it is found on the grass of aspen, birch, etc.).

Pictures:
picture: P2092296.jpg
P2092296.jpg — (46.95к)

Likes: 5

28.07.2010 16:30, rpanin

? Chrysobothris chrysostigma (Linnaeus, 1758)
or Chrysobothris solieri Castelnau et Gory, 1837 ?
12 mm
Transcarpathia, Marmarosh, on coniferous decks.

This post was edited by rpanin - 28.07.2010 22: 05

Pictures:
картинка: Chrysobothris_chrysostigma__Linnaeus__1758_.jpg
Chrysobothris_chrysostigma__Linnaeus__1758_.jpg — (112.22к)

Likes: 6

29.07.2010 9:12, Liparus

? Chrysobothris chrysostigma (Linnaeus, 1758)
or Chrysobothris solieri Castelnau et Gory, 1837 ?
12 mm
Transcarpathia, Marmarosh, on coniferous decks.


Yes, this is Chrysobothris chrysostigma

This post was edited by Liparus - 29.07.2010 09: 13
Likes: 1

29.07.2010 11:04, rpanin

Yes, this is Chrysobothris chrysostigma

How did you determine it?

29.07.2010 11:16, vasiliy-feoktistov

I somehow doubt that chrysostigma is (the second one, unfortunately, I don't know from M. O.). Post # 71 I posted chrysostigma-it's different (it seems to me) confused.gif.
Likes: 1

08.12.2010 11:15, Igorvet

Julodis sp. 09.05.2010 Afganistan, Nangarhar, Jelalabad circ. 570 m. I'm not very good at zlatkahs, but I think they're different types.

Pictures:
picture: P1080909.JPG
P1080909.JPG — (178.47к)

Likes: 6

08.12.2010 17:15, Liparus

  Julodis sp. 09.05.2010 Afganistan, Nangarhar, Jelalabad circ. 570 m. I'm not very good at zlatkahs, but I think they're different types.

This is a male and a female.
Likes: 1

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.