Insecta.pro Community
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
It has been almost two weeks, I see no change. I am writing again. It is notDiarsia brunnea. It's eitherDiarsia rubi, orDiarsia florida(types rubi florida and do not differ in appearance only through the study of drugs genitalia). BecauseDiarsia brunneaphoto should be removed, at least in undefined. However, what I've been writing you? Do you want to err - err on.
In appearance this butterfly that can only guess. But here come to the aid of the summer periods. The butterfly was photographed on June 22. Eumedonia eumedon usually starts to fly much earlier than Aricia artaxerxes. Butterfly on fresh photos. Eumedonia eumedon at the time of June 22 can not be a fresh (especially given the geography - Kaluga region.), It certainly would have been worn or ...
I thinkAricia artaxerxes
It is more likelyAricia artaxerxes
Wrong. Eddy is right, this is berbera.
It is not brunnea. More like a butterfly from the group rubi / florida.
I'll say. Overal appearance says more for Melitaea phoebe. Though the angles here (underside hardly seen) make it hard to conclude anything on what's this, Melitaea phoebe or dark M. cinxia. If leave this in M. cinxia, then in tentatively identified.
I'll say. Overal appearance says more for Melitaea phoebe. Though the angles here (underside hardly seen) make it hard to conclude anything on what's this, Melitaea phoebe or dark M. cinxia. If leave this in M. cinxia, then in tentatively identified.
aglaja
This species is identified correctly.
Wrong, this is Apatura ilia instead
Boloria dia in the Vologda region has unambiguously.
Neither one nor the other. Boloria diait.
Common female colour in this species, nothing astounding here.
Quite similar to Mythimna pudorina (yet identified by Vlad Proklov).
Leucoma salicis is as well distributed in Primorye. Please read attentively the "Lymantriidae" thread on molbiol.ru.
Pleuroptya ruralis Sure if there is no another as similar species in the region.
Xanthia icteritia
Xanthia icteritia
Got it. Two photos in the middle look quite similar to our thing.
That's it. Just emerged and spreading its wings, thus the habitus seems kind of weird.
Celypha lacunana
This species is identified correctly.
Phiaris umbrosana This pic is grouped with http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/14401 which was "identified" by Sergey Novitsky.
Eddy Verfaillie was the first who identified, should be corrected.
Cabera pusaria
Cabera pusaria
This species is identified correctly.
" are easily distinguished by size (venatus larger) " It is not necessary to appeal to size. From the photographs the size of the butterfly still do not understand.
Vasily, I didn't offer any versions on what's this species. Just noted that this photo features the specimen quite well (despite two other pics of the specimen).
Two other pics of this specimen http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/20633 and http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/22453) may be not satisfying, whilst this one is good enough, everything's clearly seen. Am I wrong?
I looked at photos Ochlodes venatus the Internet. What I want to say. Differences from sylvanus zero, they do not. Paired Ochlodes sylvanus / venatus seems only possible definition of drugs genitals. In addition, in Primorye there are other species of the genus Ochlodes. On the site there are no people who could clarify this point. We do not have good people on Rhopalocera.Needless to think about ...
If you are satisfied ?, transferred to incorrect If it is possible to endure inaccurate. I am guided not only by signs O. Pekarsky, but also his personal observations. In my area Cucullia lucifuga, Napara C. umbratica, the most banal kind kapyushonnits I catch them every year at dozens. And they are all very similar to that of Slovakia. Oh, and one more thing.In Cucullia lucifuga "bean-shaped" ...
Cucullia lucifuga Grounds: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/10766
I think it's Cucullia lucifuga. At the time, Oleg Baking Offline molbiol in the topic "Definition of Butterflies" shows how to distinguish between types of C. lucifuga and C. lactucae (third similar species C. pustulata in Slovakia is not, according to the catalog on our website). What we have in this case? Darken the outer edge of the front wing there (in C.lactucae it does not happen) plus ...
Definitely not C. lucifuga. C. lucifuga has no yellow margins in its forewings whilst this specimen has and a huge one. I agree with Alexandr here that this is most likely Cucullia balsamitae though this species never mentioned in Moscow region, will be a new one in the hood.
Typical Hypomecis roboraria
News
- 09.04.2024: Recognition of species/taxa by file names of uploaded photos has become more convenient
- 28.03.2024: We changed timeouts for the author to edit some data for his photos on the website
- 19.03.2024: Insecta.pro and the entomological forum Integration
New photos (20.04.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 18:03, P. Khramov: A nice video from 2004 with Oleg Go...
- 13:02, P. Khramov: Bombus → Bombus sylvestris....
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- A. Gordon, O. Gorbunov, V. Murzin on Russian TV in 2004
- Interview with Alexander Zatakovoy, one of the wild Russian entomologists
- Entomologist? What kind of job is it?
- Fukushima butterflies: nuclear disaster after-effects
