E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49... 52

04.02.2014 13:10, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27333

Mesoleuca albicillata

04.02.2014 13:06, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27328

Most probably Jodis lactearia (Linnaeus, 1758)

04.02.2014 1:36, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #6380

No, Eddie, in Primorye only minimus and argiades. This is definitely one of the coastal species Celastrina.

04.02.2014 1:28, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27246

Looks quite similar to Japanese Apocleora rimosa (Butler, 1878) http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Ennominae/Apocleora_rimosa.html http://mushinavi.com/navi-insect/data-ga_edasyaku_kurokumo.htm (more shots available) Yet there is no such species in Far East according to Synev (I checked as well Сleora genus which has only three species in Far East (2 of them are in 37th region), no one ...

04.02.2014 1:06, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27243

It is not intermedia, and Habrosyne dieckmanni

03.02.2014 21:31, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27226

Suppose Peridea gigantea Butler, 1877 http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/75_Notodontidae/3138_Peridea/3139%20Peridea%20gigantea/Peridea%20gigantea.htm Yet have a question: Japanese websites say that the species has monetaria ssp. in Far East which was also mentioned by P. Morozov on molbiol.ru ("Our moths belong to ssp. monetaria Oberthür, 1879 which is as well distributed in Northeast China, Korea ...

03.02.2014 15:45, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27247

Hypomecis too. Perhaps one of two Far Eastern subspecies of Hypomecis roboraria? (http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Ennominae/Hypomecis_roboraria_displicens.html)

03.02.2014 15:36, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27249

Most likely Hypomecis crassestrigata (Christoph, 1881) http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Ennominae/Hypomecis_crassestrigata_crassestrigata.html

03.02.2014 13:59, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27162

Quite curious moth) This is Goniorhynchus, but the species... According to Synev, there is only one Goniorhynchus in Far East, Goniorhynchus explicatalis (Christoph, 1881). Yet there's rather recent publication by A. N. Streltsov, V. V. Dubatolov and A. M. Dolghikh called "New founds of Pyraloidea in Bolshehehtsirsky State Natural Reserve (near Khabarovsk) in 2008—2011 yy. (Amursky Zoological ...

03.02.2014 12:20, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27248

Chlorissa obliterata (Walker, [1863])

03.02.2014 11:35, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27253

He is the (only 2 species in the Russian Far East, in the south of second- Kurilkih Islands lives). On the territory of the Russian Far East - a subspecies genzana Matsumura, 1927

03.02.2014 0:19, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27176

Probably Sineugraphe exusta (Butler, 1878)? http://www.jpmoth.org/Noctuidae/Noctuinae/Sineugraphe_exusta.html

03.02.2014 0:16, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27221

Could be Gazoryctra macilentus (Eversmann, 1851)? (= spinifera Tshistjakov, 1996). (or Gazoryctra ganna, doubt between these two)

02.02.2014 20:22, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27216

In my opinion, Ure, it is one of your two Kirinia, most likely male Kirinia epaminondas

31.01.2014 22:21, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27173

Pheosia rimosa Packard, 1864

31.01.2014 20:54, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #8135

Rather, it Nemophora minimella. Often we found in the suburbs.

31.01.2014 20:44, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #3669

Options are no more, this is the only type of its kind in the 36 region.

31.01.2014 19:56, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27172

Here there is some doubt between the two species - in five living in the RFE. I would put all the same to Amphipoea fucosa (Freyer, 1830), but inaccurate, because there is a very similar type of Amphipoea ussuriensis (Petersen, 1914), in the 37th region, too frequent. Maybe someone will update ..?

31.01.2014 19:31, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27181

Notodonta dembowskii Oberthur, 1879

31.01.2014 19:30, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27178

Pelosia ramosula (Staudinger, 1887)

31.01.2014 19:29, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27177

Pelosia noctis (Butler, 1881)

31.01.2014 19:28, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27174

Peridea lativitta (Wileman, 1911)

31.01.2014 19:28, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27170

Polia goliath (Oberthur, 1880)

31.01.2014 19:26, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27166

Notodonta torva (Hubner, 1803)

31.01.2014 19:25, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27161

Mabra charonialis (Walker, 1859)

31.01.2014 19:23, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27115

Dysaethria erasaria (Christoph, 1881)

31.01.2014 19:23, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27114

Dysaethria erasaria (Christoph, 1881)

31.01.2014 11:30, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27164

Could be to confidently identified, there are only 2 species in Russian Far East, the second, yoshinoensis, though is in Prymorye only.

31.01.2014 11:18, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27157

Could be to confidently identified, this is the only species of the genus in Far East.

30.01.2014 13:48, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27136

Could be moved to confidently identified as there are only Smerinthus caecus and planus in this region (and Prymorye).

30.01.2014 13:39, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27135

Smerinthus planus Walker, 1856

30.01.2014 13:29, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27137

Deilephila askoldensis (Oberthür, 1879) http://www.jpmoth.org/Sphingidae/Macroglossinae/Deilephila_askoldensis.html

30.01.2014 11:30, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27138

Vasily, this is Miltochrista striata (Bremer & Grey, 1852). No need in adding species (many sources though do refer this to Barsine).

29.01.2014 17:32, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27092

Pseudebulea fentoni ssp. ussuriensis Munroe & Mutuura, 1968 (2 pics, http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/27105 were connected by the author in one group, they're clearly not the same specimen yet the species is the same)

29.01.2014 17:24, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27105

Pseudebulea fentoni ssp. ussuriensis Munroe & Mutuura, 1968

29.01.2014 14:11, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27106

Notarcha basipunctalis. I wrote this ID for according to Synev the species belongs to the Notarcha genus http://lepidoptera.pro/taxonomy/18826. Foreign websites though refer the species to the Haritalodes genus (see http://www.jpmoth.org/Crambidae/Pyraustinae/Haritalodes_basipunctalis.html). Here we've got the Haritalodes genus but with only one species http://lepidoptera.pro/taxonomy/26187. I ...

29.01.2014 12:38, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27110

Marumba gaschkewitschii most likely

29.01.2014 12:16, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27111

Most probably arumba gaschkewitschii, subspecies M. g. carstanjeni (Staudinger, 1887)

29.01.2014 11:36, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27112

Marumba maackii (Bremer, 1861)

28.01.2014 20:14, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27090

Why hurry?) Someone might confirm. Alexandr identified this species for Dina. Only one Dendrolimus species is distributed in this region though, so probability is quite high.

28.01.2014 19:38, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27090

Probably Dendrolimus superans ssp. sibiricus (Tschetverikov, 1908)

28.01.2014 17:59, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27088

Ophthalmitis albosignaria (Bremer & Grey, 1853). http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Ennominae/Ophthalmitis_albosignaria_albosignaria.html

28.01.2014 16:18, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27086

Pleuroptya quadrimaculalis (Kollar, 1844)

28.01.2014 14:26, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27094

Dmitry, I got doubt after your question. Here are only two variants possible, artemis or gnoma. Artemis is more often in this region though as well as in Primorye http://macroid.ru/showphoto.php?photo=29428. What got you confused? Please specify what's the difference between them?

28.01.2014 13:37, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27093

Vasily, didn't understand, why add? Here's already Nacoleia maculalis South, 1901) And jpmoth.org goes wrong according to Synev.

28.01.2014 13:31, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27096

Parapoynx vittalis (Bremer, 1864)

28.01.2014 13:16, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27093

Nacoleia maculalis South, 1901 (many Asian websites including jpmoth.org name it Nacoleia sibirialis (Milliere, 1879) though: http://www.jpmoth.org/Crambidae/Pyraustinae/Nacoleia_sibirialis.html )

28.01.2014 12:41, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27101

Problepsis phoebearia Erschov, 1870

28.01.2014 12:36, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27095

Talanga quadrimaculalis (Bremer & Grey, 1853)

28.01.2014 12:01, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27091

Caligula boisduvalii, fallax ssp. in Russian Far East, Jordan, 1911

Next page

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.