Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21... 33
Reminder moderators! The butterfly has long defined! Alexander Zhakov "rummaged in the net stimule S.Amerika it. So Acharia nesea. Peter, genus and species of the evening I shall bring to the directory " Move it!
"Photos Photo Artist and zoologists - no" Gold words!
Alexander! I still insist on the option Aricia artaxerxes. At Aricia agestis much more thick red stripe on the edge of the front wing than at Aricia artaxerxes. Here, the edge of the front wing seen enough to see that the red strip is narrow, not broad. Thus, it isAricia artaxerxes
This species is identified correctly.
BanalHelicoverpa armigera
Cerura felina
Anticypella diffusaria(female) - in the Far East she is one
Anticypella diffusaria(male) - in the Far East she is one
Anticypella diffusaria(male) - in the Far East she is one
Jankowskia athletaSource: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=212056&st=100 (watch the first butterfly in the message URL # 103)
No, not one, don't please move, I hurried.
Rothschildia erycina, female.
No problem, I will not rush.
It is not Furcula furcula! It -Furcula bifida
It is not Furcula furcula! It -Furcula bifida
It is not Aethalura punctulata! It -Hypomecis punctinalis
Alexander, why do you not have to endure? Is not that right?
Yes, I rewrote kommnt three times. I did not want to operate the command "two dogs on both sides." He appeared italics instead of referring to the form. But I still got his way, even if the third attempt.
"And this kind of duplicated: Maculinea alcon, http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/51159" I agree, take the obvious. Just a pity that our reminders are not wanted here. Moreover, they also swear when they are on the recall.
Judging by the caterpillar, not exactly Kentrochrysalis streckeri. In Primorye, there is another species of this genus -Kentrochrysalis sieversi. Maybe he?
Spilosoma lutea- rationale here: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/6485
And why is still in uncertain? Antheraea yamamaiit.
Spilosoma lutea- I googled for other species inhabiting (by blueness) in Primorye, and found that this appearance could only have caterpillars Spilosoma luteum
Spilosoma lutea - I googled for other species inhabiting (by blueness) in Primorye, and found that this appearance could only have caterpillars Spilosoma luteum
Spilosoma luteum- I googled for other species inhabiting (by blueness) in Primorye, and found that this appearance could only have caterpillars Spilosoma luteum
Ok, let it be in not identified as I'm constantly wrong :(((
These types differ in the width of the white stripe on the front wings. In Agriphila selasella wide white stripe, while Agriphila tristella white stripes or not at all, or it is significantly narrower than the Agriphila selasella. Furthermore, the overall color is different wings. In Agriphila selasella are lighter, yellow ocher, they have Agriphila tristella with a dark-colored, yellow - brown. ...
Svetlana Oxalic answer. In a post you wrote "write to the PM." PM on this site, to the great regret, is not, and therefore will have to resolve disputes directly in the comments.
"Write in a personal" PM on this site, to the great regret, is not, and therefore will have to resolve disputes directly in the comments.
It is not Cerura erminea! It -Cerura vinula
Pieris napi
Nymphalis xanthomelas
I did not understand well, just fanned the tragedy because of a trifle. Well written comments, and wrote. More photos will not be connected to comment. And again I say: I will respond to rudeness rudeness. Do you need it? Maybe you already start to talk to me normally, but not in such a tone?
Why just spam. Spam - Spam is a message advertising. And here I do not advertise.
Agriphila selasella
Agriphila straminella
And what do you react at me ??? I can also. And even harder. And even had time to prove it to you. But tell me at the mercy: it you want? Maybe it is easier to communicate easily? When I was well treated, I am also good in return. But when I start to chat with bad and rude, I'm sorry, this is not going to suffer and I will answer as bad and rude.Here's a math. And you have to put up with it, you ...
The same butterfly, as in the photo # 23885, therefore, A. sagana
I can't get as well why this butterfly is still in Vanessa atalanta. It's obviously Nymphalis antiopa. Should be moved as soon as possible.
At Aricia agestis much more thick red stripe on the edge of the front wing than at Aricia artaxerxes. In this case, of course,Aricia agestis.
Is this really Cerura erminea? Isn't Cerura vinula?
Brachylomia viminalis
"I would say that this Cucullia balsamitae" I am of the same opinion.
Opsibotys fuscalis(Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775)
Opsibotys fuscalis
It is not Furcula furcula! It -Furcula bifida. Gumenyuk all furkul distorted.
It is not Furcula furcula! It -Furcula bifida
It is not Thaumetopoea processionea! It -Drymonia ruficornis
It is not Aethalura punctulata! It -Hypomecis punctinalis
They live hard lives, thus ragged...:)
News
If you are not Molbiol user, just ignore the message below:
Пользователи Молбиола, перейдите на русскую версию сайта, чтобы прочесть об интеграции Инсекты с энтомологической частью Молбиола и о копировании форума на Инсекту.
- 22.05.2024: Еще одна цветовая схема
- 14.05.2024: Выложен первый полностью функциональный раздел перенесенного форума
- 09.04.2024: Recognition of species/taxa by file names of uploaded photos has become more convenient
New photos (28.06.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 13:21, P. Khramov: Александр, обратите внимание, здесь...
- 23:54, A. Dymchenko: Всем привет! Попробую впервые вылож...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Meanwhile, at the "Reptilium"
- Entomologist? What kind of job is it?
- The petition in defense of biological nomenclature
- Entomology jobs: BASF, Astrakhan State University and The Louisiana State University Agricultural Center
