Cataloging photos of butterflies from the Forum on the site Insecta.pro

Here it is: I wanted to give a link to my site, but it won't let me in, it thought I was a spammer )

Don't mind

Only for!

Yeah

I already upload my photos in the catalog guide, at: http://macroid.ru/, under the auspices of the macro club http://macroclub.ru/. But I don't mind putting my photos on the Internet. http://lepidoptera.ru/ I don't mind. The more such qualifiers there are in Russian , the better!

This post was edited by bials - 24.06.2009 18: 14

I agree.And I don't even mind at all.

My photos of butterflies are still here at this address: http://macroclub.ru/gallery/showgallery.ph...500/ppuser/5262

I agree!!!!

I agree
Additional photos on the site specified in the profile. I registered for lepidoptere.

Always for

Previous post my

Well, and thumbnails, as on leps.it by families or even better, as in UK Moths, by families/subfamilies would clearly not hurt.

Do you mean previews of each family in the list of families, or all previews of all photos of a particular family?..

About the presence of a descriptionphoto: it is possible to do as on leps.it, if there is a description - a square with the letter "O", if the photo is "F" .

I didn't get the notification, but I don't mind.
http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=80910
http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=80398

OK, thanks. In these topics, you passed as a guest, and not under your own nickname, so there was no message.

About the presence of a descriptionphoto: it is possible to do as on leps.it, if there is a description - a square with the letter "O", if the photo is "F".

We will come up with a visual, we must first programmatically separate the flies from the non-flies...

Don't mind

I agree, on lepidoptera.ru registered.

I agree.
Registered on the site.

Ok

Agree

Agree. Good idea. I often view photos and questions in the forum, so as not to ask a second time. this will be much more convenient.

Agree

More qualifiers, good and different!
Agree.

I agree.

I agree.

Don't mind. You can only scare children with my pictures

This post was edited by scarabee - 26.06.2009 07: 23

I agree, and I'm even very glad that my photos can be useful to someone.

But I'll hold off for now.
1. The idea is not clear to the end, the concept is not developed. Concept development, etc. This is the responsibility of photo contributors.
In principle, and I'm not exactly against it, but:
2. the impression is created that Asar is trying to increase traffic to its site and earn money from the placed advertising.

Here, such thoughts. Think of me as whatever you want. I've spoken out.
ban, foul, my opinion is this.

Pshch!11 You're frozen

I will also refrain from participating. An original, interesting concept from lepidoptera.ru not yet. The swing to everything at once speaks for itself. An impossible undertaking, too heavy. The stage of the shovel gnawing and hawk moth pine will be overcome very quickly. In general, it has already been overcome. What's next? The same as others - a warehouse of photos, of which there are hundreds on the web. Who is interested in galleries of dubiously defined butterflies? No one is interested in them! Entomologists need the opportunity to discuss their findings and identify them together. This is done on the forum. Interesting communication and it is already available on molbiol-le.

But I'll hold off for now.
1. The idea is not clear to the end, the concept is not developed. Concept development, etc. This is the responsibility of photo contributors.
In principle, and I'm not exactly against it, but:
2. the impression is created that Asar is trying to increase traffic to its site and earn money from the placed advertising.

And I will abstain.
I didn't want to interfere in the general idyll, especially since my photos in the topic "Definition..." once or twice became scarce, but once such a topic went-IMHO, the site is frankly weak, made at an amateur level. Here I go to the first description of the taxon that comes across:
Hopworm prefers to fly not just anywhere, but in the wet lowlands and not ever, but at dusk.
I'm not exactly against it either, but to participate in such a project (as it currently stands) I'm not interested. Moreover, there is an opportunity to participate in much more professionally made projects MacroID or "Butterflies of Europe".

Morozzz
I don't have any ads displayed. Does the site have ads?

I will also refrain from participating. An original, interesting concept from lepidoptera.ru not yet. The swing to everything at once speaks for itself. An impossible undertaking, too heavy. ..............

Well said! I'll join you.

And I will abstain.
I didn't want to interfere in the general idyll, especially since my photos in the topic "Definition..." once or twice became scarce, but once such a topic went-IMHO, the site is frankly weak, made at an amateur level. Here I go to the first description of the taxon that comes across:
Hopworm prefers to fly not just anywhere, but in the wet lowlands and not ever, but at dusk.
I'm not exactly against it either, but to participate in such a project (as it currently stands) I'm not interested. Moreover, there is an opportunity to participate in much more professionally made projects MacroID or "Butterflies of Europe".

Morozzz
I don't have any ads displayed. Does the site have ads?

Duc, this is my speculation and that's all.
Who knows? Anything can happen. I thought about it and expressed myself.

Well, yes. I'll agree too. The project is amateur (although there is nothing wrong with this), so does it make sense to post photos of caterpillars of the first age of some little-known volnyanka on it?
Who needs it, he will find it on the forum, Google it, etc.

Well, in order to bring it to a more or less professional, or rather "scientifically combed" level, you need to start everything from a blank list

- 100% FOR such an undertaking. - systematized catalog of photos of species with names - necessary as air!
- I haven't registered on this site yet, but I hope to find a convenient menu tree there, where you can find the desired view and determine (compare) your own.
- The main thing is the quality of the image and the authenticity of the name.
- Photos of undergarments are very desirable where it is necessary for identification.
- If there are extreme forms (morphs, subspecies, and even aberrations-let them also be).
- If there are synonyms and outdated names , this is also useful.
- It would be good to indicate the wingspan, gathering place and food plants of the caterpillars.
- A photo of the caterpillar is also desirable.
- Place and time of the image-required.
- And let the site administration make sure that the photos are improved. - That is, if a better image appears, replace it with it. "This requires a quarantine, buffer, or some sort of sump tank. It is better if the issue of choice is decided by the administration, and not by voting , because then there will be a terrible tigamotina and red tape.
- Number of images of the same type - must not exceed 2 or 3 (in different angles)
- If you also need my photo information , I will be happy to make my own contribution by sending the disk by mail.

- And my huge moral support, attentiveness and inspiration to the administrators, initiators and devotees of this PRICELESS project!
Sincerely, Andreas.

I agree, of course.

Let them be.

P.S. If a photo of a butterfly found on the forum pages is posted
without a specific name, will it be used or not?

I agree. If necessary, I can provide photos in the original format.

P.S. If a photo of a butterfly found on the forum pages is posted
without a specific name, will it be used or not?

Probably not. The exception is highly aesthetic photos (subjective).

- I haven't registered on this site yet, but I hope to find a convenient menu tree there, where you can find the desired view and determine (compare) your own.

With the gallery — I think so already, although adding features is still planned. With descriptions (catalog) — in progress. You can watch everything without registration.

- Photos of undergarments are very desirable where it is necessary for identification.

There are places where the corresponding photos were posted at all. Maybe I'll add a photo search item (underside/top/collection/field, etc.), discussed.

- If there are extreme forms (morphs, subspecies, and even aberrations-let them also be).

Само собою.

If there are synonyms and outdated names , this is also useful.

There is.

It would be a good idea to indicate the wingspan, gathering place, and food plants of the caterpillars.

Size and forage-in the description of the species. Location of collection / shooting — the authors indicate that the functionality will also be updated by July 1 so that this information (as well as the time of shooting) is available on the site.

A photo of the caterpillar is also desirable.

All stages — if the authors have such images.

Place and time of the snapshot-required.

See above.

And let the site administration make sure that the photos are improved. - That is, if a better image appears, replace it with it.

In the descriptions, as new images become available, the default photos for each stage of development are constantly updated. In the future, the gallery will delete obvious duplicates of the worst quality (currently there are not so many of them).

Number of images of the same type - no more than 2 or 3 (in different angles)

Why? This is not a book where space is limited. Nothing prevents you from taking not 2, but 20 photos so that the user can choose which ones are interesting to them. I repeat that the "default" photos are only one for each stage.

If you also need my photo information , I will be happy to make my own contribution by sending the disk by mail.

Of course, you need it. Specify the contents of Yandex. Disk. Perhaps you can even send it through the Network.

Thank you for your detailed comments.