Pages: 1 ...18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26... 33
need to move in Cucullia lucifuga (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775) (but so far ill-defined). Do not leave it as Lacanobia suasa, in the end ???
No, not exactly umbratica. In this instance there is no characteristic umbratica yellowish area in the middle of the front wing: http://insectamo.ru/hete/98-hete/noctuidae/1311-cucullia-umbratica. It Cucullia lucifuga (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775)! But to endure in this case it is necessary in certain inaccurate.Why is imprecisely defined? Yes, simply because we do not know the date of capture, ...
No, not exactly umbratica. In this instance there is no characteristic umbratica yellowish area in the middle of the front wing: http://insectamo.ru/hete/98-hete/noctuidae/1311-cucullia-umbratica. It Cucullia lucifuga (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775)! But to endure in this case it is necessary in certain inaccurate.Why is imprecisely defined? Yes, simply because we do not know the date of capture, ...
Type defined incorrectly! It is not Cerura vinula! This is something of Furcula sp. Perhaps, Furcula bifida (Barhm, 1787) (in the ill-defined)
Type defined incorrectly! It is not Cerura vinula! This is something of Furcula sp. Perhaps, Furcula bifida (Barhm, 1787) (in the ill-defined)
If this photo is made in the Kirov region (as well as many other photos of the author), it is - Conisania luteago, no options.
Basil and label data, you can find this instance? Whether in the far east of catching this instance?
Basil and label data, you can find this instance? Whether in the far east of catching this instance?
This is definitely not Diarsia florida! This is Chersotis cuprea!!! http://insectamo.ru/hete/98-hete/noctuidae/1490-chersotis-cuprea Folks, how come?
Basil, pay attention to "Time and place / fishing." There in black and white the date: April 10, 2010 While Erannis defoliaria - autumnal view, its the summer end of September - October. So the author of the photo rights, Agriopis marginaria it.
Alexandr, sorry, but here can't agree with you. Who said this moth has dark scales on the forewing underside? This might be just poor light (as a result the moth got darkened), so it seems the forewing underside has darken scales whilst the species has actually no any. In the end, the wing shape ideally fits Pterophorus pentadactyla, any other species doesn't go because of the different wing ...
People! I want to admit his mistake. I do not know what I was thinking when he defines this as a caterpillar Smerinthus ocellata, but now, after quite a long period of time (nine months have passed since my initial determination) I look back at this photograph and horrified.In fact, there is shown a caterpillar not mottled hawk (Smerinthus ocellata), and lime (Mimas tiliae). I apologize for the ...
Guys, why not moving? Or you lost confidence in me? Sure I may easily err in microlepidoptera and promise will never try to identify them again, but it's not the case with hawkmoth larvae. In summer I get lots of hawkmoths of larvae including Smerinthus ocellatа and Laothoe populi so may responsibly say this is not Laothoe populi larva but one of Smerinthus ocellatа. Here everything's clear, no ...
Guys, why not moving? Or you lost confidence in me? Sure I may easily err in microlepidoptera and promise will never try to identify them again, but it's not the case with hawkmoth larvae. In summer I get lots of hawkmoths of larvae including Smerinthus ocellatа and Laothoe populi so may responsibly say this is not Laothoe populi larva but one of Smerinthus ocellatа. Here everything's clear, no ...
Guys, why not moving? Or you lost confidence in me? Sure I may easily err in microlepidoptera and promise will never try to identify them again, but it's not the case with hawkmoth larvae. In summer I get lots of hawkmoths of larvae including Smerinthus ocellatа and Laothoe populi so may responsibly say this is not Laothoe populi larva but one of Smerinthus ocellatа. Here everything's clear, no ...