Pages: 1 ...41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49... 52
No, Eddie, in Primorye only minimus and argiades. This is definitely one of the coastal species Celastrina.
Looks quite similar to Japanese Apocleora rimosa (Butler, 1878) http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Ennominae/Apocleora_rimosa.html http://mushinavi.com/navi-insect/data-ga_edasyaku_kurokumo.htm (more shots available) Yet there is no such species in Far East according to Synev (I checked as well Сleora genus which has only three species in Far East (2 of them are in 37th region), no one ...
Suppose Peridea gigantea Butler, 1877 http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/75_Notodontidae/3138_Peridea/3139%20Peridea%20gigantea/Peridea%20gigantea.htm Yet have a question: Japanese websites say that the species has monetaria ssp. in Far East which was also mentioned by P. Morozov on molbiol.ru ("Our moths belong to ssp. monetaria Oberthür, 1879 which is as well distributed in Northeast China, Korea ...
Hypomecis too. Perhaps one of two Far Eastern subspecies of Hypomecis roboraria? (http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Ennominae/Hypomecis_roboraria_displicens.html)
Most likely Hypomecis crassestrigata (Christoph, 1881) http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Ennominae/Hypomecis_crassestrigata_crassestrigata.html
Quite curious moth) This is Goniorhynchus, but the species... According to Synev, there is only one Goniorhynchus in Far East, Goniorhynchus explicatalis (Christoph, 1881). Yet there's rather recent publication by A. N. Streltsov, V. V. Dubatolov and A. M. Dolghikh called "New founds of Pyraloidea in Bolshehehtsirsky State Natural Reserve (near Khabarovsk) in 2008—2011 yy. (Amursky Zoological ...
He is the (only 2 species in the Russian Far East, in the south of second- Kurilkih Islands lives). On the territory of the Russian Far East - a subspecies genzana Matsumura, 1927
Probably Sineugraphe exusta (Butler, 1878)? http://www.jpmoth.org/Noctuidae/Noctuinae/Sineugraphe_exusta.html
Could be Gazoryctra macilentus (Eversmann, 1851)? (= spinifera Tshistjakov, 1996). (or Gazoryctra ganna, doubt between these two)
Here there is some doubt between the two species - in five living in the RFE. I would put all the same to Amphipoea fucosa (Freyer, 1830), but inaccurate, because there is a very similar type of Amphipoea ussuriensis (Petersen, 1914), in the 37th region, too frequent. Maybe someone will update ..?
Could be to confidently identified, there are only 2 species in Russian Far East, the second, yoshinoensis, though is in Prymorye only.
Could be moved to confidently identified as there are only Smerinthus caecus and planus in this region (and Prymorye).
Deilephila askoldensis (Oberthür, 1879) http://www.jpmoth.org/Sphingidae/Macroglossinae/Deilephila_askoldensis.html
Vasily, this is Miltochrista striata (Bremer & Grey, 1852). No need in adding species (many sources though do refer this to Barsine).
Pseudebulea fentoni ssp. ussuriensis Munroe & Mutuura, 1968 (2 pics, http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/27105 were connected by the author in one group, they're clearly not the same specimen yet the species is the same)
Notarcha basipunctalis. I wrote this ID for according to Synev the species belongs to the Notarcha genus http://lepidoptera.pro/taxonomy/18826. Foreign websites though refer the species to the Haritalodes genus (see http://www.jpmoth.org/Crambidae/Pyraustinae/Haritalodes_basipunctalis.html). Here we've got the Haritalodes genus but with only one species http://lepidoptera.pro/taxonomy/26187. I ...
Why hurry?) Someone might confirm. Alexandr identified this species for Dina. Only one Dendrolimus species is distributed in this region though, so probability is quite high.
Ophthalmitis albosignaria (Bremer & Grey, 1853). http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Ennominae/Ophthalmitis_albosignaria_albosignaria.html
Dmitry, I got doubt after your question. Here are only two variants possible, artemis or gnoma. Artemis is more often in this region though as well as in Primorye http://macroid.ru/showphoto.php?photo=29428. What got you confused? Please specify what's the difference between them?
Vasily, didn't understand, why add? Here's already Nacoleia maculalis South, 1901) And jpmoth.org goes wrong according to Synev.