Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28... 33
Amphipoea fucosa (in the ill-defined)
Amphipoea fucosa (in the ill-defined)
Amphipoea fucosa (in the ill-defined)
And this is why so far undetermined ??? ... For a long time already has been determined.
Very similar to the Amata phegea (Linnaeus, 1758). I proposed to be moved inaccurately defined Amata phegea.
I proposed to be moved inaccurately defined Amata phegea.
Well, maybe not ora ... But I find this butterfly is very similar to the ora appears.
Keep Dmitry. Imbrasia epimethea.
The ill-defined.
This species is identified correctly.
Phalera ora Schintlmeister, 1989
Phalera ora Schintlmeister, 1989
Phalera ora Schintlmeister, 1989
Theretra pallicosta (Walker, 1856)
It's just kind of Anuga. Well, in principle, this can be transferred to imprecisely defined Anuga indigofera.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
Scoparia basistrigalis (Knaggs, 1866)
This species is identified correctly.
Agree to Fedor is S. nigropunctata
Jodis lactearia (Linnaeus, 1758)
Hyphoraia aulica
No! In fact, in this photo - Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner, 1808) !!!
Scary exceedingly Bananas! This year ate the whole mountain ash in the city. And at the same time all the hawthorn and cherry.
Autographa gamma (Linnaeus, 1758) (in the ill-defined)
Smerinthus ocellatus (Linnaeus, 1758) (in the ill-defined)
Phigalia pilosaria (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775)
Phigalia pilosaria (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775)
Phigalia pilosaria (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775)
Calophasia lunula (Hufnagel, 1766)
I agree with the author. Cnaemidophorus rhododactylus (in the ill-defined).
If this photo shows the same butterfly, as in the photo # 10186 by the same author, it is likely Colias hyale
Polyommatus icarus (Rottemburg, 1775)
Calophasia lunula (Hufnagel, 1766)
This species is identified correctly.
picture author correctly identified
Aphelia paleana (Hubner, 1793)
Scoparia ambigualis (Treitschke, 1829) (in the ill-defined)
Scoparia ambigualis (Treitschke, 1829) (in the ill-defined)
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
All right, it Chilo phragmitella (Hubner, [1805])
All right, it Chilo phragmitella (Hubner, [1805])
Yes, it Chilo phragmitella (Hubner, [1805])
Gortyna flavago (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775) (in the ill-defined)
News
- 24.11.2024: «Поиск энтомологов» работает в полном объеме!
- 24.11.2024: We fixed an error in displaying the website in the "gray" color scheme
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
New photos (25.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 22:47, V. Kolesnikov: Похожа на Orthetrum cancellatum (по...
- 22:21, P. Khramov: Ранее раздел Поиск энтомологов толь...
- 21:25, P. Khramov: Registered users of Insecta.pro can...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- Meanwhile, at the "Reptilium"
- 20th International Insect Fair in Moscow (Russia, October 2023)
- Most biggest world's moth in the Perm city Butterfly Park
