Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25... 33
Irina, if you somehow have Synev's Catalogue at hand, would you please check which Hecatera species is distributed in Amur region? Very curious. I'm not used to give up so easy! This moth should be done... P.S. Where is possible to find this Synev's book? Everyone refers to that...
Yes, about what I had in mind. And not "monsters of the universe" (this is already too much), but steep experts! :)
No questions.
Hecatera dysodea
YoungLasiocampa quercus(Linnaeus, 1758). Is not it so?
A dead, driedPhragmatobia fuliginosa(Linnaeus, 1758). No luck poor thing. :(
A dead, dried Phragmatobia fuliginosa (Linnaeus, 1758). No luck poor thing. :(
Alexander, though yours, even more remains uncertain. But in this regard, I offer to all. I suggest (even insist) on how to create a separate topic in the community (that is not flood hurl) with the aim to discuss the question: why, for what purpose do we need such a site is hopelessly undetectable photos.The word "hopeless" I understand these pictures when there is no general (even the ...
Alexander, I believe that the ill-defined Pyrgus serratulae still can move. After all, you yourself wrote that the ill-defined transferred those instances, the cord is difficult to make a choice between several similar species. My opinion - this is the case.Do not marinate the same photo in this uncertain until the end of time ??? All the more so the case is not the most difficult (and sometimes ...
Alexander, what do you say? Waiting for an answer!
Here, IMHO, it is much easier than it sounds. The author of this butterfly was originally identified as a Carterocephalus palaemon. Period summer C. palaemon Perm - mid-May - early June. At the same time palaemon of pirgusov only fly Pyrgus serratulae. Alveus departs later - from mid-June. So, IMHO, in the photo - Pyrgus serratulae
First, read what I have said here http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/2505. Second, what other options ??? It is not Ukraine and central Russia !!!!!!!! The fauna of butterflies, by definition, much poorer! What then there may be similar species, among which could be doubted except Agonopterix arenella (taking into account the specific location where the picture was taken !!!).To criticize is ready ...
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
Spilosoma lutea
Spilosoma lutea
Euthrix potatoria
The vast majority of the photos that the author of the Perm region. This, I think, is also there. And yes, if a variant with malvae fails, it can be (given the fact that this photo was taken during the summer Carterocephalus palaemon) option with Pyrgus serratulae fit?
I wish I did not touch it at all :(
Young Euthrix potatoria (Linnaeus, 1758)
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
The accurate. Zygaenidae of the tracks are well characterized.
No! It is not Trichopteryx carpinata! It - Lobophora halterata !!!
Furcula furcula (Clerck, 1759)
Furcula furcula (Clerck, 1759)
Furcula furcula (Clerck, 1759)
Furcula furcula (Clerck, 1759)
Spilosoma lubricipedum (Linnaeus, 1758)
Zygaena lonicerae (Scheven, 1777)
No!!! It is not Carterocephalus palaemon. It Pyrgus malvae (Linnaeus, 1758) !!!
Eilema griseola (Hübner, [1803]) (in the ill-defined)
Smerinthus kindermanni
This species is identified correctly.
Click "confirm the form defined correctly." I pressed accidentally. Apologize! Nothing will transfer in this case is not necessary.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
First, not exactly S.ocellatus not S.caecus. The two feed on poplars and willows, but the plants on which sits a caterpillar in the photo, is clearly not a poplar and willow. And it looks absolutely on track and S.ocellatus S.caecus not like. Version with S. planus rightly dismissed Vasily. So it is - Smerinthus kindermanni / .
Eilema griseola (Hübner, [1803]) (in the ill-defined)
Summary - Pandemis heparana (inaccuracy)
Cerura felina Butler, 1877 (inaccuracy)
Furcula bifida (Barhm, 1787)
Furcula bifida (Barhm, 1787)
Acronicta menyanthidis (Esper, 1789)
Yes, inaccurate felina.
And what species of Cerura generally occur in the Far East?
The picture of Basil Feoktistov illustrating this kind and located on top of the page, in fact, shows a completely different look - Phengaris arionides. Correct would be necessary ...
News
- 31.08.2024: Первые итоги интеграции/переноса/дублирования Молбиола и Инсекты
- 25.08.2024: Further adaptation of the website for mobile devices
- 14.08.2024: Auto applying the properties "taxon", "author of identification", "precision of identification" to all photos in a group when one of the photos is changed
New photos (15.09.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 16:38, P. Khramov: Not identified → Doleschallia bisal...
- 16:38, P. Khramov: Not identified → Nymphalis canace /...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Meanwhile, at the "Reptilium"
- The petition in defense of biological nomenclature
- Meanwhile, in Kotelnich
- Butterflies and music: Malcolm McLaren, Madame Butterfly
