Pages: 1 ...40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48... 144
So. If there are signs by which one can determine, Basil, describe them in the comments. If anyone knows foty defined without sufficient justification (the signs are not visible, and so forth) - unsubscribe in the comments to this fotam, will rule.
For the time being it is impossible for Uruguay. But we are on the way ... The only thing that I could not put down all ph "other foty the same individual," ie, possible neighboring foty the same instance, and the rooms they are not exactly adjacent (but they are loaded at the same time, that is still somewhere nearby).
Because in the conflict between the types of infe Fauna Evropeey and the blue of the default priority at Fauna. But synonymous added, so that the search in any case will be triggered for both options.
Hmm. Chet not quite caught up with me about this most sympatric. Taki is the period when the species can still be considered the same, but its different populations, which are not geographically separated, do not interbreed with each other?
Well so there Well written everything. There are two views - that this subspecies erectilinea and that an independent view. The first link is written, they say, as long as no geo isolation Borneo lёtayut simultaneously erectilinea and lipara, then it is not a subspecies, and the same kind of independent. Although, if I remember correctly, this can be within a species, but right now is definitely ...
If there genital types are defined by their appearance - it is wrong and needs correction. Throw links will rule. Inaccurate - this is when you have a reason to lean it to this kind among others. Make a list of these grounds pliz.
Basil, about the migration of butterflies talk tomorrow at the meeting. This page is no longer Saurimo.
Now there is the possibility of binding to other taxa levels. But the future Fautua reserve, yes. Only the type of Untie, Basil, if I agree. And if you do not agree - say where disagrees.
Znachitsa so. If this species is distinguished from its neighbors only on the genitals and on the basis that in this photo are not visible, then you need to send back to undefined.
And here Googol. If the authors have published a description, then everything is OK. Dim, published?
Cool. It must be kind to add. By the way, did not Storozhenki written there? Not the essence, kanesh, but curious.
A friend pachimu Dumchus not spread copies a section of the collection? .. [Tried to squint curiously, taking a pipe from his mouth]
And that is true. I'm in the same hotel the Nizhniy Novgorod and said, after 18 hours, no, no! However, it was the winter ...
We discussed on the phone, why you need to leave. Accordingly, while the reserve. If someone else will be some questions about the removal of his photographs (author asked to leave, and I did not immediately deleted), it is necessary to pronounce these questions (preferably in the phone) when I enumerated the reasons the author will be not enough, then I foty deleted. Iethe last word of a ...
If it would have been solved to the author, that the author had the opportunity to direct disposal. Negotiate the situation with fotami with numbers less than 5,000 and 10,000 for Skype ...
I am not against such rights for all photographers. Simple interface is not ready for the time being.
Replace this photo with a new image. Although various specimens, in this case it would be better than the deletion. And if you need to change something in the notes / geography, then just change at the same time, that's all.
Basil is not adding a new disk imaging and correction of old. All Sinev submitted to the site. And if not enough of the region, it is a glitch in the introduction, and it must govern. Typically, this way, in other regions there is an error for the same species. Therefore, in this case, Irina did the right thing.