Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29... 33
Gortyna flavago (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775) (in the ill-defined)
OK, sorry for the impatient. Uchtu on future developments.
Wrap will or not?
Wrap will or not?
Wrap will or not?
Wrap will or not?
Wrap will or not?
Wrap will or not?
Wrap will or not?
Wrap will or not?
Wrap will or not?
Wrap will or not?
Wrap will or not?
Wrap will or not?
Wrap will or not?
Wrap will or not?
Aglais urticae (Linnaeus, 1758)
Aglais urticae (Linnaeus, 1758)
Aglais urticae (Linnaeus, 1758)
Vitula edmandsii (PACKARD, 1864)
Vitula edmandsii (PACKARD, 1864)
Vitula edmandsii (PACKARD, 1864)
Most likely, Agonopterix heracliana (in the ill-defined).
Most likely, Agonopterix heracliana (in the ill-defined).
Most likely, Agonopterix heracliana (in the ill-defined).
Yes, it Hofmannophila pseudospretella, all right.
Yes, it Hofmannophila pseudospretella, all right.
Idaea aversata (Linnaeus, 1758)
Argyresthia conjugella Zeller, 1839
Depressaria leucocephala (in the ill-defined)
Depressaria leucocephala (in the ill-defined)
Depressaria leucocephala (in the ill-defined)
Clostera curtula (in the ill-defined).
Clostera curtula (in the ill-defined)
In this case the most likely Plebejus argus it.
Agonopterix heracliana (in the ill-defined).
Macaria signaria (Hubner, 1809)
Macaria signaria (Hubner, 1809)
Yes, it Macaria signaria (Hubner, 1809). You can move in precisely defined.
And in what biotope was made this picture?
Polia nebulosa (Hufnagel, 1766)
Polia nebulosa (Hufnagel, 1766)
My opinion - Epirrita autumnata (in the ill-defined).
I agree with an author photo, most likely it Gillmeria pallidactyla (proposed to be moved inaccurately defined Gillmeria pallidactyla).
I agree with an author photo, most likely it Gillmeria pallidactyla (proposed to be moved inaccurately defined Gillmeria pallidactyla).
I agree with an author phot, most likely it Gillmeria pallidactyla (proposed to be moved inaccurately defined Gillmeria pallidactyla).
Firstly, the shape of the wings. At the edge of the front wing amurensis with teeth, but they are more gentle and there is clearly a remarkable deepening. In populi edge of the wing again with teeth, but they are sharp (not flat) and arranged uniformly, without any kind, whatsoever recesses and curvatures.In this case, the teeth on the edge of the front wing of the uniform and pronounced, that is ...
Yes definitely Odontopera bidentata (Clerck, 1759) it is!
All right, Celastrina argiolus it. Why is still in uncertain?
All right, Celastrina argiolus it. Why is still in uncertain?
Next page