Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465... 625

21.02.2014 22:31, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27176

Corrected data. Not identified → Sineugraphe exusta / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.02.2014 22:28, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27355

Coming back to what I started with, this region is described in 40th region whilst I found nothing on Pyrausta neocespitalis on the continent.

21.02.2014 22:09, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27735

Corrected data. Not identified → Mythimna pallens / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.02.2014 19:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #2348

Corrected data. Vanessa indica / Simon Coombes → Vanessa vulcania / Eugene Karolinskiy.

21.02.2014 19:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #2347

Corrected data. Vanessa indica / Simon Coombes → Vanessa vulcania / Eugene Karolinskiy.

21.02.2014 19:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #2346

Corrected data. Vanessa indica / Simon Coombes → Vanessa vulcania / Eugene Karolinskiy.

21.02.2014 19:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27159

Corrected data. Not identified → Laciniodes denigrata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.02.2014 19:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21187

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

21.02.2014 16:41, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #10409

Alexandr, thanks. I neither thought about impura looking at the rest let alone the dot, that's why I prudently questioned this, just to clear this up for future cases)

21.02.2014 14:32, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27736

Corrected data. Not identified → Mythimna pudorina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.02.2014 14:32, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27737

Corrected data. Not identified → Mythimna pudorina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.02.2014 5:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27720

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Leucoma candida / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.02.2014 5:14, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27739

Not crucial plus one minus one but it can help someone as for location.

21.02.2014 2:20, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27733

Corrected data. Not identified → Lacanobia contigua / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.02.2014 2:18, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27734

Corrected data. Not identified → Anacronicta caliginea / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.02.2014 2:15, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27649

Corrected data. Not identified → Arytrura musculus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.02.2014 2:09, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27728

Corrected data. Not identified → Enispa bimaculata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.02.2014 2:03, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27738

Corrected data. Not identified → Rhizedra lutosa / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.02.2014 0:46, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #22928

Corrected data. Not identified → Orthotaenia undulana / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

21.02.2014 0:45, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #14402

Corrected data. Not identified → Orthotaenia undulana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.02.2014 0:44, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #14401

Corrected data. Phiaris umbrosana / Tentatively identified / Sergey Novitckiy → Orthotaenia undulana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.02.2014 0:39, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27725

Between two couples of "@"

21.02.2014 0:35, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27724

Corrected data. Not identified → Xanthia icteritia / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

20.02.2014 21:27, Anna Gerasimova: comment on photo #27602

I've googled for long)))

20.02.2014 21:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21181

I see not Sesiidae but some hawkmoth. Can't say anything certain with such pic.

20.02.2014 21:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #21642

Considering the "warts" this is some saturniid.

20.02.2014 19:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27727

Corrected data. Not identified → Minois dryas / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.02.2014 14:18, Lev Bely: comment on photo #27718

Prayer hour.

20.02.2014 12:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27729

Corrected data. Not identified → Syllepte segnalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

20.02.2014 10:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27719

Slightly seen reed abdomen in its sides. Too Chionarctia nivea. Synev describes it in 5 regions, 36th, 37th, 38th, 39th, 40th... I've got it as well in my collection :)

20.02.2014 10:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27717

Corrected data. Not identified → Cerura felina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.02.2014 22:24, Sergei Kotov: comment on photo #11755

That's it. Just emerged and spreading its wings, thus the habitus seems kind of weird.

19.02.2014 21:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27185

A white, supposedly Pareronia genus or something similar. Rare pic, don't want to keep this in not identified. Have been digging this already a few days, can't find. Anyone knows?

19.02.2014 21:35, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #27713

Corrected data. Not identified → Thyrgorina boghaika / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.02.2014 16:15, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #26305

The specimen was IDed as E.unicolorella then updated as E. elutella. Tough family and genus, not sure of this new ID, no sense to move it from species to species :)

19.02.2014 15:59, Sergei Kotov: comment on photo #11756

Cabera pusaria

19.02.2014 14:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27716

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

19.02.2014 13:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27636

I'm still at 7:44 asked Eugene, what to do and waited for an answer. But as you can see: spurred :) Frankly, if it were moved the MoD, would without question. In no other area of my Ochlodes not fly :) This in fact I trust: http://insectamo.ru/rhop/33-rhop/hesperiidae/30-hesperiidae

19.02.2014 12:36, Sergei Kotov: comment on photo #20634

Vasily, I didn't offer any versions on what's this species. Just noted that this photo features the specimen quite well (despite two other pics of the specimen).

19.02.2014 8:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Bastilla arctotaenia

Read on old Dysgonia. The truth is it's not my favorite Wikipedia, but here, in the section "Former species" is painted like a who's who is now: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dysgonia