Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56... 144

03.02.2014 23:43, Peter Khramov: comment on Eulithis populata

Did.

03.02.2014 23:43, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #1836

Fixed. Fedor, please comment the species (photo is a feature of a species) on the very species description page, not photo one. Anyway thanks for the hint.

03.02.2014 17:17, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #27280

Why it's ok.

02.02.2014 15:15, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #27224

What's this effect edges always blurred?

01.02.2014 20:27, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #27107

Vladimir, please refrain from uploading pics with any marks in them.

01.02.2014 20:23, Peter Khramov: comment on Behounekia freyeri

Thanks for the tip, is ready.

01.02.2014 20:09, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #24375

Good looking.

01.02.2014 20:09, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #27205

You mean not identifiable?

31.01.2014 22:32, Peter Khramov: comment on Hypolimnas misippus

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Nearctic, Ethiopic, Indo-Malayan, Australian.

31.01.2014 22:31, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #27173

Corrected data. Not identified → Pheosia rimosa / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

31.01.2014 21:23, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #27188

Yeah, cleared that out.

31.01.2014 20:06, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #26707

It must confirm ...

31.01.2014 20:05, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #14401

Any thoughts on that please?

31.01.2014 20:04, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13840

And again about DV. Tell me one thread that the thread ...

31.01.2014 20:04, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #10741

Any thoughts on this?

31.01.2014 20:04, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8135

One thread confirm?

31.01.2014 20:03, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3669

Yet there are options? Our foreign colleagues are usually not very well versed in the Russian Far East ...

31.01.2014 20:02, Peter Khramov: comment on Apameina

Eddie, thanks for the tip. Please unsubscribe at other times comments to leave it on the pages of these specific delivery.

31.01.2014 19:59, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #26816

Is it really this? Please anyone confirm.

31.01.2014 19:54, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #27187

Ugums, unleashed.

31.01.2014 19:52, Peter Khramov: comment on Hypolimnas misippus

Sergei puts the data on the basis of the section "Detailed information identifying the sources." That's when there will be something written, except for the Canary Islands and Medeyry, then he would add something to the formal signs. And before that - not add, and rightly so. How the system already discussed this, and only you and Basil to the same ...

29.01.2014 0:56, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #27101

Vasily, the author pressed the button for the species was already IDed, but the pic didn't get connected. Not the first such case. So the button should be visible even if the species is not identified. Vladimir, if the pic didn't get connected to the species, you may do that during one hour after upload in your personal account on the website or later for which you should leave a comment on the ...

29.01.2014 0:54, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #27101

Corrected data. Irina Nikulina → Vladimir Bobow.

28.01.2014 2:59, Peter Khramov: comment on Glottulini

Thanks, I've corrected it.

28.01.2014 2:50, Peter Khramov: comment on Pleuroptya ruralis

Corrected data. Forewing length: No formalized data → 17—19 mm. Wingspan: No formalized data → 24—70 mm. Flight time: No formalized data → June, July. Caterpillar lifespan: No formalized data → January, February, March, April, May, August, September, October, November, December. Over-wintering stage: No formalized data → Larva.

27.01.2014 22:26, Peter Khramov: comment on Eustroma aerosum

I rename this kind of double and removed.

27.01.2014 22:18, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #27036

Why it's still there, the author noted that during upload, so the author is identifier whilst Alexandr did confirm.

27.01.2014 22:17, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #27036

Corrected data. Alex Dumchus → Roger Dolorosa.

27.01.2014 22:16, Peter Khramov: comment on Phyllodes imperialis

It's just a glitch at startup. Remove excess, thanks for the tip.

27.01.2014 22:09, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #27070

I constantly monitor not-illustrated species, so illustrations will be ultimately added even somewhat later. The only trouble thing is when a species was illustrated already with poor or smaller pics, I may miss such. Not this case though.

26.01.2014 14:42, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #27037

Corrected data. Not identified → Danaus chrysippus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.01.2014 12:44, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #27047

Igor, please upload pics with individual specimens in them, males and females separately.

26.01.2014 12:42, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #27051

Will sort it out...

25.01.2014 0:51, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #24252

Eh?

25.01.2014 0:50, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6619

Anyone comment please?

24.01.2014 20:58, Peter Khramov: comment on Calpinae

What do you mean, Eddy? I don't quite understand you.

24.01.2014 20:19, Peter Khramov: comment on Eustroma aerosum

Basil, the regions do not need to drive.

24.01.2014 17:24, Peter Khramov: comment on Eustroma aerosum

If I remember correctly, in such cases, usually the name of the original will aerosum, but later the fashion (perhaps borrowed from botanists or just for the sake of unification) to sculpt the image of the specific name of the generic, ie in this case aerosa. But reduced to one type still ought to, yes. ZY Sinev is not a basis, a foundation of generally cloudy question; -)