All comments on Insecta.pro, except for the technical ones

Community and Forum → All comments feed
All the latest comments on topics, photos and species on the site in reverse chronological order.
Show: All comments in a row. All comments, except for the technical ones.

Pages: 1 ...91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99... 218

03.02.2014 23:43, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #1836

Fixed. Fedor, please comment the species (photo is a feature of a species) on the very species description page, not photo one. Anyway thanks for the hint.

03.02.2014 22:09, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27226

Hurried. Synev describes the species without ssp., later we should solve this question, so far let's follow Synev :)

03.02.2014 17:17, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #27280

Why it's ok.

02.02.2014 22:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #22619

While there is this feature, I add here photo of its biotope. Biotope of this species is thinned pine plantings with some rare raspberries which had larvae concentrated in them.

02.02.2014 22:10, Sergei Kotov: comment on photo #16342

Also some weirdo.

02.02.2014 21:31, Sergei Kotov: comment on Cucullia fuschsiana

This page is a duplicate of this here: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/7125 Reserves subject to immediate removal.

02.02.2014 21:24, Sergei Kotov: comment on Cucullia gozmanyi

On this page a glitch.

02.02.2014 16:30, Sergei Kotov: comment on Catocala kotschubeyi

This page is a duplicate of this here: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/22421 Reserves must be removed.

02.02.2014 16:00, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27228

Vasily, I see the ID is correct. Only this species has such outer margin whilst two others have a narrow dark sripe between the white band and the curved outer band. Here it's wide instead :)

02.02.2014 15:59, Sergei Kotov: comment on Catocala coniuncta

What a bug on this page.

02.02.2014 15:30, Svetlana Shchavelina: comment on photo #27224

:) Blur... Aesthetics... Photoshop rules :) ACDSee has some special button, I tried that two years ago, quickly got fed up, also didn't see where to use such thing.

01.02.2014 21:58, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27205

Yep, this pic added to few forums, I think no chance.

01.02.2014 20:27, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #27107

Vladimir, please refrain from uploading pics with any marks in them.

01.02.2014 20:23, Peter Khramov: comment on Behounekia freyeri

Thanks for the tip, is ready.

01.02.2014 17:42, Igor Ivannikov: comment on photo #27202

The collection year is noted correctly.

01.02.2014 13:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27130

So Notodontidae...... Myself I added here three Notodontidae from Moscow region, had no idea........... Shame on me :( Wasted half yesterday to find.....

01.02.2014 10:03, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #26816

Let's leave in Enarmonia formosana, definitely not Celypha lacunana.

31.01.2014 21:23, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #27188

Yeah, cleared that out.

31.01.2014 20:02, Peter Khramov: comment on Apameina

Eddie, thanks for the tip. Please unsubscribe at other times comments to leave it on the pages of these specific delivery.

31.01.2014 2:55, Vladimir Bobow: comment on photo #27095

Thanks! That's my old hobby.

30.01.2014 19:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27143

Surely http://www.whatsthatbug.com/2013/01/19/palmking-from-malaysia/

30.01.2014 16:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27141

Common species apparently (lots came from there). I believe you'll do :)

30.01.2014 16:20, Lev Bely: comment on Not lazy sloths, algae and moths

Biologists wondered a lot why sloths known for their extraordinary inactivity came off trees... for a toilet procedures. Whilst these mysterious critters are evidently in more safe when staying atop rather then being down on the forest floor, once a week they still leave their secure monastery and descend on the floor. Some even have favourite trees to come again and again with their toilet ...

30.01.2014 15:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27135

Vladimir, I wanted to ask you, please don't mark the checkboxes "confidently/tentatively" (don't use anyway that part of the upload form), same with not identified specimens, don't confirm them as there are bugs following. Thanks a lot for your pics, very helpful :)

30.01.2014 14:59, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #27136

Right, this is S. caecus indeed. Confirm.

30.01.2014 6:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #14006

This and #14007 are the same specimen? If so, have to be connected in one group.

29.01.2014 19:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27127

Thanks, I though I collected all them out.......... And here is this. Congratulations! Considering current climate changes, we may see the areal spread :)

29.01.2014 15:50, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #27108

I noticed yesterday that chronological lapse. First there was a confirmation of the ID, then the very ID. Though that was just mere technical bug.

29.01.2014 8:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #27055

Quite a demodocus. Also distributed in Mauritius.

28.01.2014 13:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #6981

The US... Could be tentatively moved to Pyralidae looking at how it posed the antennae.

28.01.2014 2:59, Peter Khramov: comment on Glottulini

Thanks, I've corrected it.

27.01.2014 22:26, Peter Khramov: comment on Eustroma aerosum

I rename this kind of double and removed.

27.01.2014 22:18, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #27036

Why it's still there, the author noted that during upload, so the author is identifier whilst Alexandr did confirm.

27.01.2014 22:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27070

Ok, won't prompt anymore. About to add some more now :)

27.01.2014 22:16, Peter Khramov: comment on Phyllodes imperialis

It's just a glitch at startup. Remove excess, thanks for the tip.

27.01.2014 21:05, Eddy Verfaillie: comment on Hadena bicruris

Apparently there is still a discussion about the distribution of bicruris and capsincola. If we follow the Fauna Europaea, then the photos of the species of Serbia should be capsincola and not bicruris.