Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23... 33
Cucullia tanacetiSource: http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Cucullia_Tanaceti
Phragmatobia fuliginosa
Scotopteryx chenopodiata
Scotopteryx chenopodiata
"Sergey, there are a lot of things we're solidary about, just different approaches" If I was wrong about something, will do my best to get right. :)
"Butterflies are very different, different colors, different shapes sling, Do not you see it?" Well, actually, yes, I agree that there are differences. No questions.
It is understood, therefore there are no specific features in appearance, which can be distinguished? Or maybe you just do not want the secret is divided and because of the direct response go?
"Photos are better in the furnace :(" Both hands! Hooray!!! Even though what we are with you in solidarity!
Alexandr, one question please? You're so good in identifying Pandemis cerasana and Pandemis heparana, I'd love to know how to. Please share your secret? You may reply right with a personal message on molbiol or even by e-mail not to bother folks here.
And this I did not say that. No need to think out of me !!! But in general I am for a serious site. Now this I said, and I can be to blame for it.
Determinative.
But mind you, Alexander, first about the "serious site" I speak not, and you Napara Irina Nikulina !!! Do not attribute these words to me.
By the way, this pic is the same larva that #10967, maybe there body is seen better? Then again, it's not a distinctive antifeature that it's resting in fern. It might have been thrown there from its food plant with a windflaw. Such happens quite often. I've got another supposition. Can this be Lymantria dispar?
And as to whether Agonopterix arenella ???
Handsome!
ObviousHypomecis roboraria!
Agriphila tristella- a cautious assumption
well, so be it
Agriphila selasella
LathParadarisa consonaria
Well, just do not like it, then let it remain as it is. And what you do not like, if not a secret?
Pandemis cerasana- this is just a conservative assumption for the ultimate truth does not pretend. Source: http://insectamo.ru/micro/124-mikrocheshuekrylye/tortricidae/1634-pandemis-cerasana
Yes, Masha law isCalamotropha paludella.
Eupithecia pusillata- this is just a conservative assumption for the ultimate truth does not pretend. Source: http: //insectamo.ru/hete/91-hete/geometridae/1003-eupithecia-pusillata
I do not Basil, but I will answer. Yes, Alexander, you understand correctly. In the "Definition of a kind" must be specified not me, but Eugene Karolinska.
Agriphila straminella- this is just a conservative assumption for the ultimate truth does not pretend. Source: http://insectamo.ru/micro/106-mikrocheshuekrylye/crambidae/1728-agriphila-straminella
Spilosoma lutea
Lasiommata maera
I certainly understand that now I will mercilessly "showered slippers," but I will say that in this photo -Lasiommata maera. Note the date of capture.
I certainly understand that now I will mercilessly "showered slippers," but I will say that in this photo -Spilosoma lutea.
I certainly understand that now I will mercilessly "showered slippers," but I will say that in this photo -Spilarctia luteum.
I certainly understand that now I will mercilessly "showered slippers," but I will say that in this photo -Spilarctia lutea.
Vasily wrong. It is the most commonPontia edusa. Source: http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Pontia_Edusa (pay special attention to the head of the caterpillar!)
I certainly understand that now I will mercilessly "showered slippers," but I will say that in this photo stopudovo caterpillarLycia hirtaria. Source: http://insectamo.ru/hete/91-hete/geometridae/1073-lycia-hirtaria
I certainly understand that now I will mercilessly "stoned", but I will say that in this photo -Ectropis crepuscularia. Click on the picture to enlarge - and all at once will fall into place.
Photographed in the same place at the same day, and these: http: //lepidoptera.ru/gallery/22347 and http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/22346. There is a suspicion that this is the same butterfly. In short,Polyommatus icarusit.
The same butterfly exhibited a year ago at molbiole in "Seaside reports." In short,Chasminodes albonitensit.
So, maybe only two options: Polyommatus icarus or Polyommatus thersites, no middle ground. Plus, you yourself wrote that "Icarus, is also a good option." Based on this, I want to define this in the butterfly Polyommatus icarus. And you do not mind, judging by your post, written below, a human moderator you did not exist. What it is now changed?
I certainly understand that inevitably will be subjected to tough destruction by Alexander Zhakova, but still venture on his head to say that in this photo - Anthophila fabriciana
I certainly understand that inevitably will be subjected to tough destruction by Alexander Zhakova, but still venture on his head to say that in this photo -Perinephela lancealis
I certainly understand that inevitably will be subjected to tough destruction by Alexander Zhakova, but still venture on his head to say that in this photo -Anthophila fabriciana
Really can't I understand why for anyway the website would need such a huge amount of photos not identified??? Once you said that you wanted to have a "reliable website". Well the site with so many not identified pics can't be "reliable" by default and even will ne-ver be-come one! That's the reason why experts run away from this website like rabbits, just because it's full of needlees and for ...
I agree, I admit my guilt, I hurried. Again, I did not consider the factor of similar species. Butterfly on the photo may turn out to be Yponomeuta padella. In this case, I suggest to proceed as follows. Move all the same the whole group of photos in the ill-defined Yponomeuta malinellus.As on this site has been used this practice, and I see no reason to not use it again. A typical example - the ...
I agree, I admit my guilt, I hurried. Again, I did not consider the factor of similar species. Butterfly on the photo may turn out to be Yponomeuta padella. In this case, I suggest to proceed as follows. Move all the same the whole group of photos in the ill-defined Yponomeuta malinellus.As on this site has been used this practice, and I see no reason to not use it again. A typical example - ...
Yponomeuta malinellus- in ill-defined
Yponomeuta malinellus- in ill-defined
Yponomeuta malinellus- in ill-defined
Yponomeuta malinellus- in ill-defined
Polyommatus icarusin the ill-defined
Agree, let's wait for Alexandr's confirmation or disproof. He's better in these.
News
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
- 11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
- 11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community
New photos (22.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 11:29, P. Khramov: Not identified → Conocephalus fuscu...
- 8:58, E. Komarov: Алексей Адамов Здравствуйте Евген...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- 20th International Insect Fair in Moscow (Russia, October 2023)
- The petition in defense of biological nomenclature
- The world's smallest moth at Bohart Museum of Entomology, California, USA
