Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52... 145
Basil, specifying the number doubles, apparently, you're sealed. About deleting a thousand times already explained why it is necessary to replace the complete duplicates and not deleted.
Well these two pics look totally alike. You just uploaded the same pic or replaced with that the old pic long ago. If something goes wrong, please give me a call to make it together online despite using capslock with three exclamation marks. Why?..
Please give a link to the double (who knows its number).
I may misunderstand a little. Question: why the new pic wasn't moved here to change the previous one? Or the moving feature doesn't work again, Alexandr, eh?
Why remove? Just change this pic to the new one, that's it.
Is it the same specimen?
If double, why wasn't joined to the new pic?
As lantern happy?
Buggy race misspelled deleted, moved views. As for the new species - a consonant. Generally, I will try in the next month or two, to make a major new update database taxa (fifty thousand new types of add), but as long as necessary for the reliability of taxa add hands, do not wait.
No, the second is not necessary. It will still be removed.
Pretty boy.
Original file name podalirius, so maybe a glitch at startup. Although it is a pity ... and Basil, to specify a minute Anatoly really ...
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 24—27 mm. Flight time: No formalized data → May, June.
Basil, thanks for the comment. A small request: leave comments relating to specific pictures in the pages exactly these photos. Website - living substance, today, "the rest" 2 shots, tomorrow - a dozen. IeOver time, your comments will confuse people, and if it is written on page foty particular, they say, it's not that kind, but this one, then certainly no confusion will arise. Ok?
Corrected data. Wingspan: 70 mm → 65—70 mm.
Corrected data. Wingspan: 65—70 mm → 70 mm.
Corrected data. Wingspan: 70—70 mm → 65—70 mm.
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 70—70 mm.
Making ready. As you come - call, the contract for the delivery.
Why no... No pattern features here to look out... While eyes could be sharper. Yet not necessary.
Yes, a typo. Thanks for the tip, corrected.
For those who wondered why the definition of the author Vasily and Irina are not - explained below. Basil, and I'll answer your question on the phone tomorrow. As for the FAQ and etc. descriptions and rules - the remark is correct, we will implement.
There have been questions about why the author of determination was made Basil, not Irina. Since initiative that decision came from me, explain the algorithm: User A: I think it's kind of X, but I doubt it. User B: I confirm this view H. Define a user A. User A: Here is the genus, species do not know, but I think that either X or Y.User B: Yes, this kind, and views of H. Define a user B. ...
Basil, add the base to formalize wingspan and flight of time.
Corrected data.
Corrected data. Not identified → Erynnis tages / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.
Corrected data. → Scopula immorata.
Corrected data. → Papilio desmondi.
Alexander, if you did not get them replaced, call me, understand, what it was.
Yes. Genereally. But Sinev's regions are not administrative districts but zoogeographical ones. I don't mean the Sinev's info is final and conclusive but we have to work up some criteria for the formalized and general data about species.
The word author.
But can we add formalized data because of just one photo? I mean we may public info about this discovery, but formalize it for the selecting species in the catalog? What is the criteria for such a move?
I do not see at close range, why is this happening ...
There are some reasons to leave the string exactly this and delete that, and not vice versa?
Comment belongs to the species rather than fote ...
Corrected data. Not identified → Cerura erminea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Confidently or tentatively identified?
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 9—11 mm.
Yeah. And the number of photos of the species in the web. Of which almost zero ...
Yes, it is necessary to make one more point-type pictures, and not just males but females with caterpillars.
Alexander, who had just walked out of your Akka and hassle replaced by a new fotoy old (this http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/32051 this http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/20764). After a complete renovation of the page with the old fotoy (in most browsers Ctrl + F5) - everything is OK, the page of the old foty new file. Do you now something else does not work or have all the rules?
Citizens who thinks about this?
Alexander, I realized Basil data is not in the region, and the common data for butterflies, typical for the region.
Basil, you have time as the flight of a private message. That's the size of the point-personal communication. We're with you discussed this already. Write a personal message, and there is no problem. Poor, even when a private message is not specified, you know?
Smooth better that the scales are not ripped off. Better yet (if it is a lot), to one side it had a smooth (for cheshuki) and other rough (finger).
Vladimir, do not be lazy to put down the properties of the "top / underside" and "live / collector" for instance, will you?)
Who says that? ..
Vasily indicate the source for the wingspan. And last would go well tolerated on the subject. I recall that the formalization of new data sources without the site should not be.
Alexander zvyakni my phone or just write the steps that and on what pages are doing.
The requirement is mandatory. With regard raspravki - they can crawl down, holding back their own strips of parchment / tracing paper / ribbon / paper with pins? Yuri probably attaches the wing just not strong enough.
News
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
- 11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
- 11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community
New photos (23.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 21:22, A. Dymchenko: Не перенесено вот это сообщение и в...
- 21:17, A. Dymchenko: Спасибо за ответ, Пётр. В таком слу...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- Meanwhile, at the "Reptilium"
- Entomologist? What kind of job is it?
- Butterflies and music: Malcolm McLaren, Madame Butterfly
