Pages: 1 ...39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47... 52
Mimopydna pallida (Butler, 1877) is an only species of this genus in Russian Far East. Synev describes it as Besaia pallida (Butler, 1877) and doesn't mention in Nizhnee Priamurye. Not confusing though as there's first proved found of Mimopydna pallida in the continent part of Russian Far East (Bychikha village, Khabarovsk region) which was described in the publication of V. V. Dubatolov and ...
Another toughie) Met this just once on the web, here http://tupian.baike.com/a0_11_48_20300001248577132825484590422_jpg.html?prd=so_tupian called Botyodes diniasalis . However I know both Botyodes in Primorye. According to Synev they're out in Nizhnee Priamurye still it's not about location but they just look different... Rather that website goes wrong. Can anyone say genus at least?)
I thought the very same at first, pallens, but that spot confused me. Now when you elucidated about "floating" features I vote too for pallens)
Alexandr, thanks. I neither thought about impura looking at the rest let alone the dot, that's why I prudently questioned this, just to clear this up for future cases)
The third dot though not clear in its forewing is doubtful...(http://www.lepiforum.de/2_forum.pl?md=read;id=13959) I'd like to clear up the question, am I doubting wrongly or this is still impura? Please say something.
I did one second earlier)) But you was faster in Lemyra boghaika whilst I was looking for synonyms in Synev)))
Lemyra jankowskii (Oberthür, [1881]) Synev lacks this genus though mentioned in many books as a species distributed in Russia, especially in Primorye and Khabarovsk region.
Sergey, your confidence ... to be envied not only in this case. Decide dear moderators, where to put. But I want to Add- not seen in nature, and those and others. In nature sputaesh- easily distinguished by size (venatus larger), color (no gray underside greenish ginger).The underside venatus have very uniform, feeble spots, sometimes even indistinguishable. The question mark delivered more for ...
There are lots of them to compare. The patter is the same, but big difference can be due to difference light, shot angles and just overall lightning. Last summer I shot the same specimen in different light, 4 times.... Looked like 4 different species) Can be distinguished by pattern only)
Tanaorhinus viridiluteatus (Walker, 1861) http://taibif.tw/zh/catalogue_of_life/page/0211-3c5b-db17-04d8-286a-7592-0181-ef7e-namecode-345308
Still I think this is it. The rest 5 Pleuroptya in Primorye are way more different, only could be compared to harutai. Here are its pics on the web: http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/63_Crambidae/6109_Pyraustinae/610905200_Pleuroptya/610905212_Pleuroptya_harutai_1634/Pleuroptya_harutai.htm http://www.geocities.jp/otatsugio/ga/639-119-ookibara.html
Ectropis sp. I would say that the most likely Ectropis excellens http://catocala.narod.ru/geom122.html. In this region, there are only a 2 to Sinev. What confused ... Some sites are still given a separate species Ectropis bistortata, for example in the same Atlas Berlova - and there it is very similar to excellens http://catocala.narod.ru/geom132.htm (his image on the network a lot). But most ...
Eugene, thank you very much! Of course, not aquilina) And as I ugorazdilo) .. sylvanus? Not ochracea, not subhyalina, not venatus, I think. You have to start DV tolstogolovok put and deal) I hope for your help.
But in Sinev still Bastilla is a kind of two kinds - Bastilla arctotaenia (Guenee, 1852) and B.maturata (Walker, 1858). Other species assigned to Dysgonia. Why do you want to delete this page?
The options do not. But I again do not understand anything. Dear moderators, please explain all the same sequence of actions, it's got to be one ..Why in some cases, we are looking for here on the website, view, synonym, and often find (do not cite examples, a lot of them), and in other cases you make a page with a new species, although the site there are synonymous to it? As in this case ...
Dysgonia (Bastilla) fulvotaenia, probably. It was her yellow medial band on the rear cr, unlike other species. See. Diagnosis http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-15-16/ophiusini/ophiusini_8_10.php
Thank you Vasily Sergienko, gave confused in these difficult Acronicta) Maybe you see another photo in which bending is also very similar to the bond concerpta, especially in Yap. sites lepidoptera.ru/gallery/27134?
1. Use Triaena, because It provides links to Yap. sites where race Triaena. The brackets and pointed valid name. 2. We focus on Sinev, and Sinev (resp. Here) intermedia - a separate species. 3. I thought it closer to the intermedia, cuspis gave the second var-t. Perhaps mistaken both.
Anywhere. Why somewhere to endure, if the type is not defined yet? I just suggested. Jpmoth.org In addition, there are others. Sources such http://bioinfo.lowtem.hokudai.ac.jp/db/modules/zukan/index.php?action=node&node_id=557. Perhaps will et al. Assumption / definitions are the same or more faithful.
Perhaps, Triaena (Acronicta) intermedia http://catocala.narod.ru/noc104.html http://www.jpmoth.org/Noctuidae/Acronictinae/Triaena_intermedia.html http://bioinfo.lowtem.hokudai.ac.jp/db/modules/zukan/index.php?action=node&node_id=519 or Triaena (Acronicta) cuspis ...
Perhaps one of the two Hylonycta - catocaloida or carbonaria. Wrote Hylonycta - as they are the Japanese in this genus (search). There - Acronicta. And in general, and Viminia rumicis (our Acronicta rumicis) in the Far variant is not excluded http://www.jpmoth.org/Noctuidae/Acronictinae/Viminia_rumicis.html
Well, Alexander has already said, do not look, and is looking for writing), I think, and on the need to immediately Nemophora Nemophora schrencki i correct.
Peter task) Yeah, I mean, what is wrong schrenkii. On others. Websites - schrenSkii. Looked Sinev ... Full set eyes run ...) Nemophora schrencki (c C, but with one i), Amphipyra schrenkii (without C, but with two ii), and finally Ninguta and Amuriana schrenckii (with the C, and c two ii). That's the last thing I think is true. Who says that? (In any case, a page to be deleted)
Here I give two IDs: Epinotodonta leucodera (Staudinger, 1887) (according to Synev), and Hexafrenum leucodera (Staudinger, 1892) — jpmoth.org and other websites. Giving both as our website has both. Need to decide where to move.
Checked again all 4 species in Nizhnee Priamurye, still think this is Hypomecis crassestrigata. If the previous link isn't confirming enough, here's another just in case http://blog.daum.net/squirrel56/8716596
Most probably this is Cleora cinctaria (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775). There's another species insolita in Far East (in this region), yet doesn't fit (http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Ennominae/Cleora_insolita.html), nor leucophaea (Primorye).