All Insecta.pro Comments

Community and Forum → All comments feed
All the latest comments on topics, photos and species on the site in reverse chronological order.
Show: All comments in a row. All comments, except for the technical ones.

Pages: 1 ...318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326... 627

19.08.2015 17:51, Mihail Nyzhnikov: comment on photo #42287

This species is identified correctly.

19.08.2015 16:41, Peter Khramov: comment on Now you can attach a photo, not only to species but also subspecies, as well as supra taxa

Different people need different sample. And another opportunity to hurt nobody. As for the technical part - the sample well subspecies check glitches in the binding. Imprecisely to the genus and family can be exactly the same as before the species. Like, that's the kind of, but not 100% sure.Not with regards to the theme - as I wrote above, the tree taxa need to rectify, this is no argument ...

19.08.2015 16:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #32697

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

19.08.2015 15:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Helotropha leucostigma

Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 31—39 mm. Flight time: No formalized data → July, August.

19.08.2015 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11186

Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Vlad Proklov.

19.08.2015 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11185

Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Vlad Proklov.

19.08.2015 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11162

Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Vlad Proklov.

19.08.2015 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5246

Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Vlad Proklov.

19.08.2015 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5245

Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Vlad Proklov.

19.08.2015 15:03, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #10577

Corrected data.

19.08.2015 14:59, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #28893

Just now some changes appointment of the second line ("Update"). Now, to write: 1. Shapes, morphs, etc. (as before) 2.Subspecies only if the site is not yet wound up appropriate subspecies, and therefore it is impossible to snap a photo directly (before the subspecies does not tied, so always wrote subtypes, regardless of whether the desired site). Do you agree?

19.08.2015 14:56, Peter Khramov: comment on Ideopsis

Thanks for the tip, fixed.

19.08.2015 14:06, Peter Khramov: comment on Improvements "galleries" on the pages of taxa

But who and how will note that they are different species? Prog, after all, is unknown, different or not they are different. She knows only that the determination to superspecies taxon, not to the species, and it adds an automatic "sp".

19.08.2015 9:10, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #42275

Corrected data. Not identified → Lomographa bimaculata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.08.2015 9:05, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #42250

Corrected data. Male → Female.

19.08.2015 9:05, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #42249

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Female / Artem Strizhov.

19.08.2015 9:04, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #42248

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Male / Artem Strizhov.

19.08.2015 9:03, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #42247

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Male / Artem Strizhov.

19.08.2015 9:03, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #42252

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Female / Artem Strizhov.

19.08.2015 9:02, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #42251

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Female / Artem Strizhov.

19.08.2015 9:00, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #42272

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Female / Alexander Belousov.