Pages: 1 ...567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575... 629
I join the question. About faunaeur.org I think I'll agree.The flaws in funet are caused by the fact that this old resource, as it seems to me, has not been updated for a long time, and the taxonomy has gone far ahead in development during this time. There are a great many foreign sites, but, let's just say, the resource officially legalized by the nomenclature commission for the Asian region is ...
After a week or two I will update the whole base of European species, leading to roughly the same form as on the fauna. And that really has nekuzyavo obtained with all these differences.
Although catalogue pages were not so slow as community ones, there anyway were some hitches, now fixed and pages thus got way faster.
Can it be ever identified by such shot? If not, there are clearer photos of the top of its wings, but no underside...
Today, in 1 hour, I caught 17 mourning birds near a thin branch of willow dripping with juice. The most interesting thing is that I poured the bait nearby (water+sugar+berries+yeast), and not a single butterfly was interested, but they flew up and flew up to the branch... Pictures:DSC04824_1.jpg — (1.73мб) DSC04831_1.jpg — (748.35к) DSC04833_1.jpg — (1.51мб) DSC04835.jpg — (626.33к)
Yep. The more, there are photos nearby identified the very C. croceus (even though it was different item and different island too, neighbor one). As for biotope, dunno, science fiction says that myrmidone prefers rocky hills...
There is a first go of comments to see at the "Community" page of the English version: http://lepidoptera.pro/community/.
Comments common pages got 3—10 times faster, depends on a subsection and a concrete one. Besides, before there could be error page shown instead of a required one with comments. Now it's fixed.
Dima, don't get into an argument. Do you train for a lawyer (or even for entomogol?)? Plevako from you not poluchitstsa... You what? Do you also buy zhukof from Yakovlev?I didn't have any questions for you.
Now while uploading a whole archive, in case there is the same shot/caught location or date for all photos included, you may note this information once in the file uploader form, so it will be applied to all those shots.
As for Turkey and its "residents": http://lepidoptera.pro/catalog/?tax[]=6963&oc=or&om=or&oz=or&ocou=or&country[]=1012&size=s&perpage=50&order=lat, that means every beast can be there. Goes to Pieris brassicae, without gender.
Basil, thanks for the correction. Your comment has transferred to the photo page, because it relates specifically to a particular image, but not to the form itself.
You probably don't need an entomological examination, but an entomological examination by a specialist from Rospotrebnadzor or the Center for Hygiene and Epidemiology...Such a survey provides information not only on the type of synanthropic insect or tick, but also on the room and m. b. control measures...
Hm, looks rather dark for that. But ok, let it be promissa. I just caught lots of sponsa this year, so. Maybe, see it in others then. Sorry.
Oh, the material is ruined for nothing. A dust collector, not a collection.YES, it's a pity, not a scientific collection, but as a decoration nothing sorry for the criticism, in the photo DSC01805.JPG the butterflies are not spread out very well. A large collection is good,but with labels it will be just fine!This post was edited by ALEKSANDER - 07/28/2011 10: 40