All comments on Insecta.pro, except for the technical ones

Community and Forum → All comments feed
All the latest comments on topics, photos and species on the site in reverse chronological order.
Show: All comments in a row. All comments, except for the technical ones.

Pages: 1 ...69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77... 218

29.10.2014 21:36, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34701

And this as we share? it shall be for the background :) or a duplicate, if necessary to help Peter. :)

29.10.2014 20:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34470

Adelpha sp. Adelpha alala?

29.10.2014 16:44, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #34708

Fixed

29.10.2014 16:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34491

For discussions)))

29.10.2014 9:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34703

Alexander, cook something wingless females (at least ours) and it is not necessary: they are all good in appearance vary))) And if cooking is then a matter of her and stabbing is not necessary, and a wool. You're right: it was like a beetle. Pinned her to the pin: in time all the seams will die .... On the way and cruise mount (micro).A matter of taste, in short)))

28.10.2014 19:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Ourapteryx

Already there :) In general, for such issues is a separate issue: http://lepidoptera.ru/community/18428 and ask them better there.

28.10.2014 12:42, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Lycaena violacea

Celastrina ladon (Cramer, [1780]), but in any case, not Lycaena violacea. someone, something messed up synonyms.

28.10.2014 10:58, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34686

Of the two prelozhenie, I choose Speyeria coronis.

28.10.2014 8:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #33650

Nothing more to do with it is not necessary - it is in his place.

28.10.2014 6:31, Alexander Belousov: comment on Dichagyris orientis

Peter brought to the "ideal". Extra subspecies on this page still have! D. o. pseudosignifera (Boursin, 1952). D. o. pseudosignifera (Boursin, 1952). D. o. pygmaea (Hampson, 1903). D. o. pygmaea (Hampson, 1903). And then you can clean up and comments.

27.10.2014 22:15, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6084

Whose will ?!

27.10.2014 22:14, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #34654

Where the label? (looking sternly.)

27.10.2014 21:51, Alex Dumchus: comment on photo #24120

In females Duphia quite thin mustache. Well, still, of course, the author of the artistic efforts of color. Look D.avia and D.fraterna

27.10.2014 20:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #33267

Marumba sperchius?

27.10.2014 18:13, Bad Den: comment on Stereomicroscope

Zdravtsvuyte why stereomicroscopes are not entered in Gosreetsr SI?This question can most likely be answered in Gosreetsre SI

27.10.2014 11:24, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #16403

Well, thank you for the good advice, Peter! How had not guessed, because very friendly terms with the English)) .. Load - and a very different result, much clearer)

27.10.2014 10:59, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #34662

In the comments to mean - a source of information about more adequate title and this is the name. Then I bear.

27.10.2014 10:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on Ypthima argus

http://eol.org/pages/149296/names/synonyms http://www.nic.funet.fi/index/Tree_of_life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/papilionoidea/nymphalidae/satyrinae/ypthima/ Even if you leave Ypthima argus, the views are not described (Fabricius, 1775) !!! and Butler, 1878 Fabricius described Papilio baldus Fabricius, 1775. I do not know what motivated the team blue.

26.10.2014 23:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34659

Yes, I know: all went through. Variability of course she, wild :)

26.10.2014 22:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33497

Also I agree. Himself put it. Yes pictured by Svetlana it is also determined repeatedly. Apparently, the absence of red spots me and confused (

26.10.2014 20:33, Alex Dumchus: comment on photo #34627

The second I got enough from a reputable source, though ....

26.10.2014 19:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34652

It also Cymothoe haynae, as I understand?

26.10.2014 16:29, AlisaInAsia: comment on Contents of lampposts

there is no information about the content anywhere. Those who start messing around with new animals are always difficult. As far as I know, no one was involved in their breeding and maintenance. I searched for articles in English as well.I cut the bark from the tree where they graze. I saw 5 more pieces there.I cut more bark from other trees, because it's very tough. I'll look for a similar tree ...

26.10.2014 15:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34193

Urbanus dorantes cramptoni

26.10.2014 14:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34539

Alexander, you can fix it, even if that line the author wrote only one letter. If it does not say anything, then it is not available to moderation :)

26.10.2014 13:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #33274

I had 2 options)))

26.10.2014 13:14, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34548

Basil, for these two photos, to agree with the author and Eugene, it is only suitable for the dissemination of this type and color close to it Pyrrhopyge pelota has a yellow fringe.

26.10.2014 12:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34603

subspecies churchi - endemic to the island

26.10.2014 0:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34464

Pronophila unifasciata?

26.10.2014 0:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34472

Pedaliodes tucca?

26.10.2014 0:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34481

Pedaliodes obscura?

26.10.2014 0:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34427

Pedaliodes obscura?

26.10.2014 0:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34486

Magneuptychia modesta?

25.10.2014 19:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34163

DVasily! / So much for the good of Fiji and suitable site http://www.usp.ac.fj/fileadmin/current_site/fijimoths/families-id.php

25.10.2014 15:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34534

Oh, you and I have any kind of race did not notice. Horseflies and old.

25.10.2014 11:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34581

Did. Today, just a couple of the same species there, bezetiketochnyh in inaccurate or neoprene. I put, so I asked)

25.10.2014 9:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34588

He added underside and changed over.

25.10.2014 1:51, Peter Khramov: comment on Hypomecis phantomaria

MOVED.

24.10.2014 23:52, Peter Khramov: comment on Olethreutes spiraeana

Because in the conflict between the types of infe Fauna Evropeey and the blue of the default priority at Fauna. But synonymous added, so that the search in any case will be triggered for both options.

24.10.2014 23:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34579

Label, alas, hopelessly lost, and Parnassius sp. some very beautiful. FemaleParnassius actius? nomiona subspecies or some? Does not think they entirely. Can a knowledgeable person will bring to mind the image and useful for the site?

24.10.2014 21:16, Peter Khramov: comment on Olethreutes subtilana

Done.

24.10.2014 19:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34423

Perisama or Orophila but kind of pass. We need underside

24.10.2014 19:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Odonestis lipara

Peter, figure it out, please. It turns out that one species in the genus. And this kind was created by mistake, due to confusion in the classification (Photography I suffered and the grounds are now here: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/33650