All Insecta.pro Comments
Community and Forum → All comments feed
All the latest comments on topics, photos and species on the site in reverse chronological order.
Show: All comments in a row. All comments, except for the technical ones.
Pages: 1 ...575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583... 629
Moved.
Moved/activated.
Ok, done.
Moved to E. penelope.
Goes to.
To go.
Moved/activated.
Moved to A. albicans.
Guys, who commented this photo?
Syngamia florella (Stoll, 1781).
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
Dmitry! I've got it in a tightly closed box, lazy to open. Shot that about five years ago (even rather scanned).
Constantine sent one hundred and fifty new images; -)
Ok, moved.
This one also went to males.
Ok, male is male.
This species is identified correctly.
Нет, ну чем не энтомолог (в глазах широких масс)? Фото отсюда - Статуя Дуримара в киевском Зоопарке как по мне - на Л.А.Шелюжко похож(слева) и на Ю.П.Некрутенко (справа): Сообщение было отредактировано palvasru4ko - 28.02.2011 20:17
Good. Moved.
To "uncertain".
Ok then, moved.
Well, let it be like this then. As for differences between claudina subspecies and also other species, I fully agree.
To go.
Moved.
Moved.
Moved.
Including with no specific butterflies.
Thanks, moved.
Thanks for the tip. Corrected.
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=maculi.../88/JpgfFDxxbp0
Moved.
Shot moved.
Ok, thank you, will ask if there are difficulties.
New arrivals in the gallery.
To go.
Thanks, moved.
Ok then, moved.
Thyris kasachstanica Zagulajev, 1987 Казахстан, июль
Evgeny Karolinsky's comment is moved from the species photo page to the description one. I'd like to pay attention once more to that: on the species photo page you may discuss the very shot, is it good or not, what species is on it. But the species features, e. g. its taxonomic status, is possible to discuss only at the species description page. Also, being at the species photo page you can press ...
С праздником,МУЖЧИНЫ!
Vitali, the catalog - the types and in the gallery - photography. I think you are a little confusing variety of choice for both. Sort by year in the directory - sorting, the description of the type, for example, Linnaeus ... And for months - in the same directory have selected.Indication of hours and minutes (for the photo?) Optional, and giving - giving information about the time of the activity ...
This species is identified correctly.
Vitali is not entirely true. In many species have brown / brown and gray. And nothing more. That's such - yes, a lot of options. In the first place they will have up to 25 kinds of crop. But the more complete set of colors and the unusual colors (eg, green), the better the system works.This, by itself, the color of it is not necessary to count on a sure sign to determine, but the help it can ...
Questionable ssp. suellus, Staudinger, 1878: some authors move it to porcellus synonyms, others (e. g., Catalogue of the Lepidoptera of Russia, 2008) consider it as a species itself. Also, the Catalogue says that suellus is expanded in Siberia (Baikal region), so it's a question who can be in Astrakhan region then.
This species is identified correctly.
News
- 22.05.2024: Еще одна цветовая схема
- 14.05.2024: Выложен первый полностью функциональный раздел перенесенного форума
- 09.04.2024: Recognition of species/taxa by file names of uploaded photos has become more convenient
New photos (25.07.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 14:37, P. Khramov: Not identified → Ophion luteus / Co...
- 11:28, N. Grebennikov: Ophion luteus (Linnaeus, 1758)....
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Meanwhile, at the "Reptilium"
- Meanwhile, in Kotelnich
- 20th International Insect Fair in Moscow (Russia, October 2023)
- Butterflies and music: The Cure, The Caterpillar
