Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60... 144
Corrected data. Male → Female.
Guys, exotic larvae are absolute no-show? If anyone knows at least supertaxon, please comment, better that nothing.
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Clear. I watch the shooting that surely was one and the same individual or not. If anyone can confirm - Confirm ...
Here http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/13966? ZY Sergey, put a link to view only the first message or after a long break, OK? Otherwise polluted page. See. Http://lepidoptera.ru/community/17129
It is not right. That's right - this is when the search for synonyms and also (as we have done on the site). By the way, if someone sees a site directory on the butterfly with convenient search - give a reference. No one has ever seen. Well, except ...
And what does it mean?
Removed buggy line.
Yes you are right. Fixed.
Corrected data. Ova → Larva.
Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.
Author grit that one and the same individual. I stand.
Apparently, Andrew had in mind that this is a general view of the plant with a caterpillar, and she is shown in the adjacent fotah ...
Where would it take specialists in the Far East ...
I like this. It is a pity, as the wings of a muddy washed out, as well, and in general it would be interesting.
Written by the author and see what answer ...
Splendane boils down to?
Dmitry, thank fixed. In the foreseeable future there will be a form of comments not only on the pages of the species, but also on the pages of supra-species taxa.
Nothing "extra" in this case will not be. Feel free to add as a new line of data if the previous from the same source, for whatever reasons, were incomplete. This is not a description, and the transfer of data and sources, the basic part of this will go to the formal signs, and the rest - the fuller the better, let it be the full story.I added the disabled, then other users fully.
This, incidentally, is very good, when a person has the time. Such people we need! -)
Corrected data. Not identified → Siproeta stelenes / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
Corrected data. Not identified → Dryas iulia / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.
Guys, if you would like to discuss the very moving subj (not concerning this very pic), please welcome to a special thread http://lepidoptera.pro/community/17182
Guys, if you want to discuss the very moving principles (not concerning this very pic), let's organize it in a separate thread http://lepidoptera.pro/community/17182.
Comments concerning the relationship Modera and user moved to a separate topic: http://lepidoptera.ru/community/17183
Corrected data. Not identified → Doxocopa agathina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
Combined with Catoptria pauperella, once the form is removed.
Sergey, if not difficult, do not use an empty string in comments, they are visually strong tear text (the difference between the portions of text in a visual commentary becomes greater than the difference between the individual commentaries). And in fact, yes, the people, such cases have been and probably will be (about ill-defined or vague at all).Who thinks that?
For that I love Japanese photosites, is because they do not do not care users outside the Japanese language.
Dime, see it or not?
Galliry is fixed. As for the tooltips, yes, there was bug with incorrect signs on author pages. Now fixed. As for rebukes and other disputes, I'd like to say it fifth time that web messages may be reacted more expressive than real, alive ones, so please let's have some more patience and comprehension. I'm sure we're all here for similar reasons and purposes, and we're all people of reason and ...
Corrected data. Not identified → Phragmatobia fuliginosa / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.
Sergei, because of Yuri and saith. They say that on the genitals - in one pile, and that is not the genitals, but so far only to a genus or even a superspecies taxon - those in another.
Corrected data. Not identified → Lithostege griseata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Vasily, your output.
People. And the truth as synonyms? Or we can glitch which has crept in?
Alexander, the signature "definition of species" is given for the sake of brevity. In fact, this infa not about who is to determine the form, and that those who had information that at this picture, this look to the site. And yes, it can only be zaregalsya user.If it is determined by someone else, it is a good habit to write about it in the comments or in the notes to the picture (so now and make ...
It is simply an extra choice to make, to the uncertain, imprecise definition and precise definition be added to the definition superspecies taxon. Then those who are looking uncertain same, foty eyesore will not, and the new images will be views in this open.
Sergey, it is not necessary to produce the book. The catalog on this site all the same information; -) Just choose the region (s) and the necessary taxon and all.
Irina, I think, Sergey meant that even after the photos uploaded, if the monsters of the universe expressed in that spirit, that determination is not likely to, such foty I should delete. Q. By the way, interesting.Especially considering that for a long time expressed the wish that bind foty could not only view, but also from one side to the subspecies, and on the other - and to the genus, or ...
And the truth is exotic from the foreground to the rear)
Alexander, I understand that the last time you accidentally pressed or just refresh the page?
Sergei, the subject of what foty needed and what is not, has repeatedly raised the site. And yet, I think, will go up. Now I finish the new "Community", there will be forumoobraznaya part, including and a section of the photo. Let wound up there, and the topic will clarify these questions. (Will be ready in a day or two.)
Corrected data. Not identified → Cosmosoma ethodaea / Tentatively identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Cymothoe haynae / Confidently identified / Male / Alex Dumchus.
Alexander's your comment was, right?
Android does not affect, automatic comments generated on the server. If Fota dragged to the form, comments can not be formed.
Sergey, if around the Latin name in the comments put two dogs (), the program on site machine will put a link to the form (if it is in the database) or the name of the mold in italics (if the form is not in the database). It is convenient when reading the comments, try. Dim Pozhogin, you too concerned; -)
Corrected data. Euploea sylvester / Tentatively identified / Alex Dumchus → Euploea mulciber / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.
News
- 31.10.2024: The website contains English translations (if needed) of most Community/Forum messages
- 24.10.2024: The forum structure has been reworked. New sections have been added, and many topics have been moved to them
- 22.10.2024: Some photo descriptions have been corrected, and incorrect group bindings have been fixed
New photos (01.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 21:13, P. Khramov: Most of the non-English comments an...
- 14:23, P. Khramov: It's done....
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Meantime in Japan
- A. Gordon, O. Gorbunov, V. Murzin on Russian TV in 2004
- Interview with Alexander Zatakovoy, one of the wild Russian entomologists
- Caterpillars in the garden — friends or enemies?
